Should those who have chosen to not vaccinate their kids be legally liable for infecting other

[Bluenorthwest]

52. No, I don't. If you can prove the transmission in either case, it's just the same.

I personally oppose such laws and suits, but my point, is that those who are objecting now had years to object to the other and did not. It's a double standard. Asking 'should we do this' as if we don't already do that. It's already been done.
My point is that those affecting that this is a new question are incorrect, it is an old question.

It sounds like a good idea, but it is a very bad idea. It is also an idea that has been up and running for many, many years as a bad idea and in recent times efforts to end such bad laws are taking hold.
It's just a bit offensive that straight America seems to forget the entire history of HIV and the things that straight America did to others around it. All that suffering and all of the wrongs committed should have taught some lessons, but instead, not.