Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Editor of major German newspaper says he planted stories for CIA [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)4. Church Committee in 1976 reported CIA manipulated US Press...
...stating a number, 500 journalists, but not naming names. As you wrote, Jackpine Radical, Carl Bernstein filled in the blanks:
THE CIA AND THE MEDIA
How Americas Most Powerful News Media Worked Hand in Glove with the Central Intelligence Agency and Why the Church Committee Covered It Up
BY CARL BERNSTEIN
(originally in Rolling Stone way back when)
In 1953, Joseph Alsop, then one of Americas leading syndicated columnists, went to the Philippines to cover an election. He did not go because he was asked to do so by his syndicate. He did not go because he was asked to do so by the newspapers that printed his column. He went at the request of the CIA.
Alsop is one of more than 400 American journalists who in the past twenty‑five years have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. Some of these journalists relationships with the Agency were tacit; some were explicit. There was cooperation, accommodation and overlap. Journalists provided a full range of clandestine servicesfrom simple intelligence gathering to serving as go‑betweens with spies in Communist countries. Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors without‑portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested in the derring‑do of the spy business as in filing articles; and, the smallest category, full‑time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad. In many instances, CIA documents show, journalists were engaged to perform tasks for the CIA with the consent of the managements of Americas leading news organizations.
The history of the CIAs involvement with the American press continues to be shrouded by an official policy of obfuscation and deception for the following principal reasons:
■ The use of journalists has been among the most productive means of intelligence‑gathering employed by the CIA. Although the Agency has cut back sharply on the use of reporters since 1973 primarily as a result of pressure from the media), some journalist‑operatives are still posted abroad.
■ Further investigation into the matter, CIA officials say, would inevitably reveal a series of embarrassing relationships in the 1950s and 1960s with some of the most powerful organizations and individuals in American journalism.
Among the executives who lent their cooperation to the Agency were Williarn Paley of the Columbia Broadcasting System, Henry Luce of Tirne Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger of the New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the LouisviIle Courier‑Journal, and James Copley of the Copley News Service. Other organizations which cooperated with the CIA include the American Broadcasting Company, the National Broadcasting Company, the Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps‑Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual Broadcasting System, the Miami Herald and the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald‑Tribune.
By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with the New York Times, CBS and Time Inc.
The CIAs use of the American news media has been much more extensive than Agency officials have acknowledged publicly or in closed sessions with members of Congress. The general outlines of what happened are indisputable; the specifics are harder to come by. CIA sources hint that a particular journalist was trafficking all over Eastern Europe for the Agency; the journalist says no, he just had lunch with the station chief. CIA sources say flatly that a well‑known ABC correspondent worked for the Agency through 1973; they refuse to identify him. A high‑level CIA official with a prodigious memory says that the New York Times provided cover for about ten CIA operatives between 1950 and 1966; he does not know who they were, or who in the newspapers management made the arrangements.
CONTINUED...
http://www.carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php
And then George H.W. Bush became head of CIA and the subject sank from the front page faster than one can type: "Orwell."
Vielen Dank, Jocko. Reichen immer reicher.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nah--he's not Agency, although they've used him from time to time. He's straight ONI.
msanthrope
Feb 2015
#83
I think that is why Dennis Kucinich is stomped into the dust every time he gains a slight
GoneFishin
Feb 2015
#67
Makes one wonder, especially considering who Uncle Sam has done business with.
Octafish
Feb 2015
#28
The CIA is mucking about world wide picking winners and losers in the interest of crony capitalism.
Enthusiast
Feb 2015
#12
It wasn't being used as a homophobic slur when I used it. I don't play that.
Enthusiast
Feb 2015
#58
I was pretty sure you weren't using it to mean that, but a lot of people do.
Jamastiene
Feb 2015
#59
Marked this as one of those things that we suspected and are grateful that someone confirmed.
Baitball Blogger
Feb 2015
#27
It's interesting. I generally check DU first thing every morning for my news.
closeupready
Feb 2015
#31
I mostly trust DU because if a news item does not seem relevant or does not seem to fit or
JDPriestly
Feb 2015
#48
Russian media is probably no better than ours, but we don't follow Russian media, so it is
JDPriestly
Feb 2015
#50
We can only hope that journalists with terminal diseases will come forth as a deed to society.
YOHABLO
Feb 2015
#45
So because one TV station's public advocate wrote that some reporting might have been biased...
Major Nikon
Feb 2015
#102
He does. He claims that his book doesn't get media coverage despite being a bestseller.
DetlefK
Feb 2015
#61
I never said that. I said that he made up the claims about a plot to suppress coverage of his book.
DetlefK
Feb 2015
#63
Given the extent to which they have gone to propagandize and corrupt the media I think it
GoneFishin
Feb 2015
#69
Spent part of his career being a voice that helped to "drive nations toward war"
NCTraveler
Feb 2015
#74