Why is there no discussion of the link between vaccinations and loss of female pubic hair?

[Demeter]

11. On Thu Feb 5, 2015, 04:20 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Hasn't there been enough insults and mocking? We have to have yet Another thread on this crap, only this time to talk about female pubic hair? It's tasteless. Enough already. Start a new forum.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Feb 5, 2015, 04:28 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter should just ignore if offended. Nothing wrong with this post in my view.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Seriously, all of you pearl-clutchers need to knock it off. You make DU suck. Alot. This is not the first time some hot chick in a partial state of undress will be on the front cover of this particular magazine. Remember the three wonderful asses they showed last year? Holy shit you could have had a DU Olympics right here with the number of people flying off the handle, jumping to conclusions, and falling to the ground with their indignant outrage.*NEWSFLASH* SI does this EVERY YEAR FOR PRECISELY THIS REACTION. Knock it off.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Anti-vaxxers deserve this much mocking and more. Their "theories" belong in creative speculation or conspiracy nutball websites.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This is disgusting. Might as well claim that before vaccinations, there were intelligent men. Come to think of it....

I'M ASSUMING PEARL-CLUTCHERS IS A UNIQUELY FEMININE-DIRECTED INSULT...