Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The point of TPP is to boost US exports. That's why PBO is behind it. [View all]fadedrose
(10,044 posts)117. Not as many haters as there were
When this all started, I was all upset about it. Sent an email to the WH and told the President (his email reader) that I was concerned about all the negativity concerning TPP.
I got a reply (maybe he didn't write it, but it has his touch) that didn't tell me details, but was comforting. It's kinda long, but oh well, here goes:
The White House, Washington
Dear Martha:
Thank you for writing. Trade and investment are critical parts of my strategy to create jobs, spur growth, and strengthen the middle class. My Administration is pursuing a global trade agenda to place our businesses, workers, and consumers at the center of the 21st‑century economy, and to shape the trade landscape so we promote both our interests and our values.
We are opening markets and leveling the playing field for Americans by pursuing and negotiating a series of ambitious trade agreements. In the Asia‑Pacific region, the Trans‑Pacific Partnership will knock down barriers to American exports while raising labor and environmental standards in the fastest‑growing region in the world. Elsewhere, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership will strengthen our economic partnership with the European Union by further reducing tariffs and regulatory barriers while maintaining high environmental, consumer, and health standards. Together, these agreements will foster free trade with two‑thirds of the global economy and safeguard workers rights and the environment.
At the same time, my Administration has redoubled our efforts to enforce existing trade agreements. Vigilant monitoring and enforcement of our current trade agreements are essential to protecting our trade rights, which is why weve taken action to ensure our partners abide by their commitments. We have also fought hard to resolve unwarranted barriers to American agricultural, manufacturing, and services exports, and were creating additional opportunities for Americans through our ongoing negotiations on services, information technology, and environmental goods at the World Trade Organization. Our work has produced real results, making it easier for businesses to export goods and services and to reach consumers living outside our borders.
With a highly educated workforce, an entrepreneurial culture, a strong rule of law, and abundant sources of affordable, cleaner energy, the United States has the potential to be the production platform of choice. My Administration is striving to ensure America is the place where businesses want to locate and hire, and goods stamped Made in the U.S.A. are the products of choice in the global marketplace. We will continue these efforts because we know our workers and businesses are the most productive in the world.
Again, I appreciate your message. I am confident we can support job growth at home and boost exports while promoting our values and raising standards around the globe.
Sincerely,
Barack Obama
Visit WhiteHouse.gov
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The AFLCIO has not received any information they requested. WaPo has their information for the story
think
Jan 2015
#7
Does the AFLCIO traditionally have a right to information from the Fed. Gov't while still in
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#13
Clearly candidate Obama felt so since he stated he would invite the AFLCIO to renegotiate NAFTA /nt
think
Jan 2015
#15
Well, that was *before* he understood what being president would be like. Then, when he entered the
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#39
Well what did he learn that would make him decide to exclude labor from the discussion?
think
Jan 2015
#49
Swiftboating. It's no secret that labor is against anything that they perceive to be NAFTA-esque.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#56
A secret trade document that the largest corporations helped write and you blame labor
think
Jan 2015
#61
I trust this president more than Labor. Sorry, but I haven't really had good experiences with Labor.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#71
151 Democratic representatives from the house is alot of congress people to call out
think
Jan 2015
#79
You're entitled to your opinion. Anyway, do you know what the president wanted to fast-track
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#89
The PResident is after real Jobs for Americans.. we'll see what else he likes about this when
Cha
Jan 2015
#6
Were the 151 Democratic congress persons who raised their concerns "swiftboaters"?
think
Jan 2015
#42
Have Democrats in Congress ever really gotten President Obama's back in the past six years?
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#50
Not dismissing those concerns. I'm questioning them. Fast-tracking TPP would mean that Republicans,
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#87
Thanks for posting this! I was looking for it in order to try and understand why Pres. Obama is
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#8
But the good stuff was just TheObamaDeception©. TheAnti-Christ© always does that.
freshwest
Jan 2015
#21
Or...they just say, "Don't believe him!" or "Sales pitch! I'm not buying it", forgetting, of course,
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#40
I didn't want to see it that way, but when I read some posts here and on other
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#113
I've been disillusioned by many Liberals and Progressives who I thought were color blind, but
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#118
"... President Obama has yet to do anything that would harm the American worker ..."
Scuba
Jan 2015
#101
I have no hate for the President, but I don't figure the loss of 60,000 manufacturing jobs ...
Scuba
Jan 2015
#116
That's not how your posts come across, Scuba. Rarely do I see you praise the president
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#121
My thoughts exactly. I love Ed Schultz, but he's been wrong many times before compared to President
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#47
No. No suggesting that at all...seriously or just for shits and giggles. I'm pointing out that
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#91
First, before any new trade agreements, we have to get our balance of payments numbers under
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#63
How the auto jobs and manufacturing Obama saved... I remember when American cars were the standard.
freshwest
May 2015
#149
Yes, here let me take your job. It only hurts for a little while. And look at how good you will
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#70
Then why the sections allowing corporate thugs to overrule elected governments? n/t
eridani
Jan 2015
#32
Could you, ucrdem, please post the TPP agreement since you are advocating for it so strongly?
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#77
That is not a trade agreement. That is an absolutely worthless, vague and very general
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#86
I guess if one thinks we are self-sufficient and should stick to the rest of the world. I don't.
Hoyt
Jan 2015
#124
I don't think you get where you want to be by isolation, particularly in the long run.
Hoyt
Jan 2015
#133
I agree - vagueness of the language leaves the actual action open to a whole bunch of differing
jwirr
Jan 2015
#127
American jobs were going with or without NAFTA. NAFTA gets blamed for a lot of junk
Hoyt
Jan 2015
#38
Not like they were starting in the late 1990s after NAFTA, GATT/WTO Uruguay round, MFN for China
Elwood P Dowd
Jan 2015
#59
Thank goodness, one of only a few threads not bashing Obama for selling us down the river with TPP.
Hoyt
Jan 2015
#37
Before we enter into any more trade agreements we need to fix our balance of payments numbers.
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#57
Boost Exports, yeah jobs, oil and US Dollars is the only thing that will be exported
ChosenUnWisely
Jan 2015
#97
Exports are 40% of Germany's economy; 9% of the US'. Imports are 35% in Germany; 13% in the US.
pampango
Jan 2015
#100
So anyone with a different opinion is "Third Way" and a member of the BOG? Nice.
pampango
Jan 2015
#107
All international treaties are negotiated 'in secret'. Should liberals oppose all treaties?
pampango
Jan 2015
#122
Folks seem uninformed..as you say treaties are ALWAYS negotiated in secret, voted in in public. Duh.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#126
Nice spin. I said "even if I disagree with the rest" and "reject most of what they peddle". That
pampango
Jan 2015
#134
It's an illogical knee-jerk reaction to despise the Third Way for trying to
LondonReign2
Feb 2015
#141
I also want to thank them for rec'ing the thread. It is nice to have a concise list.
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2015
#110
We had a hell of a storm three years ago and Jesus suggested we go with a metal roof.
Autumn
Feb 2015
#142
How is there an assumption of knowledge, let alone accuracy. The fucking deal is a secret. Yeah
lonestarnot
Jan 2015
#119
Logic checker: increased trade means increased jobs...for both partners. Obama is correct.
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#153
For that claim to be true, the TPP would need to cover countries with trade barriers
jeff47
May 2015
#150
the only "export" under TPP would be filthy, Earth-warming fossil fuels- tar sands oil& fracked gas
TimeToEvolve
May 2015
#154