Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New Poll Reveals Serious Liabilities for Hillary [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)111. Poll or no poll, her liability is that her agenda is MALIGNANT.
This nation cannot AFFORD another lying, looting, warmongering corporatist.
She is a Third Way menace to democracy. If corporate Democrats succeed in ramming her down our throats as the Dem candidate in 2016, they will have ensured that the corporate agenda continues no matter which candidate wins.
Corporate Republicans and the corporate Third Way are not just another flavor of politician within an essentially functioning representative government. They are building perpetual war, a police and surveillance state, and using our own laws and intelligence agencies to empower corporations over the will of the American people to dismantle democracy itself.
Hillary Clinton's leading role in drafting the TPP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101667554
Hillary Clinton and Trade Deals: That Giant Sucking Sound
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016101761
Hillary Clinton Cheerleads for Biotech and GMOs
http://www.democraticunderground.com/112772326
Dissecting Hillary Clinton's Neocon Talking Points - Atlantic Interview
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017209519
NYTimes notices Hillary's natural affinity toward the neocons.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025205645
Hillary Clinton, the unrepentant hawk
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024876898
More from Hillary Clinton's State Department: The fascistic TISA (Trade in Services Agreement)
http://m.thenation.com/blog/180572-grassroots-labor-uprising-your-bank
How Hillary Clinton's State Department sold fracking to the world
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251376647
Hillary Clinton Sides with NSA over Snowden Disclosures
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101695441
On the NSA, Hillary Clinton Is Either a Fool or a Liar
http://m.thenation.com/article/180564-nsa-hillary-clinton-either-fool-or-liar
Corporate Warfare: Hillary Clinton admits role in Honduran coup aftermath
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025601610#post29
The Bill and Hillary Clinton Money Machine Taps Corporate Cash
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025189257
Hillary's Privatization Plan: TISA kept more secret than the TPP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014829628
Hillary Clinton criticizes Obama's foreign policy 'failure'; strongly defends Israel
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014867136
Some of Hillary Clinton's statements on Social Security.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024379279
Hillary Clinton's GOLDMAN SACHS PROBLEM.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025049343
Ring of Fire: Hillary Clinton - The Perfect Republican Candidate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017209285
How Americans Need Answers From Hillary Clinton On TPP, KXL, Wall St & More
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017181611
Hillary Clinton Left Out By Liberal Donor Club
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025809071
Why Wall Street Loves Hillary
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016106575
Hillary Clinton: Neocon-lite
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101684986
Interactive graphic of Hillary Clinton's connections to the Forbes top 400 (Follow link in post)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025824981#post9
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Actually, I think the "2014" date in the text is a typo & should be 2015.
Jackpine Radical
Feb 2015
#7
I'm realizing a LOT that's funny about this poll. See my Post 71 for my current view.
Jackpine Radical
Feb 2015
#76
Interesting reading. Thanks for posting. Should give heart to the Sanders
KingCharlemagne
Feb 2015
#4
That's a good point about how a lot of people come to the interent to seek out
KingCharlemagne
Feb 2015
#29
At this point, I'll settle for just turning away from where we're going.
Jackpine Radical
Feb 2015
#100
This is a push poll/test of attack themes, not a legitimate measure of public opinion
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#12
Have to wait for what 2016 looks like. (Werewolf reminded me how Julian Bond said BO was to
appalachiablue
Feb 2015
#35
What I thought also. I am fairly neutral on Hillary but she is the candidate to beat.
yellowcanine
Feb 2015
#15
In your defense the Politico article is not very well written at best and biased at worse.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#115
The poll is most likely a piece of trash. That's not the main question. Politico,
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#120
Polls should not make statements about candidates as part of the questioning.
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#64
These are the push poll questions the Republicans will ask, and they won't just ask them
JDPriestly
Feb 2015
#30
I got that vibe too, but still, HRC appears to be very friendly toward the banks and Wall Street. nt
ZombieHorde
Feb 2015
#33
That rhetoric belongs in a political campaign, NOT a poll trying to measure public opinion
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#67
LMAO. You can't even admit this crap poll was commissioned by the Hillary Haters
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#74
The fact that someone told Politico that rich Sen Warren donors funded the poll is
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#116
It does show how opinions change about a politicians when a voter is informed about the politician.
Autumn
Feb 2015
#105
And this covers just domestic issues. Her negatives on her foreign policy record are far worse.
leveymg
Feb 2015
#14
Nope, not concerned. This is like all those polls that say that folks prefer progressive policies.
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#24
that's because of things like guns . it's "safer" to vote on a specific issue such as minimum wage
JI7
Feb 2015
#77
The article is some of the worst reporting jobs I've seen. They substantiate nothing.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#118
I would like to see the actual questions and also see if they were "loaded" (i.e., biased)
George II
Feb 2015
#37
It's impossible to say what parts are inaccurate since the writer has only paraphrased....
George II
Feb 2015
#50
Poll or no poll, I will vote for the candidate that pushes reigning in Wall Street the most.
Kablooie
Feb 2015
#42
Considering Obama won BOTH of his Presidential elections by the two largest popular vote counts....
George II
Feb 2015
#51
It certainly offers a lot of specifics for anyone to the left of her that decides to run.
raindaddy
Feb 2015
#59
Actually this Poll Reveals Serious Liabilities for the idiots that commissioned it. nt
William769
Feb 2015
#75
Her liabilities are the baggage she's accumulated and her failed attempts to deodorize it.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2015
#78
thanks for the edit. but even 'warrenistas' have a right to do polling and they all have an angel.
TheNutcracker
Feb 2015
#80
Funny how some get their hopes up with push polls like this, part of which was done ONLINE
wyldwolf
Feb 2015
#94
Well, maybe Hillary can use this poll to her advantage in preparing for running. nt
kelliekat44
Feb 2015
#104
Perhaps the poll should have indicated where the candidates poll on national security.
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#106
I'll bet the numbers favor Warren even more a year later, especially after taking on congress!
TheNutcracker
Feb 2015
#119