Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Autistic woman's heart-wrenching Facebook post wins the "anti-vaxxing" argument [View all]Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)22. Juror #3 is missing the point here...
The facts on vaccines and autism have been around since the late 90s. They have been studied NUMEROUS times, with the same outcome. It's been discussed and decided. How the fuck can you make an ignorant asshat believe something that they REFUSE to believe? Facts in their face, must be a shill for big pharma.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Autistic woman's heart-wrenching Facebook post wins the "anti-vaxxing" argument [View all]
KamaAina
Feb 2015
OP
Moreover, why isn't the autism rate among adults born in the 50s and 60s higher?
Drunken Irishman
Feb 2015
#24
And what about before the vaccines were available? Were there autistic people then? Has anyone
jwirr
Feb 2015
#37
THAT'S the Elephant in the room that anti-vaxxers don't want to incorporate into their thinking.
BlueJazz
Feb 2015
#42
Because they give many more shots to kids now than they did in the fifties and during a closer
classykaren
Feb 2015
#68
Do you eat bread? Look at the ingredients. It contains an aluminum adjuvant too.
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#16
No, it isn't. It's only present in the multi-dose vials now as a preservative.
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2015
#13
Flu vaccines - including vaccines approved for use by children as young as 6 months
Ms. Toad
Feb 2015
#79
Correct, and diverting money to investigating Wakefield's claims has diverted it away
Warpy
Feb 2015
#33
the anti-science and anti-intellectual culture of this simpleton redneck nation is headache inducing
TimeToEvolve
Feb 2015
#48
But shouldn't the line be drawn between differing opinions and outright stupidity?
alp227
Feb 2015
#80
Really? There is a lot of stupid on here regardless of McCarthy or Wakefield links.
mackerel
Feb 2015
#84
They are all #71, computer or internet or program glitched while they were posting it once.
uppityperson
Feb 2015
#82
The vaccines is protection for our children, this should be a no-brainer. I am a great fan of
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#78