Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Young woman shot and killed by Denver police in "stolen car" incident. [View all]Oklahoma_Liberal
(69 posts)149. As it should, under certain circumstances.
A panicked escape attempt with a human being between the vehicle and freedom is identical, in something I like to call reality, to a murderous vehiclular assault.
It is a ridiculous notion to expect a cop or anyone else to allow themselves to become roadkill if they can't immediately discern the intent of the person about to run them down.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Young woman shot and killed by Denver police in "stolen car" incident. [View all]
librechik
Jan 2015
OP
Stealing a car was a right of passage for many of us as teens back in the day
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#1
First of all, at this point all we have is what the cops told us or the media, and cops lie
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#5
He shot her in revenge rather than because he was in danger? Thanks for clarifying. nt
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#73
shooting someone after they run you over is "surviving in the face of violence", even if it was acci
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#122
Killing people who ram you is a crime. Don't want to be dead - don't do Oh wait...
Taitertots
Jan 2015
#140
Both, my brother borrowed from our parents and paid hell for it and he stole
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#23
Are you implying that stealing a candy bar is the same as running over a police officer?
Travis_0004
Jan 2015
#131
Oh we can keep it RIGHT HERE for everybody to see, I know OUTSPOKEN liberals are
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#22
I was extremely happy when I wrote that...i am not the one pretending to be a saint
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#93
ahh, the OLE "struck a nerve" ploy when you have nothing else to say, so as to make
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#147
I would never disclose that, there are many people on the internet, probably right here at DU
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#92
"Stealing a car was a right of passage for many of us as teens back in the day"
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#79
So it's not about justice so much as your ability to commit felonies without interference.
name not needed
Jan 2015
#118
"Purposely" is the issue here. Did the 17 yr old do this on purpose or panicked accidentally?
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#75
that broken leg for not appear to have been broken. Today's articles say injured.
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#104
Yep, some folk INSTANTLY believe anything and everything a cop says, and some dont
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#7
do you really buy the notion that the girl deliberately tried to hurt the officer?
librechik
Jan 2015
#9
The only practical way to avoid getting run over is kill the driver? How about getting out of the
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#76
Hostile encounters like this happen every day in U.S. high school parking lots...
hunter
Jan 2015
#137
High school students are running over other people with stolen cars on a daily basis?
Ace Rothstein
Jan 2015
#144
I'm an anarchist. In my not-so-humble opinion the police should be disbanded.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#83
I do not see anything about a broken leg in today's reports of this. Just "injured"
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#95
The severity of the injury is immaterial. The driver drove the car at someone.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#97
and today's reports do not indicate a fractured leg. 1st reports often are inaccurate
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#100
Again, the severity of the injury is immaterial. The driver drove at another person. That qualifies
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#107
NO, neither have I claimed what happened, only unwilling to instantly believe every word
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#30
You dont even realize what you are saying, if you did maybe you would think twice
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#34
Stop it, you are embarrassing yourself... you are INSISTING that unless I was THERE i MUST accept
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#36
LOL look who it is!!! I have to comment now before I am locked out for being too liberal
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#38
Let's see how it plays out. The truth is usually in the middle of the extremes.
Dreamer Tatum
Jan 2015
#48
Were you there AS it happened, WHILE it was happening, or AFTER it happened?
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2015
#72
look--we don't "know" the car was stolen by those kids--that would have to be determined in court
librechik
Jan 2015
#70
Seeing "the immediatie aftermath" and seeing what actually happened are two different things.
WillowTree
Jan 2015
#64
He mentions "Every one of us who lives in the neighborhood and saw what occurred"
JonLP24
Jan 2015
#133
I've seen a lot of stories about cops killing drivers who hit or rolled toward them.
Comrade Grumpy
Jan 2015
#51
wow. Thank you so much for this thoughtful (and fortuitous) post, Sarcastinator
librechik
Jan 2015
#69
The people who say we are anti-police when we decry cops murdering unarmed civilians
Chemisse
Jan 2015
#81
you say 14, the article says 17, and an earshot witness in "the immediate aftermath" says 16
NM_Birder
Jan 2015
#85
"the teen driving the car drove into one of the police officers, fracturing his leg."
Agnosticsherbet
Jan 2015
#132