Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
92. As a matter of raw political science, they're not.
Thu Feb 5, 2015, 06:20 PM
Feb 2015

One is an ideology; the other is a direct statement on a pending political act.

Each requires a different political response, which rarely involves posturing on the internet.

And I'll keep calling simple-minded bigotry when I see it posted.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But, but, but he's our new wonderful liberal pope. HERVEPA Feb 2015 #1
This! n/t marym625 Feb 2015 #3
That was always just BS. Here's the new pope, same as the old pope, just djean111 Feb 2015 #47
Are you Catholic? sundevil2000 Feb 2015 #54
That makes no difference to anything. A completely irrelevant question. closeupready Feb 2015 #56
Then why did that person post that he was their new wonderful liberal pope? sundevil2000 Feb 2015 #61
Not surprised marym625 Feb 2015 #2
His many defenders and promoters on DU will never comment on this Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #4
They have no fucking convictions at all. William769 Feb 2015 #12
But later they will post photos of him hand feeding a panda bear and they'll all swoon and delcare Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #16
With a few prominent skepticscott Feb 2015 #114
I never judged the pope, but had hopes for him. Lucky Luciano Feb 2015 #38
Pope Francis represents a small step to the left, returning to the position of John Paul II, after AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #42
But in reality, Ratzinger wrote entire books about globalization and income inequality and actually Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #51
That's a good point, but Ratzinger failed *hard* on the PR aspect of it. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #53
Yup. Nor will the thousands of the laity who, conversely, demand that muslims loudly denounce closeupready Feb 2015 #57
And there it is. The Pope is Catholic. MineralMan Feb 2015 #5
What say you now, Pope Slobberers? Arugula Latte Feb 2015 #6
Of course he did. PeaceNikki Feb 2015 #7
Still want him to speak to our Congress? If that occurs, what position does the Jefferson23 Feb 2015 #8
His 'help' is not welcome nor wanted in any capacity. Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #11
The Democrats in power want him there, so it is a problem.They're already Jefferson23 Feb 2015 #15
Says who? Boehner invited him. You straight folks need to start paying your own damn price Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #19
Pelosi objected? It is you who needs to learn what is going on and who is using who. Jefferson23 Feb 2015 #20
You said 'the Democrats in power want him there' Pelosi is one person. Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #21
Oh yea, she has no power and where are all the other Demorats who have voiced Jefferson23 Feb 2015 #23
You were asking what price we were willing to pay for his help on income inequality. Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #25
Collectively, in all my posts, I don't feel I am the one who did not speak clearly. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2015 #27
Tell him to take a long walk off a short pier. William769 Feb 2015 #14
They won't do that, and it gets too cozy for him to speak there, I think. Jefferson23 Feb 2015 #17
President Obama's SOTU was pretty clear. William769 Feb 2015 #22
He should not speak before Congress, it is asking for trouble. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2015 #24
Glad to see you spell that out. Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #26
But, but, but, this can't be true! EvolveOrConvolve Feb 2015 #9
Well, bvf Feb 2015 #31
That's very Jesus like of him. William769 Feb 2015 #10
Oh, but he's so charming or something! REP Feb 2015 #13
Spreading love and the bonding of people as usual, NOT!!! This pope's hatefulness turns my stomach. RKP5637 Feb 2015 #18
As a heretic Catholic, in a heretic family... hunter Feb 2015 #28
Naturally. n/t. bvf Feb 2015 #29
Is that what Jesus would do, Francis? nt SunSeeker Feb 2015 #30
so pope photo op is at it again. niyad Feb 2015 #32
Remember that time buzzfeed reported the Pope said cats and dogs could go to Heaven? krawhitham Feb 2015 #33
That was a satire site, that got taken seriously. This material is from the Catholic News Service AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #40
Ugh... sakabatou Feb 2015 #34
The bestest most liberal Pope Evaaa!!!!!! obxhead Feb 2015 #35
He has no more authority to speak on civil law in Slovakia than he does in Indiana. rug Feb 2015 #36
What a pathetic deflection. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #39
Happily, this poster is a lone voice here skepticscott Feb 2015 #45
I was wondering who would show up to defend the faith. Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #49
I know there are still knee-jerk defenders skepticscott Feb 2015 #50
Get off your high horse. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2015 #58
Oh please...he's not even making a teensy diversion from bigotry skepticscott Feb 2015 #59
You're outing yourself, scottie. rug Feb 2015 #66
The issue at hand is more than sufficient. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #79
Ah. he tagged the peanut gallery instead. rug Feb 2015 #81
Nobody 'tagged' anything. If you want your exchanges private, use PM's. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #83
When I want to discuss something with you, AC, you will know it. rug Feb 2015 #85
That's what I thought. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #89
FYI - This post was sent to jury. TM99 Feb 2015 #110
Of course it was. Thanks for posting the results. rug Feb 2015 #118
The pope has no intent to turn on this issue at all. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #76
You've always had a probelm with facts, nuance and context Warren. rug Feb 2015 #65
And he didn't disappoint skepticscott Feb 2015 #69
The passive-agressive indirect ad homs you post are still ad homs. rug Feb 2015 #88
You still don't disappoint skepticscott Feb 2015 #95
The only disappoint I see here is your failure to back up your accusation. rug Feb 2015 #98
I accused you skepticscott Feb 2015 #105
That is a predictably weaselly answer from you. rug Feb 2015 #107
Did you drop your alleged ignore list to post this? rug Feb 2015 #64
Let's see if you have the integrity skepticscott Feb 2015 #71
Good, let's use clear words instead of weaseling. rug Feb 2015 #86
You were challenged to quote me directly skepticscott Feb 2015 #111
Oh? You were not accusing me of defending homophobic bigotry? rug Feb 2015 #117
You are actively engaged in this thread, deflecting for a man who is engaged in homophobic bigotry. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #82
Shoo, someone else has my attention. rug Feb 2015 #87
I know reading timestamps can be tricky, but I engaged you in this thread before he showed up. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #91
Good, keep reading timestamps. rug Feb 2015 #96
No weasels in post 82. Let's see you actually respond to it, eh? AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #99
Order takeout. rug Feb 2015 #100
Yeah, that's what I thought. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #102
This poster needs to look in the mirror skepticscott Feb 2015 #112
Ah, you're back to the passive-aggressive indirect ad homs. rug Feb 2015 #120
jury duty brought me here ... was there a glitch or is this longest jury result ever? *update* Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2015 #70
alerted at 1:44pm Results at 4:45pm ... gotta be a contender for the title. right? Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2015 #72
I would assume that to be a time-zone differential in the text of the timestamp, but AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #94
why would my time stamp vary? but, Yes Juror #1 went over, above and beyond the call of duty. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2015 #104
Well, the site software might do something silly like record the client timestamp of submission AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #108
Must have been a glitch skepticscott Feb 2015 #77
Those four you already have must have been glitches. rug Feb 2015 #90
How many "glitches" do you have? truebrit71 Feb 2015 #119
Take a look. Why, it's simply one more than you! rug Feb 2015 #121
One more? truebrit71 Feb 2015 #122
The night is young, brit. rug Feb 2015 #123
This isn't your usual playground rug... truebrit71 Feb 2015 #124
I don't do playgrounds, brit. rug Feb 2015 #125
Nope, i prefer adult conversation, with fellow grown-ups.... truebrit71 Feb 2015 #126
Oh, I can see that. rug Feb 2015 #127
So, tell us what smileys mean then. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #130
Tell me who "us" is. rug Feb 2015 #133
On this thread, everyone but you apparently. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #135
No one but you has asked, apparently. rug Feb 2015 #141
Why so coy? AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #144
Are you still subbing for scottie? rug Feb 2015 #147
Deflection ++ AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #153
Refraction. rug Feb 2015 #155
rug never answers a direct question.... truebrit71 Feb 2015 #151
Present company excepted of course.. truebrit71 Feb 2015 #134
The only pathos here is your inveterate hatred of anything concerning any Pope. rug Feb 2015 #62
In this case, they are one and the same. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #73
As a matter of raw political science, they're not. rug Feb 2015 #92
The pope approaches both elements from the same position. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #97
The OP is about a specific event. rug Feb 2015 #103
A specific event for which the pope, and the curch separately have recent and enduring history on. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #109
are you chiding the poster for "hating" (your word, not his) the Pope? CreekDog Feb 2015 #74
Interesting how "anti-Catholic bullshit" really gets your goat, yet anti-gay and Arugula Latte Feb 2015 #148
Interesting how you place your thoughts in my head. rug Feb 2015 #154
So... when he says something "nice and compassionate" he's a strong voice with power and influence PeaceNikki Feb 2015 #55
Where has he said that and who has said that about what you say he said? rug Feb 2015 #67
by supporting the referendum and actions of the church in Slovakia which would deny their rights CreekDog Feb 2015 #78
Read the post I was replying too. rug Feb 2015 #84
I find that statement incredibly naive. Zenlitened Feb 2015 #101
I find the headline you posted to be incredible flamebait. rug Feb 2015 #106
"Flamebait"? Is that how we now refer... Zenlitened Feb 2015 #113
No, that's how "we" refer to inaccurate headlines and incomplete news articles. rug Feb 2015 #116
Is it possible you don't actually know... Zenlitened Feb 2015 #128
All sorts of dogs react to all sorts of whistles, as is evident here. rug Feb 2015 #129
28 posts in this thread. The first, a disingenuous deflection. The rest, just quibbling with meta. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #131
I forgot that providing context antagonizes you. rug Feb 2015 #132
Oh please. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #138
You must consider anything that does not align with wherever your thoughts are to be a deflection. rug Feb 2015 #139
No, THIS is a deflection. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #143
"semi-captive audience"? rug Feb 2015 #146
Yes, semi-captive. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #152
Results... Major Nikon Feb 2015 #149
Thanks for posting the results. rug Feb 2015 #150
it's an accurate headline CreekDog Feb 2015 #136
You're a poor psychoanalyst CreekDog. rug Feb 2015 #137
You read them all? CreekDog Feb 2015 #140
Now that you mention it, no. There may be one or two where you exhibited shame. rug Feb 2015 #142
But but but he had a press release about... BrotherIvan Feb 2015 #37
this Pope isn't really any different from other Popes and Catholic Leaders, they have almost always JI7 Feb 2015 #41
Francis is hatemongering again. As predictable as the sunrise. nt Zorra Feb 2015 #43
Seems like Francis is the one with the Hate....... Marrah_G Feb 2015 #52
Who is surprised by this? Behind the Aegis Feb 2015 #44
Certainly no one who has been paying attention this whole time... trotsky Feb 2015 #48
... SidDithers Feb 2015 #46
+1 Go Vols Feb 2015 #156
Weak, corrupt carpet-bagging. n/t Orsino Feb 2015 #60
Lots of carpet baggery skepticscott Feb 2015 #158
Bigotry from the catholic church? horrifying! Shocking! oh my! La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2015 #63
The pope is just a man with a funny hat. lynne Feb 2015 #68
Unfortunately, that is simply not true: Zenlitened Feb 2015 #93
What is he doing getting into politics? KamaAina Feb 2015 #75
That stinks and is highly disappointing. I want to be able to get married in every state and country hrmjustin Feb 2015 #80
Separation of Church and State, please. bigwillq Feb 2015 #115
Not surprising in the least riderinthestorm Feb 2015 #145
"A big billboard of Pope Francis hangs over the centre of Slovakia’s capital, urging citizens..." Zenlitened Feb 2015 #157
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pope Endorses Referendum ...»Reply #92