Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)

5. Warren as sated five times she is not running.

Reply to NYC_SKP (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 1, 2015, 12:53 AM

Feb 2015

She has no desire to raise a billion dollars from "real people." because she has stated she is not running.

I think that, in this case, no means no.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'll say it again. IF A CANDIDATE CANNOT RAISE $1 BILLION, THEY ARE NOT A VIABLE CANDIDATE. PERIOD. [View all] MohRokTah Feb 2015 OP

Draft Senator Warren for President, 2016 (nt) NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #1

I hate to harp on this, but she doesn't want it. She really DOESN'T. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Feb 2015 #3

Warren as sated five times she is not running. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2015 #5

Jeb vs Warren would be dreamy because we'd have nominees for both Parties who voted for Reagan and Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #22

You're still shoveling horseshit I see. AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #31

Its sad that this is what matters and not being the best candidate. Shoulders of Giants Feb 2015 #2

Exactly. enlightenment Feb 2015 #4

Voting is purely a dog and pony show. Wasington's kabuki theatre. A total sham. blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #9

Would it amaze you to know Walker raised $53 million just for his State re-election campaign? brooklynite Feb 2015 #6

No. I already knew that. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #8

Shouting at us doesn't make you more correct. Nor does posting the same thing a dozen times. winter is coming Feb 2015 #7

I'll say it again. IF A CANDIDATE CANNOT MOTIVATE VOTERS, THEY ARE NOT A VIABLE CANDIDATE. PERIOD. Scuba Feb 2015 #10

+100. Though the PTB would apparently be OK with very low turnout. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #11

Sometimes I wonder if we ever hear ourselves talk (or yell) Oilwellian Feb 2015 #12

I agree. HappyMe Feb 2015 #14

I didn't pen the Citizens United decision. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #28

The malignancy presented as the excuse. woo me with science Feb 2015 #13

Not seriously, but, 3rd Way Dems plan a candidate able to split the big money, right? HereSince1628 Feb 2015 #15

Wrong. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #16

I suspect that generality will be tested HereSince1628 Feb 2015 #25

Normally, you may be right forthemiddle Feb 2015 #17

lol, republicans have to 'buy' their primary position 'chance' from their 1% donators. Sunlei Feb 2015 #18

Romney cannot donate $10 million to the GOP. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #29

donate to PACs or he can 'buy' 20,000 copies of a republicans crappy $500 online books. Sunlei Feb 2015 #30

How many of our Democratic candidates can do that? jwirr Feb 2015 #19

Right now, I only see one with the network to do so. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #20

Agreed. But truthfully if more than two run in the primary no one would neccesarily be able to jwirr Feb 2015 #21

Oh, I agree completely, it's definitely broken. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #23

Absolutely. Taking back the SCOTUS is the most important issue we have. If an R gets to appoint jwirr Feb 2015 #24

IF A CANDIDATE (is requird to) RAISE $1 BILLION, THEY ARE NOT A VIABLE CANDIDATE. PERIOD NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #26

Ignoring the reality of national politics in America doesn't make it go away. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #27

In other words, they have to be bought up by the 1% in order to get elected davidn3600 Feb 2015 #32

This is a democratic republic. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #33