Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: UPS says it has a copyright on the color brown. [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)34. Same brown with the same yellow logo is very different from just brown.
And protecting the poor consumer is not usually as much of an issue for the company as protecting itself. But, I am going to stand on tiptoeing out of discussing the larger issues.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am not 100% convinced that trademarks should be granted in colors, even for limited
merrily
Feb 2015
#15
Actually, my OP is pure tongue in cheek, which most people seem to have figured out...
dixiegrrrrl
Feb 2015
#23
That's clearly what the founders intended when they wrote Art 1, Sect 8: "To promote the Progress...
Faryn Balyncd
Feb 2015
#4
Trademarks did not arise under the commerce clause. They existed long, long before the
merrily
Feb 2015
#36
It's a trademark, not copyright. So if you start another delivery company don't use Brown.
PoliticAverse
Feb 2015
#5
Two things: 1. You can only trademark colors for specific objects/applications.
DetlefK
Feb 2015
#53