General Discussion

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)

96. Link of her losing in 2007, or Hillary supporters saying that she was inevitable?

Reply to wyldwolf (Reply #94)

Tue Feb 3, 2015, 11:37 AM

Feb 2015

Which one you need? There are plenty of both.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

118 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton Holds Early Leads in Swing States [View all] wyldwolf Feb 2015 OP

All name recognition right now madville Feb 2015 #1

It's person recognition wyldwolf Feb 2015 #3

... benz380 Feb 2015 #5

thank you for your input./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #7

Pretty sure vomiting is output./nt AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #23

lol. nt benz380 Feb 2015 #26

What if you vomit in your mouth? /NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #59

Besides stank breath? AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #117

nice Vattel Feb 2015 #111

It's science, yo. /nt AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #113

Zen koan: What is both input and output as well as off-putting? Answer: vomit that is swallowed. Vattel Feb 2015 #114

I'd rather have them inside the tent vomiting out than outside the tent vomiting in Fumesucker Feb 2015 #112

the truth makes you sick. We get it. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #8

LOL!! Dawgs Feb 2015 #13

LOL! wyldwolf Feb 2015 #14

Don't forget to thank Dawgs for his input./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #15

Interesting crutch, this 'name recognition' 'progressives' use to excuse Clinton's popularity wyldwolf Feb 2015 #19

My point is that you should understand how Presidential elections work by now. Dawgs Feb 2015 #18

Couldn't that be said of her would be opponents? /NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #20

Yes. My point is that popularity, regardless of familiarity, goes up and down for all. Dawgs Feb 2015 #24

we're discussing a poll, a snapshot for this period of time wyldwolf Feb 2015 #21

OK. So, to you, this is nothing more than a poll for today. Dawgs Feb 2015 #22

It's a snapshot of the 2016 election. If the 2016 election were RIGHT NOW... wyldwolf Feb 2015 #28

Holy shit. You're serious? Dawgs Feb 2015 #30

Ignoring or denying that which pains you doesn't make it go away. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #36

Ignoring or denying what? I know that leading now doesn't guarantee anything. Dawgs Feb 2015 #40

Post #28. You're denying what I wrote is true? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #42

What? I don't deny that TODAY (which doesn't mean or PROVE anything), Hillary is leading. Dawgs Feb 2015 #47

I said it was a snapshot of today and you went into 'holy shit' ballistic mode. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #56

Considering that I'm enjoying every bit of our little meaningless conversation,.. Dawgs Feb 2015 #61

If you need a nap, we'll be happy to wait for you. Or maybe you need a Snickers? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #63

Hillary was the supposed "shoo in" last time around... CoffeeCat Feb 2015 #89

Agree with everything you said. Caucusing for her here in CO was a dream come true for me . Autumn Feb 2015 #105

It's going to be a eternity for Warren Supporters. William769 Feb 2015 #93

Why? Did she do something that should bother me? n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #95

Do the people recognize her yes vote for the Iraq War? Broward Feb 2015 #16

Didn't stop Joe Biden from being elected vice president twice./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #17

or John Kerry and John Edwards being the ticket in 2004 wyldwolf Feb 2015 #25

It also didn't prevent President Obama from making her SOS./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #27

I live in the swing state of Ohio. SamKnause Feb 2015 #2

thank you for your input. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #4

You are most welcome. SamKnause Feb 2015 #9

thank you for your input./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #6

You are most welcome. SamKnause Feb 2015 #10

Likewise/NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #12

Thank you for your input. (truly) RiverLover Feb 2015 #11

Thank you. SamKnause Feb 2015 #74

Great post. This is key. RiverLover Feb 2015 #101

Are you saying you will vote for the Green Party because you will not vote Thinkingabout Feb 2015 #45

Thanks for your input. SamKnause Feb 2015 #64

nor will waste a vote on a green party candidate, don't agree with them, but you may as well Thinkingabout Feb 2015 #107

You are free to vote for whomever you choose. SamKnause Feb 2015 #108

If this is the best you know about Hillary then you have lots more to research. Thinkingabout Feb 2015 #109

How do you know how many years of research I have done ? SamKnause Feb 2015 #110

You are the one who said you did research, perhaps before you start jumping to conclusions you need Thinkingabout Feb 2015 #115

I think you are the one that is confused. SamKnause Feb 2015 #116

IF the only thing you could come up was a negative because she voted yes Thinkingabout Feb 2015 #118

Polling early 2007: HRC vs. Republicans AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #29

those numbers a weaker than todays wyldwolf Feb 2015 #31

I don't think "uncomfortable" is the right word for how many of us feel. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #34

Ignoring or denying that which pains you doesn't make it go away. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #35

Not sure what you're referring to, but okay. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #37

Ignoring or denying or "acting like you don't know" that which pains you doesn't make it go away. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #38

I know that today's numbers don't mean shit for anyone or anything. Dawgs Feb 2015 #43

ooh, your use of profanity. Getting heated, are you? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #51

"Profanity", "Tantrum"? How old are you? n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #53

I'm just speaking in terms you'll understand. Do you need a nap? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #54

I understand alright. Instead of having an adult discussion where you make arguments.. Dawgs Feb 2015 #73

... you resort to childish tantrums wyldwolf Feb 2015 #77

Except I never had one. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #79

until you saw these poll numbers. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #81

Nope. You're pollings numbers only make me happy. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #84

oh, good! We're in agreement. Great numbers for Hillary. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #86

Yep. Great numbers for TODAY. We've agreed on that many times. Dawgs Feb 2015 #102

then why are you so bothered at them being posted? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #103

I'm not bothered with them being posted at all. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #104

This message was self-deleted by its author wyldwolf Feb 2015 #48

We need to be patient. Many posters are in the first stage of the grieving process./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #39

LOL!!!! "First stage" in February of 2015 (20 months before election). Dawgs Feb 2015 #41

There are five stages to Elisabeth Kubler Ross' model. You have four more steps. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #44

Denial of what? Please explain. Dawgs Feb 2015 #50

Her pending presidency. You're welcome./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #55

Relief finally. Thank you. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #57

you're in desperate denial, trying to disguise it as amusement. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #46

Denial of what? Please explain. Dawgs Feb 2015 #49

I explained it above before you went 'holy shit' ballistic. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #60

Uh, saying 'shit' is not going ballistic. Dawgs Feb 2015 #67

But 'Holy Shit' with exclamation points? Anger management. Google it. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #75

Same applies for 'Holy Shit' with exclamation points. Dawgs Feb 2015 #78

Saying 'holy shit' is being an adult? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #88

Rasmussen is a shill Republican front outfit but you know that./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #32

Good for her. She won on THAT day. Dawgs Feb 2015 #33

and every other day polled so far. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #66

and she lost the nomination in 2008. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #68

to a Democrat. We're discussing polling against Republicans. Try to keep up. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #72

Losing the nomination to a Democrat makes polls against Republicans irrelevant. Dawgs Feb 2015 #76

She hasn't lost the 2016 nomination. No, you're lagging behind. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #80

Yet. And, way ahead of you. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #82

who's she losing it to? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #85

Don't know yet, and heard the same arguments in 2007. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #87

Better find out soon. The names so far haven't panned out. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #91

Heard the same thing in 2007. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #92

Link? No, how silly of me to ask. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #94

Link of her losing in 2007, or Hillary supporters saying that she was inevitable? Dawgs Feb 2015 #96

to you hearing anyone saying challenges had not panned out. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #100

Thank YOU for ^^^dose of reality. RiverLover Feb 2015 #52

Kick & highly recommended. William769 Feb 2015 #58

Good. Anyone but a Republican in 2016. JaneyVee Feb 2015 #62

Yes, because she's the only Dem running! CoffeeCat Feb 2015 #65

Nothing is preventing anybody from challenging her, except fear./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #70

June 2007: HRC vs. Republicans AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #69

that's right. She beat all Republicans in polling then, as well. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #71

Very consistent if I might say so myself. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #83

How that work out again? AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #98

Who ya got in '16? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #99

SsshhaaaWing! underpants Feb 2015 #90

I wish pollsters would stop referring to PA as a swing state in presidential elections LonePirate Feb 2015 #97

That, Mr. Anderson, is the sound of inevitability. n/t Orsino Feb 2015 #106