General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: John Edwards... the REST of the story [View all]karynnj
(60,980 posts)The reason "it gets more amazing" is that you are ignoring everything that does not fit your thesis - including the actual history - such as his Senate record. This is cherry picking the accounts out there. There is plenty to find about Edwards from 1998 to 2012 - so, if you are finding it hard to find things, the reason might be that you are looking for fiction.
Did you read the comments on the DK article? In 2007, JRE was the favorite of posters there. You can see the residual love and respect for Elizabeth. But, it was not necessary to even like Elizabeth, to find that post absolutely despicable. Not to mention, even if you accepted all her points, it still does not mean that Edwards did not do all the things he is alleged to have done.
What is mystifying is that you sound like you were not involved in 2004 or 2008 - and getting interested in more recent years - after the scandal broke - become fascinated by Edwards.