General Discussion

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

118. IF the only thing you could come up was a negative because she voted yes

Tue Feb 3, 2015, 11:39 PM

Feb 2015

On IVR and since she and Kissinger both held the office of SOS and she has respect for him, this is pretty shallow on her record. You stated you had already extensive researched Hillary, go back to your post and see what you posted, you also replied about the "years", I am not confused, I just happen to read your post.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

118 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton Holds Early Leads in Swing States [View all] wyldwolf Feb 2015 OP

All name recognition right now madville Feb 2015 #1

It's person recognition wyldwolf Feb 2015 #3

... benz380 Feb 2015 #5

thank you for your input./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #7

Pretty sure vomiting is output./nt AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #23

lol. nt benz380 Feb 2015 #26

What if you vomit in your mouth? /NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #59

Besides stank breath? AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #117

nice Vattel Feb 2015 #111

It's science, yo. /nt AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #113

Zen koan: What is both input and output as well as off-putting? Answer: vomit that is swallowed. Vattel Feb 2015 #114

I'd rather have them inside the tent vomiting out than outside the tent vomiting in Fumesucker Feb 2015 #112

the truth makes you sick. We get it. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #8

LOL!! Dawgs Feb 2015 #13

LOL! wyldwolf Feb 2015 #14

Don't forget to thank Dawgs for his input./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #15

Interesting crutch, this 'name recognition' 'progressives' use to excuse Clinton's popularity wyldwolf Feb 2015 #19

My point is that you should understand how Presidential elections work by now. Dawgs Feb 2015 #18

Couldn't that be said of her would be opponents? /NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #20

Yes. My point is that popularity, regardless of familiarity, goes up and down for all. Dawgs Feb 2015 #24

we're discussing a poll, a snapshot for this period of time wyldwolf Feb 2015 #21

OK. So, to you, this is nothing more than a poll for today. Dawgs Feb 2015 #22

It's a snapshot of the 2016 election. If the 2016 election were RIGHT NOW... wyldwolf Feb 2015 #28

Holy shit. You're serious? Dawgs Feb 2015 #30

Ignoring or denying that which pains you doesn't make it go away. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #36

Ignoring or denying what? I know that leading now doesn't guarantee anything. Dawgs Feb 2015 #40

Post #28. You're denying what I wrote is true? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #42

What? I don't deny that TODAY (which doesn't mean or PROVE anything), Hillary is leading. Dawgs Feb 2015 #47

I said it was a snapshot of today and you went into 'holy shit' ballistic mode. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #56

Considering that I'm enjoying every bit of our little meaningless conversation,.. Dawgs Feb 2015 #61

If you need a nap, we'll be happy to wait for you. Or maybe you need a Snickers? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #63

Hillary was the supposed "shoo in" last time around... CoffeeCat Feb 2015 #89

Agree with everything you said. Caucusing for her here in CO was a dream come true for me . Autumn Feb 2015 #105

It's going to be a eternity for Warren Supporters. William769 Feb 2015 #93

Why? Did she do something that should bother me? n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #95

Do the people recognize her yes vote for the Iraq War? Broward Feb 2015 #16

Didn't stop Joe Biden from being elected vice president twice./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #17

or John Kerry and John Edwards being the ticket in 2004 wyldwolf Feb 2015 #25

It also didn't prevent President Obama from making her SOS./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #27

I live in the swing state of Ohio. SamKnause Feb 2015 #2

thank you for your input. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #4

You are most welcome. SamKnause Feb 2015 #9

thank you for your input./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #6

You are most welcome. SamKnause Feb 2015 #10

Likewise/NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #12

Thank you for your input. (truly) RiverLover Feb 2015 #11

Thank you. SamKnause Feb 2015 #74

Great post. This is key. RiverLover Feb 2015 #101

Are you saying you will vote for the Green Party because you will not vote Thinkingabout Feb 2015 #45

Thanks for your input. SamKnause Feb 2015 #64

nor will waste a vote on a green party candidate, don't agree with them, but you may as well Thinkingabout Feb 2015 #107

You are free to vote for whomever you choose. SamKnause Feb 2015 #108

If this is the best you know about Hillary then you have lots more to research. Thinkingabout Feb 2015 #109

How do you know how many years of research I have done ? SamKnause Feb 2015 #110

You are the one who said you did research, perhaps before you start jumping to conclusions you need Thinkingabout Feb 2015 #115

I think you are the one that is confused. SamKnause Feb 2015 #116

IF the only thing you could come up was a negative because she voted yes Thinkingabout Feb 2015 #118

Polling early 2007: HRC vs. Republicans AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #29

those numbers a weaker than todays wyldwolf Feb 2015 #31

I don't think "uncomfortable" is the right word for how many of us feel. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #34

Ignoring or denying that which pains you doesn't make it go away. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #35

Not sure what you're referring to, but okay. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #37

Ignoring or denying or "acting like you don't know" that which pains you doesn't make it go away. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #38

I know that today's numbers don't mean shit for anyone or anything. Dawgs Feb 2015 #43

ooh, your use of profanity. Getting heated, are you? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #51

"Profanity", "Tantrum"? How old are you? n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #53

I'm just speaking in terms you'll understand. Do you need a nap? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #54

I understand alright. Instead of having an adult discussion where you make arguments.. Dawgs Feb 2015 #73

... you resort to childish tantrums wyldwolf Feb 2015 #77

Except I never had one. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #79

until you saw these poll numbers. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #81

Nope. You're pollings numbers only make me happy. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #84

oh, good! We're in agreement. Great numbers for Hillary. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #86

Yep. Great numbers for TODAY. We've agreed on that many times. Dawgs Feb 2015 #102

then why are you so bothered at them being posted? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #103

I'm not bothered with them being posted at all. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #104

This message was self-deleted by its author wyldwolf Feb 2015 #48

We need to be patient. Many posters are in the first stage of the grieving process./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #39

LOL!!!! "First stage" in February of 2015 (20 months before election). Dawgs Feb 2015 #41

There are five stages to Elisabeth Kubler Ross' model. You have four more steps. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #44

Denial of what? Please explain. Dawgs Feb 2015 #50

Her pending presidency. You're welcome./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #55

Relief finally. Thank you. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #57

you're in desperate denial, trying to disguise it as amusement. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #46

Denial of what? Please explain. Dawgs Feb 2015 #49

I explained it above before you went 'holy shit' ballistic. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #60

Uh, saying 'shit' is not going ballistic. Dawgs Feb 2015 #67

But 'Holy Shit' with exclamation points? Anger management. Google it. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #75

Same applies for 'Holy Shit' with exclamation points. Dawgs Feb 2015 #78

Saying 'holy shit' is being an adult? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #88

Rasmussen is a shill Republican front outfit but you know that./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #32

Good for her. She won on THAT day. Dawgs Feb 2015 #33

and every other day polled so far. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #66

and she lost the nomination in 2008. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #68

to a Democrat. We're discussing polling against Republicans. Try to keep up. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #72

Losing the nomination to a Democrat makes polls against Republicans irrelevant. Dawgs Feb 2015 #76

She hasn't lost the 2016 nomination. No, you're lagging behind. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #80

Yet. And, way ahead of you. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #82

who's she losing it to? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #85

Don't know yet, and heard the same arguments in 2007. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #87

Better find out soon. The names so far haven't panned out. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #91

Heard the same thing in 2007. n/t Dawgs Feb 2015 #92

Link? No, how silly of me to ask. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #94

Link of her losing in 2007, or Hillary supporters saying that she was inevitable? Dawgs Feb 2015 #96

to you hearing anyone saying challenges had not panned out. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #100

Thank YOU for ^^^dose of reality. RiverLover Feb 2015 #52

Kick & highly recommended. William769 Feb 2015 #58

Good. Anyone but a Republican in 2016. JaneyVee Feb 2015 #62

Yes, because she's the only Dem running! CoffeeCat Feb 2015 #65

Nothing is preventing anybody from challenging her, except fear./NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #70

June 2007: HRC vs. Republicans AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #69

that's right. She beat all Republicans in polling then, as well. wyldwolf Feb 2015 #71

Very consistent if I might say so myself. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #83

How that work out again? AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #98

Who ya got in '16? wyldwolf Feb 2015 #99

SsshhaaaWing! underpants Feb 2015 #90

I wish pollsters would stop referring to PA as a swing state in presidential elections LonePirate Feb 2015 #97

That, Mr. Anderson, is the sound of inevitability. n/t Orsino Feb 2015 #106