Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Bait and Switch [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)29. ...because this "robust" global market...
...is working so well now that the TPP will only make it better.
Study Reveals Massive Job Loss in South Korea-U.S. Trade Deal
A new Economic Policy Institute study reveals the harsh reality of the over-hyped and job-killing Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) and warns of the further potential job loss the Trans-Pacific Partnership would inflict upon the American middle class.
Instead of increasing U.S. exports from $10 billion to $11 billion and supporting 70,000 American jobs from increased goods exports alone, as the White house promised, U.S. domestic exports to South Korean fell $3.5 billion and 40,000 American jobs were lost in KORUSs first year. While the KORUS deal has increased the already-massive U.S. trade deficit and slashed American jobs, imports from South Korea have jumped by $5.8 billion, a nearly 40 percent increase.
Estimates for 2013 suggest no reversal in the trend.
Policymakers need to stop negotiating trade deals that hurt the U.S. economy, said Robert E. Scott, the studys author and EPIs Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy Research. Unless free trade agreements reduce our too-high trade deficits, they wont have a net positive effect on U.S. employment. This isnt a radical stance on tradeits textbook economics.
Despite job loss already caused by KORUS, the Obama administration is negotiating yet another flawed trade agreement that involves more than a dozen Asian countries, including South Korea. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), according to the study, would significantly increase the threat that rapidly-growing trade deficits and job losses in the United States would be locked in if the TPP is completed.
http://www.goiam.org/index.php/imail/latest/11721-study-reveals-massive-job-loss-in-south-korea-us-trade-deal
A new Economic Policy Institute study reveals the harsh reality of the over-hyped and job-killing Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) and warns of the further potential job loss the Trans-Pacific Partnership would inflict upon the American middle class.
Instead of increasing U.S. exports from $10 billion to $11 billion and supporting 70,000 American jobs from increased goods exports alone, as the White house promised, U.S. domestic exports to South Korean fell $3.5 billion and 40,000 American jobs were lost in KORUSs first year. While the KORUS deal has increased the already-massive U.S. trade deficit and slashed American jobs, imports from South Korea have jumped by $5.8 billion, a nearly 40 percent increase.
Estimates for 2013 suggest no reversal in the trend.
Policymakers need to stop negotiating trade deals that hurt the U.S. economy, said Robert E. Scott, the studys author and EPIs Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy Research. Unless free trade agreements reduce our too-high trade deficits, they wont have a net positive effect on U.S. employment. This isnt a radical stance on tradeits textbook economics.
Despite job loss already caused by KORUS, the Obama administration is negotiating yet another flawed trade agreement that involves more than a dozen Asian countries, including South Korea. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), according to the study, would significantly increase the threat that rapidly-growing trade deficits and job losses in the United States would be locked in if the TPP is completed.
http://www.goiam.org/index.php/imail/latest/11721-study-reveals-massive-job-loss-in-south-korea-us-trade-deal
Capital will ALWAYS be able to out run Human Rights, Labor Regulation, and Environmental Protections.........
UNLESS our governments slow them down and advocate for the working classes of the World.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think it will incentivize doctors to move problem patients on to somebody else.
magical thyme
Feb 2015
#10
On the other hand, some doctors are making a killing out of treating Medicare patients.
1monster
Feb 2015
#25
It is a good website with general good analysis - This one I slightly disagree with
newthinking
Feb 2015
#22
HHS Sylvia Burwell is from Walmart so it's not surprising that the plan is to "Walmartize" Medicare
Teamster Jeff
Feb 2015
#61
I am glad he is bringing these things up. But the sceptic in me sees this as Preparing for the after
newthinking
Feb 2015
#24
we could have free college today, if it were a priority. but we won't, whether engaged in the
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#34
no, it won't. because contrary to the rhetoric and talking points, capital doesn't need a lot
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#40
yep. because everyone agrees we need more war! at least, everyone who 'matters' agrees.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#44
I wonder if 'promoted free Community College' has been added to that laughable List yet?
Marr
Feb 2015
#41
So Obama does not care about us, only about his own power and wealth. Sounds like a tea party
pampango
Feb 2015
#45
I'm saying we all disagree with one policy or another but most do not accuse of him of lying and
pampango
Feb 2015
#50
"This sort of sleight of hand does involve lying." "That doesn't make me a Tea Party Republican."
pampango
Feb 2015
#55
Of course not. You can disagree with a policy without calling him a liar. We all do it.
pampango
Feb 2015
#62
"I don't like the idea of Obama engaging in the politics of distraction to get a political thing
pampango
Feb 2015
#66
Lies upon lies upon lies. Yes, bait and switch is the corporate MO.
woo me with science
Feb 2015
#51
Obama has always pulled high favorability numbers from Liberal Democrats.
great white snark
Feb 2015
#75