Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Clinton looks to build support on left while keeping Wall St. friends [View all]
Clinton looks to build support on left while keeping Wall St. friends
The Hill 1/29/15
Hillary Clinton is working to shore up support on the left while not alienating her longtime supporters on Wall Street, as she moves closer to announcing a bid for the White House.
Its a difficult balancing act for Clinton, who has many ties to the financial world from her time as a senator from New York and is expected to rake in significant cash from Wall Street during the campaign.
The former secretary of State has signaled in distinct ways that she wants to tie her campaign to calls for tackling income inequality and wage growth championed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and the left wing of the Democratic Party. But she wants to accomplish this without coming across as a class warrior or enemy to her old friends.
In recent weeks, Clinton has been discussing how to thread the needle, according to allies. Shes sought out opinions from those on both sides of the Wall Street debate as part of a listening tour of sorts.
Not coincidentally, shes indicated where shes headed in her would-be campaign with a couple of messages on Twitter.
Attacking financial reform is risky and wrong, Clinton wrote on the social media network earlier this month. Better for Congress to focus on jobs and wages for middle class families.
A few days later, and minutes after President Obama finished delivering his State of the Union address, Clinton weighed in to say it pointed [the] way to an economy that works for all adding, Now we need to step up [and] deliver for the middle class. She used the hashtags Fair Shot and Fair Share to accompany her 140-character message.
Clintons recent stance is meant to assuage the left, which is itching for a candidate like Warren to enter the race and has expressed wariness of the former first lady.
I think shes moving there rhetorically, said Michael Lux, the co-founder and CEO of Progressive Strategies, a consulting firm focused on building the progressive movement and their positions.
...The narrative began during the Clinton administration, when Bill Clinton presided over financial deregulation and picked Wall Street executive Robert Rubin to run the Department of Treasury.
...If you say, Is she on the Elizabeth Warren side or the other side, shes much more left of center, said one Clinton confidante who is familiar with her thinking on economic issues. People should not confuse her long-term relationships with people in New York. She has personal relationships with a lot of these people. But that does not translate into being the Wall Street go-to person....
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/231102-clinton-looks-to-build-support-on-left-while-keeping-wall-st-friends
The Hill 1/29/15
Hillary Clinton is working to shore up support on the left while not alienating her longtime supporters on Wall Street, as she moves closer to announcing a bid for the White House.
Its a difficult balancing act for Clinton, who has many ties to the financial world from her time as a senator from New York and is expected to rake in significant cash from Wall Street during the campaign.
The former secretary of State has signaled in distinct ways that she wants to tie her campaign to calls for tackling income inequality and wage growth championed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and the left wing of the Democratic Party. But she wants to accomplish this without coming across as a class warrior or enemy to her old friends.
In recent weeks, Clinton has been discussing how to thread the needle, according to allies. Shes sought out opinions from those on both sides of the Wall Street debate as part of a listening tour of sorts.
Not coincidentally, shes indicated where shes headed in her would-be campaign with a couple of messages on Twitter.
Attacking financial reform is risky and wrong, Clinton wrote on the social media network earlier this month. Better for Congress to focus on jobs and wages for middle class families.
A few days later, and minutes after President Obama finished delivering his State of the Union address, Clinton weighed in to say it pointed [the] way to an economy that works for all adding, Now we need to step up [and] deliver for the middle class. She used the hashtags Fair Shot and Fair Share to accompany her 140-character message.
Clintons recent stance is meant to assuage the left, which is itching for a candidate like Warren to enter the race and has expressed wariness of the former first lady.
I think shes moving there rhetorically, said Michael Lux, the co-founder and CEO of Progressive Strategies, a consulting firm focused on building the progressive movement and their positions.
...The narrative began during the Clinton administration, when Bill Clinton presided over financial deregulation and picked Wall Street executive Robert Rubin to run the Department of Treasury.
...If you say, Is she on the Elizabeth Warren side or the other side, shes much more left of center, said one Clinton confidante who is familiar with her thinking on economic issues. People should not confuse her long-term relationships with people in New York. She has personal relationships with a lot of these people. But that does not translate into being the Wall Street go-to person....
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/231102-clinton-looks-to-build-support-on-left-while-keeping-wall-st-friends
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton looks to build support on left while keeping Wall St. friends [View all]
RiverLover
Jan 2015
OP
It's a good thing that she has a sturdy net under that tightrope she's gonna try to walk.
Autumn
Jan 2015
#2
Hillary's "talk" about income inequality and wage growth isn't exactly believable
Autumn
Jan 2015
#23
Depends on how you read it and what class you belong to and how much faith in congress you have. eom
Autumn
Jan 2015
#53
Hell, Gramm Leach Bliley was "Financial Reform" - you do remember that, don't you?
hatrack
Jan 2015
#49
That would be her husband; and the squishy fruit doesn't fall far from the neolib tree
hatrack
Jan 2015
#72
Yep! Voters will be under the bus while her Wall Street buddies & their money will be in the bus. nt
benz380
Jan 2015
#17
Looks like the over and over again attack on working people of the US, sounds like you would rather
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#15
+1. We're not going to significantly raise wages without going after the 1%.
winter is coming
Jan 2015
#20
Nothing wrong with doing both but right now the working people needs priority.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#33
I need to be able earn enough money to support myself, this is important to myself plus others
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#42
Tell a kid who has to go to bed at night hungry prosecuting Wall Street is more important.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#51
Since many are wondering why there are not some involved with Wall Street in prison, how does one
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#66
Good question, and totally off the point of the posts you were addressing.
truebluegreen
Jan 2015
#86
One needs to be prosecuted before going to prison or normally this is part of
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#88
No it will not trickle down, this was Reagan's folly, started in the 80's, it has not happened, in
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#44
You missed the complete statement Hillary made, she said better to focus on jobs and wages.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#54
Do you know there are more Democrats than Republicans? Go figure, somebody did not show up to vote
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#61
Exactly what I said before, they don't have a perfect candidate so they don't vote. This is a
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#67
Since when is wanting a candidate that represents you a demand for "perfect"?
winter is coming
Jan 2015
#78
Then if you choose not to vote because the candidate does not stand with you
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#79
As I said be happy with the Republican, apparently you think not turning out to vote
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#82
+1. There will be a lot of candidates talking about income inequality next year.
winter is coming
Jan 2015
#77
I am neither oblvious nor naive, I wonder about those so interested in placing Wall Street above
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#35
You have it backwards, you want Wall Street above the people, change your priorities, put the people
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#55
Let's see, could having jobs at livable wages helpful to people interested in providing for their
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#60
And you illusion of how to help working people helps who? Get the jobs going, reform the taxes
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#69
Oh, yea, she was for the WORKING PEOPLE. She knew Americans having jobs and a livable wage was very
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#71
Didn't she have a role in starting this TPP thing? She is going to have to learn to twist herself
jwirr
Jan 2015
#26
Why would a Democrat have to 'try to balance' anything when it comes to Wall St V The People?
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#58
"Isn't she aware of the evidence that Wall St is the ENEMY of the Working class?"
FiveGoodMen
Jan 2015
#59
No Democrat is capable of winning the presidency in 2016 without raising $1 billion.
MohRokTah
Jan 2015
#62
Bingo. Like it or not...it's unemotional, non-partisan fact. And the other would-be
libdem4life
Jan 2015
#87
We will embrace this rebellion. You will support it from our lands in the north
aint_no_life_nowhere
Jan 2015
#73
England is too rich and powerful and we will lose this rebellion because Washington is weak.
Ichingcarpenter
Jan 2015
#76