Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
4. On governance based on secrets:
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 02:25 PM
Feb 2015
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/511928.html

"What no one seemed to notice," said a colleague of mine, a philologist, "was the ever widening gap, after 1933, between the government and the people. Just think how very wide this gap was to begin with, here in Germany. And it became always wider. You know, it doesn’t make people close to their government to be told that this is a people’s government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense, or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing, to do with knowing one is governing.

"What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could not understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.

"This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes. And all the crises and reforms (real reforms, too) so occupied the people that they did not see the slow motion underneath, of the whole process of government growing remoter and remoter.


The bolded part sure sounds familiar...

I realize that these passages have been posted numerous times here at DU. But it's important that we learn from the mistakes of the past. Our entire government is being run behind a wall of secrecy: secret trade negotiations, secret rationales for torture, secret rules for blanket surveillance, secret prosecutions of "terrorists."

We should be careful.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"our wide range of stakeholders" WillyT Feb 2015 #1
An educated guess is because it will be the last turn of the screwing of Cleita Feb 2015 #2
Rand Paul is supporting Obamas fast track bid on this, it can't be a good thing. Autumn Feb 2015 #3
On governance based on secrets: Maedhros Feb 2015 #4
Those passages can never be posted enough. We know that because we still have people defending sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #11
They cry "Godwin's Law!!!" as a means to end the discussion. [n/t] Maedhros Feb 2015 #17
In other (more cynical) words ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #5
European Labor is represented by real labor leaders in the talks Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #13
I do not disagree ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #20
Because sunshine is the best disinfectant. NCTraveler Feb 2015 #6
Because 'If the people knew what was in it, they would opposed be to it'. That was stated by sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #7
^^^^^^^Here's the answer^^^^^^^ woo me with science Feb 2015 #9
...nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2015 #8
your president values secrecy more than transparency nt msongs Feb 2015 #10
US battle over corporate hijacking of science matters in Europe Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #12
JF this thing comes up for a vote and we still do not have the details I hope that the majority of jwirr Feb 2015 #14
It will pass under a Republican Congress obxhead Feb 2015 #19
Kicked Enthusiast Feb 2015 #15
Fast Track Octafish Feb 2015 #16
It's bad. It's really, really bad. And it's gonna be shoved down our throats by a "Democratic" blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #18
Pig in a poke governance. JEB Feb 2015 #21
Only Nixon could go to China. Only Bill Clinton could sign NAFTA. Only Obama can... nt Romulox Feb 2015 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Trans-Pacific Partner...»Reply #4