General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This Is How A Police State Protects “Secrets” - Marcy Wheeler/Salon [View all]JonLP24
(29,935 posts)they have also absolutely reached a verdict on people who were 100% innocent as well. A lot of the theory, which they argued is full of assumptions and maybe the specific crime is real but a lot of the theory is bullshit. Even if they have a lot of hard evidence they still use a story and they are allowed to tell a story, but it doesn't mean the assumptions aren't wrong though.
The governments efforts to identify Risens source was unusually aggressive by any measure, lasting more than six years. It stems from what was deemed to be damaging disclosures in Risens 2006 book State of War, which included a chapter about a CIA program called Operation Merlin. Risen described it as a botched attempt under the Clinton administration to sabotage Irans nuclear program by feeding the Iranians deliberately flawed design blueprints for key nuclear components. But according to Risens book, the Iranians uncovered the scheme and the effort ended up accelerating Irans nuclear program.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/41787944/ns/us_news-security/#.VMmOTckXEtQ
Again, if this was foolish and the CIA has been known to make foolish mistakes such as their recent plan to arm Syrian rebels it certainly merits concern so I don't care if what he reveals is legal or illegal -- I don't think the government does either. They would have charged him anyways.