Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dilby

(2,273 posts)
10. So, there are tons of Anti-science GMO's are bad for you people who will donate to her as well.
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 03:36 PM
Feb 2015

What is the difference? Just because someone is anti science when it comes to vaccines, GMO or even the whole Organic is better for you bullshit movement, it doesn't mean you can't take their money.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Incoming perfect shitstorm! NuclearDem Feb 2015 #1
Naaah. They're donors, but they aren't real "heavy hitters." MADem Feb 2015 #8
Please do not politicize public health. DearAbby Feb 2015 #2
And Hillary's response: JaneyVee Feb 2015 #3
Oh great. HappyMe Feb 2015 #4
I ask this guestion once again olddots Feb 2015 #5
is this all about single issue voters? Sheepshank Feb 2015 #6
I do not want Hillary to be President, Maedhros Feb 2015 #7
I Don't Either... WillyT Feb 2015 #12
Here's what Clinton had to say zappaman Feb 2015 #9
"The science is clear: The earth is round, the sky is blue, and vaccines work and whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #18
I don't see that quote. zappaman Feb 2015 #21
Man, you're really desperate to find a reason to justify Hillary Hate. You're embarrassing yourself, geek tragedy Feb 2015 #29
She's a tool whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #32
okay, so this isn't about the donors it's just that you think Clinton sucks horribly and geek tragedy Feb 2015 #33
Try as you will to reduce it to irrational hatred whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #34
whatever, if you were shown Warren or Sanders donors who were ant-vax you wouldn't give a shit geek tragedy Feb 2015 #35
See, this is where you got it all wrong whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #36
and you simply can't process the difference between (a) criticizing geek tragedy Feb 2015 #37
Do you think Koch donations are noteworthy? whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #38
How much money has Hillary taken from the Koch brothers? geek tragedy Feb 2015 #40
Here's the difference between us whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #41
That ship sailed a long time ago...nt SidDithers Feb 2015 #49
If I ran for office, I would take money from anyone. Ykcutnek Feb 2015 #45
So, there are tons of Anti-science GMO's are bad for you people who will donate to her as well. dilby Feb 2015 #10
"Please don't politicize public health" unless whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #11
paul and christie are stating their vaccine beliefs and politicizing themselves nt msongs Feb 2015 #14
So donor positions and affiliations are no longer probative? whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #16
No, nut-picking amongst donors is not probative. Maybe if you could show geek tragedy Feb 2015 #23
Paul and Christie politicized it by pandering to anti-vaxxers and making tremendously geek tragedy Feb 2015 #17
I see... whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #19
So you're whining that DUers are criticizing Republicans for saying false and crazy and geek tragedy Feb 2015 #22
No whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #24
Okay. She took some money from two people who hold one position that is incorrect, with geek tragedy Feb 2015 #25
Not a scandal whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #27
It's fine to air it, but it's not nearly as consequential, or meaningful. geek tragedy Feb 2015 #28
You are welcome to your opinion n/t whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #30
and you are welcome to hate on Hillary for whatever trivial reasons you want to. geek tragedy Feb 2015 #31
Yeah... And Attacking Political Donors, Is A "Cheap Shot"... WillyT Feb 2015 #51
Hillary Clinton: The earth is round and vaccines work Agnosticsherbet Feb 2015 #13
HRC's glib tweet in support is NOT a legal mandate. Divernan Feb 2015 #43
So you think Hillary wasn't detailed enough in her defense of vaccinations Cali_Democrat Feb 2015 #46
She offered NO specific position on the issue-leaving typical Clinton wiggle room. Divernan Feb 2015 #50
Her support of vaccination is all that is necessary at the moment. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2015 #48
I wouldn't assume you couldn't find a Warren or Sanders supporters among the anti-vaxxers brooklynite Feb 2015 #15
The anti-vaxxers know no particular party or candidate. HappyMe Feb 2015 #42
Though I've no idea yet who I'll vote for in the primaries, posts such as this do tend to illustrate LanternWaste Feb 2015 #20
Politicizing public health issues reminds me of Ronald Reagan and the Republicans of his era Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #26
So, what does Hillary Clinton have to say about the vaccination issue? MineralMan Feb 2015 #39
Attacking politicians for taking donations from anyone has always been a cheap shot. Ykcutnek Feb 2015 #44
Meh. AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»These Anti-Vaxxers Are Fu...»Reply #10