New Poll Reveals Serious Liabilities for Hillary

[geek tragedy]

70. Here's the evidence it was from Warrenistas, which you will likely ignore

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/elizabeth-warren-poll-hillary-clinton-2016-election-114754.html

A group of major liberal donors who want Elizabeth Warren to run for president have paid for a poll intended to show that Hillary Clinton does not excite the Democratic base and would be vulnerable in a 2016 general election.

If you are unfamiliar with the concept of how questions in a poll may induce bias in the responses they get, I suggest you educate yourself on the subject matter before asking such inane questions.

Here's a starter.

http://www.people-press.org/methodology/questionnaire-design/question-wording/

Similarly, it is important to consider whether certain words may be viewed as biased or potentially offensive to some respondents, as well as the emotional reaction that some words may provoke. For example, in a 2005 Pew Research survey, 51% of respondents said they favored “making it legal for doctors to give terminally ill patients the means to end their lives” but only 44% said they favored “making it legal for doctors to assist terminally ill patients in committing suicide.” Although both versions of the question are asking about the same thing, the reaction of respondents was different. In another example, respondents have reacted differently to questions using the word “welfare” as opposed to the more generic “assistance to the poor.” Several experiments have shown that there is much greater public support for expanding “assistance to the poor” than for expanding “welfare.”

Now, if your purpose is to test anti-Hillary attack ad messages, this poll is pretty good at that. If your purpose is to measure Clinton's overall popularity, it's a miserable failure.