Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Editor of major German newspaper says he planted stories for CIA [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)95. Capitalism's Invisible Army
THE ORIGINS OF THE OVERCLASS
by Steve Kangas
The wealthy have always used many methods to accumulate wealth, but it was not until the mid-1970s that these methods coalesced into a superbly organized, cohesive and efficient machine. After 1975, it became greater than the sum of its parts, a smooth flowing organization of advocacy groups, lobbyists, think tanks, conservative foundations, and PR firms that hurtled the richest 1 percent into the stratosphere.
The origins of this machine, interestingly enough, can be traced back to the CIA. This is not to say the machine is a formal CIA operation, complete with code name and signed documents. (Although such evidence may yet surface and previously unthinkable domestic operations such as MK-ULTRA, CHAOS and MOCKINGBIRD show this to be a distinct possibility.) But what we do know already indicts the CIA strongly enough. Its principle creators were Irving Kristol, Paul Weyrich, William Simon, Richard Mellon Scaife, Frank Shakespeare, William F. Buckley, Jr., the Rockefeller family, and more. Almost all the machine's creators had CIA backgrounds.
SNIP...
How did this alliance start? The CIA has always recruited the nations elite: millionaire businessmen, Wall Street brokers, members of the national news media, and Ivy League scholars. During World War II, General "Wild Bill" Donovan became chief of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA. Donovan recruited so exclusively from the nations rich and powerful that members eventually came to joke that "OSS" stood for "Oh, so social!"
SNIP...
Historically, the CIA and societys elite have been one and the same people. This means that their interests and goals are one and the same as well. Perhaps the most frequent description of the intelligence community is the "old boy network," where members socialize, talk shop, conduct business and tap each other for favors well outside the formal halls of government.
CONTINUED...
http://www.american-buddha.com/illum.originsofoverclass.htm
Going from who gets ahead nationally and internationally implies there is a very generous amount of nepotism.
by Steve Kangas
The wealthy have always used many methods to accumulate wealth, but it was not until the mid-1970s that these methods coalesced into a superbly organized, cohesive and efficient machine. After 1975, it became greater than the sum of its parts, a smooth flowing organization of advocacy groups, lobbyists, think tanks, conservative foundations, and PR firms that hurtled the richest 1 percent into the stratosphere.
The origins of this machine, interestingly enough, can be traced back to the CIA. This is not to say the machine is a formal CIA operation, complete with code name and signed documents. (Although such evidence may yet surface and previously unthinkable domestic operations such as MK-ULTRA, CHAOS and MOCKINGBIRD show this to be a distinct possibility.) But what we do know already indicts the CIA strongly enough. Its principle creators were Irving Kristol, Paul Weyrich, William Simon, Richard Mellon Scaife, Frank Shakespeare, William F. Buckley, Jr., the Rockefeller family, and more. Almost all the machine's creators had CIA backgrounds.
SNIP...
How did this alliance start? The CIA has always recruited the nations elite: millionaire businessmen, Wall Street brokers, members of the national news media, and Ivy League scholars. During World War II, General "Wild Bill" Donovan became chief of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA. Donovan recruited so exclusively from the nations rich and powerful that members eventually came to joke that "OSS" stood for "Oh, so social!"
SNIP...
Historically, the CIA and societys elite have been one and the same people. This means that their interests and goals are one and the same as well. Perhaps the most frequent description of the intelligence community is the "old boy network," where members socialize, talk shop, conduct business and tap each other for favors well outside the formal halls of government.
CONTINUED...
http://www.american-buddha.com/illum.originsofoverclass.htm
Going from who gets ahead nationally and internationally implies there is a very generous amount of nepotism.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nah--he's not Agency, although they've used him from time to time. He's straight ONI.
msanthrope
Feb 2015
#83
I think that is why Dennis Kucinich is stomped into the dust every time he gains a slight
GoneFishin
Feb 2015
#67
Makes one wonder, especially considering who Uncle Sam has done business with.
Octafish
Feb 2015
#28
The CIA is mucking about world wide picking winners and losers in the interest of crony capitalism.
Enthusiast
Feb 2015
#12
It wasn't being used as a homophobic slur when I used it. I don't play that.
Enthusiast
Feb 2015
#58
I was pretty sure you weren't using it to mean that, but a lot of people do.
Jamastiene
Feb 2015
#59
Marked this as one of those things that we suspected and are grateful that someone confirmed.
Baitball Blogger
Feb 2015
#27
It's interesting. I generally check DU first thing every morning for my news.
closeupready
Feb 2015
#31
I mostly trust DU because if a news item does not seem relevant or does not seem to fit or
JDPriestly
Feb 2015
#48
Russian media is probably no better than ours, but we don't follow Russian media, so it is
JDPriestly
Feb 2015
#50
We can only hope that journalists with terminal diseases will come forth as a deed to society.
YOHABLO
Feb 2015
#45
So because one TV station's public advocate wrote that some reporting might have been biased...
Major Nikon
Feb 2015
#102
He does. He claims that his book doesn't get media coverage despite being a bestseller.
DetlefK
Feb 2015
#61
I never said that. I said that he made up the claims about a plot to suppress coverage of his book.
DetlefK
Feb 2015
#63
Given the extent to which they have gone to propagandize and corrupt the media I think it
GoneFishin
Feb 2015
#69
Spent part of his career being a voice that helped to "drive nations toward war"
NCTraveler
Feb 2015
#74