Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bill Maher Drops A Reality Bomb On Republicans: American middle-class was created though socialism [View all]ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)39. no; the decline *started* before the collapse, but not "way before". There were rebellions
going on in most of the Soviet republics throughout the 80s, and 6 formally declared independence in 1990, three years before the USSR formally 'collapsed'.
The weakness of the USSR, helped on by the US, was the reason for the turn to the right.
You remember when the Soviets had to buy wheat from the US?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_grain_robbery
That was a symptom of its weakness, as it's got a huge grain belt.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bill Maher Drops A Reality Bomb On Republicans: American middle-class was created though socialism [View all]
kpete
Jan 2015
OP
Talking to a friend that works for a medical insurance company. Just where did your job come from?
brewens
Jan 2015
#2
Any kind of size-able middle class is impossible without government intervention
stevenleser
Jan 2015
#3
I am an upper-case 'D' Democrat, but I'm really a lower-case 'd' democratic socialist.
ColesCountyDem
Jan 2015
#9
socialism = socialized means of production and socialized distribution of benefits/wealth. so
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#28
sorry, they *are* socialist; the cost and benefit is socialized. the opposite would be privately
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#35
if the government was paying for free entertainment for the masses -- yeah, it was at least
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#41
The main reason was the existence of the soviet bloc and communism as the "threat of a
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#29
no; the decline *started* before the collapse, but not "way before". There were rebellions
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#39
Good on Bill. Joaquin Casto was great. Dems. should put him in a cabinet position or VP asap.
appalachiablue
Jan 2015
#23
I suspect Julian Castro will be the Dem VP nominee in 2016, or in 2020 at the latest. nt
tblue37
Jan 2015
#38
Don't think he's had Warren on the show; he should. Naomi Klein was on last fall, Bernie too.
appalachiablue
Jan 2015
#46
Confession: We bought our house with the GI Bill. Couldn't have done it without
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#49
We do have Socialsm in this country, it's called Privatize the profits - Socialize the losses
Dont call me Shirley
Jan 2015
#55
Oh is that he says? What does Rush Limbaugh think? And how about Mitt Romney?
closeupready
Jan 2015
#63