Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
67. So I guess
Fri Jan 30, 2015, 04:26 PM
Jan 2015

the House Foreign Affairs Committee is unconstitutional? Ridiculous.

Netanyahu didn't hide his plans...I think publicly accepting an invitation is pretty much the opposite of hiding his plans.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Treason DUgosh Jan 2015 #1
No, it's not. Scootaloo Jan 2015 #2
Thank you markpkessinger Jan 2015 #10
Agreed. It was just a massive breach of protocol and a slap in the face to Obama and long Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #27
True, Bibi was hoping to boost his support in Israel's election, which btw, is AGAINST Israel's sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #51
That, apparently, is not the way the Village Beltway mass media sees it, all that matters, isn't it? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #54
But it is how the WH and the five nations involved in helping the President avoid a confrontation sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #57
Much as I can't stand those fuckers, they ain't enemies of the United States. Iggo Jan 2015 #4
I disagree. They, the Republicans. ARE enemies of the United States. IMO ladjf Jan 2015 #31
Yeah, but your opinion doesn't change the definition of treason. Iggo Jan 2015 #32
My post didn't pertain to the treason charges. I was countering the ladjf Jan 2015 #33
aH! Iggo Jan 2015 #35
No, it's not. GGJohn Jan 2015 #23
It's certain not treason but disrespect yeoman6987 Jan 2015 #29
Actually, he doesn't... TreasonousBastard Jan 2015 #3
actually he does onenote Jan 2015 #17
Not quite the same thing... TreasonousBastard Jan 2015 #18
if the foreign relations committees hold hearings on foreign policy matters onenote Jan 2015 #30
Foreign leaders have always been invited to speak to Congress SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #36
Not according to the Logan Act, he doesn't. In fact, he should be prosecuted for violating it. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #5
What about Sen. Sanders making demands on Obama's TPP negotiations? Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #11
I don't understand your question. Has Senator Sanders negotiated with foreign heads of State or BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #13
If foreign policy is the strict purview of the executive then why does Sen. Sanders get a pass? Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #14
So when was there never opposition? You are trying hard to make Sanders look bad and Rex Jan 2015 #19
I have no intention of making Sen. Sanders look bad. On the contrary Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #25
NO ONE's giving Senator Sanders a pass - but he's done NOTHING wrong. You're comparing apples and BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #39
"directly commencing or carrying on any correspondence with a foreign government, or agent thereof" Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #40
Republicans *wanted* to charge her with violation of the Logan Act, but they knew it was political BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #44
"Not once...has the Speaker invited a head of a foreign country to speak to the entire Congress" Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #63
Wrong. onenote Jan 2015 #16
Hear! Hear! Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #26
Should Nancy Pelosi have been prosecuted for her 2007 trip to Syria? Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #42
You had to post this TWICE?? That reeks of desperation. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #46
Please proceed Mr Speaker C_U_L8R Jan 2015 #6
so where's the outrage for the pope speaking before congress? nt msongs Jan 2015 #7
His invite followed protocol Panich52 Jan 2015 #9
Proper channels? SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #37
Heads of state visiting another country are supposed to advise the host country geek tragedy Jan 2015 #62
So I guess SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #67
It can consider legislation and spending, but it has no consular or diplomatic authority. geek tragedy Jan 2015 #68
Make all of the SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #69
Sure, he has the legal right to do that, but it's also partisan and crass geek tragedy Jan 2015 #70
Yeah. 'Cause that's the same thing. lol...nt SidDithers Jan 2015 #34
Oh yeah, shift the blame Orange man benld74 Jan 2015 #8
Boner LIES for a living so.. you take anything he says as a fact. Cha Jan 2015 #12
Could be song by the 'Boner Boys' benz380 Jan 2015 #15
How pathetic, the GOP has defenders on DU. However it is not surprising in the least bit. Rex Jan 2015 #20
Ummm, no. GGJohn Jan 2015 #24
Nope, not at all SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #38
Yep. At least we know who they are. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #48
Of course he does. It may be crass, disrespectful, and a breach of protocol, Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #21
It's pretty ridiculous tammywammy Jan 2015 #22
Boehner violated Federal law, specifically the 1799 Logan Act, 18 U.S. Code, subsection 953. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #41
Should Nancy Pelosi have been prosecuted for conducting foreign policy in Syria in 2007? Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #43
Has Speaker Pelosi invited Assad to speak to a joint session of Congress in order to influence BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #45
So you'd be OK with Boehner traveling to Israel to meet with Netanyahu there, Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #47
I asked first. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #49
Actually the first question was asked by me in post 43, which you have still not answered. Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #50
Still grasping at straws, I see. Anyway, asked and answered. Perhaps you need to reread my post BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #56
Sorry I made you twist yourself into such a pretzel (nt) Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #58
As I've guessed from the get-go...your arguments have no leg to stand on. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #59
Apology accepted. Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #60
Thank you. But your apology isn't. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #61
LOL! You forgot to add nyah nyah. Demit Jan 2015 #53
Well, isn't it common courtesy and an act of mature propriety to answer a question first before BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #55
Well, I'd say a sign of maturity, if your goal is an exchange of information, Demit Jan 2015 #64
You're overlooking the fact that I HAVE answered the question, so I HAVE extended courtesy FIRST. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #65
I did read the thread. Demit Jan 2015 #66
Already totally debunked -- see post 16 onenote Jan 2015 #52
How many of our tax dollars is Boehner going to give him? Then they scream about the debt. . . B Calm Jan 2015 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Boehner: 'We have a right...»Reply #67