Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bhikkhu

(10,789 posts)
17. Given the rarity of febrile seizures, the sample size is very small
Tue Feb 3, 2015, 01:59 AM
Feb 2015

and the "small increase" could be statistically insignificant. Physically, a febrile seizure most often is a side effect of fever, admittedly frightening but leading to nothing in itself.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think 1998 GP6971 Feb 2015 #1
the study was officially retracted 4-5 years ago. should be easy to find since it was bettyellen Feb 2015 #2
Whoever responds, please include a link! fried eggs Feb 2015 #3
Here's a link to a National Geographic Article xmas74 Feb 2015 #6
National Geographic has changed for the worse. Read all about it here. proverbialwisdom Mar 2015 #143
But still gives the basic answers xmas74 Mar 2015 #146
I found the answer regarding MMR fried eggs Feb 2015 #7
Given the rarity of febrile seizures, the sample size is very small bhikkhu Feb 2015 #17
There is also apparently a... Whiskeytide Feb 2015 #72
Odd thing mercuryblues Feb 2015 #109
Never heard that it was 'settled science'. A lot of people seem to be very concerned about sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #4
Of course you hadn't. NuclearDem Feb 2015 #11
Your post reminded me of the black humor around so-called 'neutron bombs.' (These are KingCharlemagne Feb 2015 #12
I love that idea. And I wouldn't be surprised if it is possible. But killing people for now, seems sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #15
The repugs have an increasingly great concern for human life, pennylane100 Feb 2015 #19
I know what you mean. It's heartwarming, isn't it? GoneFishin Feb 2015 #30
When the "N-Bomb" was the big fear, I advocated we needed an "O & P-Bomb". . . Journeyman Feb 2015 #16
Well then, read this thread Sabrina-tons of great info debunking this nonsense... bettyellen Feb 2015 #36
That's very admirable, DU has always been there to inform the uninformed. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #37
Glad we could be of service regarding this anti- vaxxing bullshit, and I'll just stay on topic- bettyellen Feb 2015 #38
Thank you for the info! zappaman Feb 2015 #39
Thanks, I might do that. Human life, the preservation of it, is something I care about, you'll have sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #41
I'm so sorry to hear DU has failed to educate you- and here in a thread with a so many great links! bettyellen Feb 2015 #44
Like I said, you just don't get it. I may start a thread, as I said. I have had plenty of 'luck' sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #45
Sorry to hear how disgusted you are by so many DUers for trying to discuss vaccinations- bettyellen Feb 2015 #47
I like pancakes and zappaman Feb 2015 #48
Urgle gurlgle why don't people care what I care about- when I care about it?!?!? bettyellen Feb 2015 #49
I'm sorry people don't care about what you care about. I'm sure that must be very sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #68
Trolls gonna troll. NuclearDem Feb 2015 #81
If you need any help with that, let me know! sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #50
Nope. zappaman Feb 2015 #56
Its amazing how they try to derail and misdirect every comment and thread Ramses Feb 2015 #58
Some would rather try picking fights with DUers bettyellen Feb 2015 #118
yes, watching a toddler throw a tantrum is the definition of your response Ramses Feb 2015 #119
Welcome to DU...again! zappaman Feb 2015 #127
Welcome to DU...again! zappaman Feb 2015 #127
some people are just low fact, high opinion posters Sheepshank Feb 2015 #75
That's for sure. The fact is, that right here in this thread, there are advocates of 'eliminating' sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #93
No kidding! gopiscrap Feb 2015 #55
It's also not a settle science to some people that the world is round.... Sheepshank Feb 2015 #69
I agree, I don't listen to the fringe either, and there is nothing more 'fringe' imho, than sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #73
yeah you are always good to come back with "They're trying to shut me up" martyr thing. Sheepshank Feb 2015 #74
It's as if they are consistently having a conversation zappaman Feb 2015 #77
^ ^ ^ oh yeah!! ^ ^ ^ Sheepshank Feb 2015 #84
You mean 'she' don't you? Why not just be honest when you are talking about other people? sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #92
poor poor pitiful me... Sheepshank Feb 2015 #94
And there is that old talking point, for Liberals btw. I think it was Rush who supplied that one. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #103
so now I'm a ditto head for calling you out on your usual MO? That's the real joke here n/t Sheepshank Feb 2015 #112
"Your usual MO". And yours is Personal attacks. People who engage in personal attacks do so sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #113
bwahh haa haa...walking it back? you are wasting my time. Sheepshank Feb 2015 #116
Martyr is not a word limited to right wingers treestar Feb 2015 #136
Apparently once Rushbo uses a word treestar Feb 2015 #135
ain't that just the truth ;) n/t Sheepshank Feb 2015 #142
There is the very definition of irony. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #85
OFFS NuclearDem Feb 2015 #89
I don't care you respond...but be intellectually honest and respond to the subject at hand Sheepshank Feb 2015 #95
The question was prompted by your attack on ME rather than on the proponent of disappearing sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #97
nope..still not being honest. This is your usual go to tactic, and not just on this thread. n/t Sheepshank Feb 2015 #111
Well said. n/t FSogol Feb 2015 #114
there is scientific consensus that vaccines have never been shown to cause autism. La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2015 #71
Anti-vaxxers do tend to selectively ignore that information. NuclearDem Feb 2015 #82
Well you just showed your lack of concern for treestar Feb 2015 #134
The CDC published its findings in 2007. NuclearDem Feb 2015 #5
Excellent! xmas74 Feb 2015 #10
That's a great link too! NuclearDem Feb 2015 #13
My link is the simple go-to link xmas74 Feb 2015 #14
While I don't have a link, I read recently that scientists now believe that KingCharlemagne Feb 2015 #8
As a geneticist, I think chromosomal microduplications and deletions play a large role. Barack_America Feb 2015 #20
There's this (from 1995!) Spider Jerusalem Feb 2015 #21
There is no exact date. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2015 #9
Mid 2000's, as far as I've read bhikkhu Feb 2015 #18
when was it settled DonCoquixote Feb 2015 #22
Kick. 'Cause Manny never came back to acknowledge all the good answers he got...nt SidDithers Feb 2015 #23
I'm sure he'll be back with another OP faulting a certain politician of the Democratic geek tragedy Feb 2015 #24
You said it! treestar Feb 2015 #138
Because we know it's coming, that train is never late geek tragedy Feb 2015 #25
Bingo! nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #34
Maybe Manny has a job? MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #33
More likely, the answers do not validate his narrative... LanternWaste Feb 2015 #83
Personal attack. nt MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #86
So was your question answered? zappaman Feb 2015 #87
Obviously. MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #88
Glad you got your answers! zappaman Feb 2015 #90
Why would ask people to prove a negative? CreekDog Feb 2015 #133
you could have used the google treestar Feb 2015 #137
Another kick, because this is a great thread. I have heard that people have learned a lot sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #43
One thing we learn is who can actually *discuss* things here at a "discussion site," and who snarks villager Feb 2015 #52
You're exactly right. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #53
Always? A Lot? ProfessorGAC Feb 2015 #67
Good links gwheezie Feb 2015 #26
The vaccines are made to go bad because of contrails. randome Feb 2015 #27
where did you go we need you back! snooper2 Feb 2015 #28
There was never a link edhopper Feb 2015 #29
Kick...nt SidDithers Feb 2015 #31
When there was no proof EVER that they do. Avalux Feb 2015 #32
Strictly speaking, never. Vattel Feb 2015 #35
How does one explain the Autistic kids onecaliberal Feb 2015 #54
No one has proven that there is only one cause of autism. Vattel Feb 2015 #59
Autism is genetic. onecaliberal Feb 2015 #62
Dude, seriously. Vattel Feb 2015 #64
Umm... "tobacco has been around almost as long as people" jberryhill Feb 2015 #79
So, did you get the info you were looking for? zappaman Feb 2015 #40
I find myself oddly curious as to how Elizabeth Warren feels about vaccines, LOL. bettyellen Feb 2015 #46
hehe treestar Feb 2015 #140
Every single child of my age cwydro Feb 2015 #42
1998 onecaliberal Feb 2015 #51
When was it settled that brownies don't make my shoes in the middle of the night MattBaggins Feb 2015 #57
Same thing, isn't it? BUT YOU CAN'T PROVE THAT! Incredible thread full of absolute...brownies. randome Feb 2015 #65
2002 Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2015 #60
There was never any real evidence Kurska Feb 2015 #61
A simple Google search. Lex Feb 2015 #63
Probably one of the best ops started on this subject. NCTraveler Feb 2015 #66
it was never established that they do. La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2015 #70
Always. Since the faked study couldn't reproduce results, it was never valid on point Feb 2015 #76
Did you get your answer? zappaman Feb 2015 #78
of course, it has never been settled and can never be "settled..." mike_c Feb 2015 #80
By "settled", I mean "pretty unlikely that we'll find a link" nt MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #91
now you're talking like a scientist.... mike_c Feb 2015 #96
But you, frankly, are the only poster I've read who acknowledges the truth of science: that there is WinkyDink Feb 2015 #132
At 60-ish, I've spent half my life doing science.... mike_c Feb 2015 #141
LOL...Manny and his woo got served. Cali_Democrat Feb 2015 #98
Clearly, you have zero idea of what's going on here MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #99
You're pretty easy to figure out, Manny Cali_Democrat Feb 2015 #100
Amd where have I said otherwise? MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #101
LOL....this thread might be your best yet.... Cali_Democrat Feb 2015 #102
Third Woo Manny. nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #105
LOL! Cali_Democrat Feb 2015 #115
Lolz geek tragedy Feb 2015 #104
Care to weigh in on reply #106 in this thread? Cali_Democrat Feb 2015 #121
There is a bizarre desire by some people to believe MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #122
Manny in 2008: Cali_Democrat Feb 2015 #124
Your point?nt MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #125
No, you see, THIS TIME he was sincere... SidDithers Feb 2015 #110
You were trolling, unless you got amnesia since 2008. geek tragedy Feb 2015 #106
Wow. "Spectrum autism" isn't "true autism"... SidDithers Feb 2015 #107
But a very clear and cogent discussion of how vaccines do not cause autism with detailed geek tragedy Feb 2015 #108
there is no such thing as "Spectrum Autism" - Autism is a Spectrum - that why its official name Douglas Carpenter Feb 2015 #117
The "science" here, as in most of psychology, is terrible. MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #123
there may very well be different types and obviously severity levels of Autism Douglas Carpenter Feb 2015 #126
Should an irritated throat and lung cancer both be pulled into a single diagnosis MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #130
no an irritated throat and lung cancer are obviously not two different types of cancer affected Douglas Carpenter Feb 2015 #131
"You were trolling" JI7 Feb 2015 #120
0 recs joshcryer Feb 2015 #129
I'll be really glad if and when this vaccine BS gets shoved to Creative Speculation or TOS banned steve2470 Feb 2015 #139
In summary, both the official US government stance and the consensus of this thread appears to be... proverbialwisdom Mar 2015 #144
The official government stance relies on multiple analyses of additional research papers, of course. proverbialwisdom Mar 2015 #145
OTOH, much of the DATA is protected & unavailable despite years of FOIA requests. Just read this... proverbialwisdom Mar 2015 #147
Upcoming event. proverbialwisdom Mar 2015 #148
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question: when was it set...»Reply #17