Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 08:15 AM Apr 2012

John Edwards is a creep, not a criminal [View all]


By David Horsey

April 27, 2012, 5:00 a.m.
The more I read about John Edwards’ shenanigans during the 2008 presidential campaign, the more I’m convinced he is a mirror-gazing, fork-tongued, tramp-chasing weasel. But the more I read about the federal case against him, the more sure I am that he does not deserve to go to jail.

The trial to determine if Edwards broke campaign finance laws has begun and it promises to be as lurid and titillating as Ken Starr’s vivid account of President Clinton’s fling with Monica Lewinsky. Edwards’ mistress, Rielle Hunter, is likely to take the stand. Expect her to add juicy details about how she and Edwards conducted a trans-continental affair right under the noses of the candidate’s cancer-stricken wife and the entire national press corps.

Already, we have heard several days of testimony from former Edwards aide Andrew Young. Repeating the story he had already spilled in a tell-all book, Young told how he found rich donors to pony up more than $900,000 to pay for Rielle’s house, BMW and silence. Aiming to hit a big payday by loyally clinging to Edwards’ coattails, Young funneled the hush money through his own wife’s checking account while claiming it was he, not Edwards, who fathered Rielle’s baby.

Young’s sometimes shaky testimony was pounced upon by the Edwards defense team. They contend Young did much of the dirty work on his own and that a big chunk of the money went to pay for his $1.5-million house. Whatever the truth may be, one thing that appears reasonably clear is that Edwards and Young are both conniving creeps.

<snip>

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-john-edwards-20120426,0,5155519.story
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And this trial is a Republican wet dream lame54 Apr 2012 #1
Not really RZM Apr 2012 #26
I would agree deutsey Apr 2012 #2
Two words edhopper Apr 2012 #4
Crime? Millions of dollars flow from foreign funders through US companies to buy politicians. leveymg Apr 2012 #3
However, the idea that anyone could give a politician (directly or indirectly) karynnj Apr 2012 #9
One has to wonder how isolated Edwards' "blackmail potential" really is. leveymg Apr 2012 #16
Maybe he's not a criminal but I'll wait until after the trial before I declare him innocent. n/t Little Star Apr 2012 #5
There's a difference, of course, between "not guilty" and "innocent." Bake Apr 2012 #14
Your right. Sorry I used the wrong wording... Little Star Apr 2012 #17
The man is entitled to the presumption of innocence. kestrel91316 Apr 2012 #18
I should have said.... Little Star Apr 2012 #21
Hey, we are all entitled to our opinions because in truth only the justice system must remain kestrel91316 Apr 2012 #29
me too, on assuming the RW is always guilty, lol! Little Star Apr 2012 #31
Justice system impartial? marions ghost Apr 2012 #36
Personally I think he is a creepy criminal madokie Apr 2012 #6
I agree. HappyMe Apr 2012 #12
but the system marions ghost Apr 2012 #37
So right you are madokie Apr 2012 #40
The case for the jury will be which pathological liar do you believe. MoonRiver Apr 2012 #7
Not sure about that karynnj Apr 2012 #10
The first thing ProSense Apr 2012 #15
John Ensign was charged with a crime and tried?? News to me. kestrel91316 Apr 2012 #19
Very well stated karynnj Apr 2012 #20
+1 Little Star Apr 2012 #22
I agree loyalsister Apr 2012 #32
now that Young has testified under oath magical thyme Apr 2012 #43
she isn't going to testify dsc Apr 2012 #44
Agreed. And it leaves me wondering... magical thyme Apr 2012 #8
It's not TPTB, it is something much more plebian karynnj Apr 2012 #13
I didn't mean democrats by TPTB magical thyme Apr 2012 #28
I was refering to the TPTB karynnj Apr 2012 #38
you wrote that he was "a party favorite" magical thyme Apr 2012 #42
I think an Edwards presidency would have been great for R's loyalsister Apr 2012 #33
I'll wait to hear from more witnesses and maybe to see more documentary evidence. GodlessBiker Apr 2012 #11
He's at least a creep, maybe also a criminal. undeterred Apr 2012 #23
Why can't he be both? Capt. Obvious Apr 2012 #24
He sure can be. I just posted this because I think it's cali Apr 2012 #27
Luckily for him, he'll get a jury to decide his fate Egalitariat Apr 2012 #25
"John Edwards is a creep, not a criminal" Spazito Apr 2012 #30
None of us are experts in the campaign finance laws. Nye Bevan Apr 2012 #34
It's a NC tradition to play melm00se Apr 2012 #35
note the party affiliation of each dsc Apr 2012 #45
not really melm00se Apr 2012 #47
during his tenure we had dsc Apr 2012 #48
There were no Super Pacs back in the day. n/t cr8tvlde Apr 2012 #39
"Guilt and innocence turn on one question eridani Apr 2012 #41
Ds get big news stories BEFORE trial, with hints they'll walk. Festivito Apr 2012 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»John Edwards is a creep, ...