Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
20. I do not disagree ...
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 04:33 PM
Feb 2015

But the EU's demand for transparency/questioning the lack of transparency in TPP, is unrelated to labor, or consumers, or anything other than their own trade negotiations.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"our wide range of stakeholders" WillyT Feb 2015 #1
An educated guess is because it will be the last turn of the screwing of Cleita Feb 2015 #2
Rand Paul is supporting Obamas fast track bid on this, it can't be a good thing. Autumn Feb 2015 #3
On governance based on secrets: Maedhros Feb 2015 #4
Those passages can never be posted enough. We know that because we still have people defending sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #11
They cry "Godwin's Law!!!" as a means to end the discussion. [n/t] Maedhros Feb 2015 #17
In other (more cynical) words ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #5
European Labor is represented by real labor leaders in the talks Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #13
I do not disagree ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #20
Because sunshine is the best disinfectant. NCTraveler Feb 2015 #6
Because 'If the people knew what was in it, they would opposed be to it'. That was stated by sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #7
^^^^^^^Here's the answer^^^^^^^ woo me with science Feb 2015 #9
...nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2015 #8
your president values secrecy more than transparency nt msongs Feb 2015 #10
US battle over corporate hijacking of science matters in Europe Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #12
JF this thing comes up for a vote and we still do not have the details I hope that the majority of jwirr Feb 2015 #14
It will pass under a Republican Congress obxhead Feb 2015 #19
Kicked Enthusiast Feb 2015 #15
Fast Track Octafish Feb 2015 #16
It's bad. It's really, really bad. And it's gonna be shoved down our throats by a "Democratic" blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #18
Pig in a poke governance. JEB Feb 2015 #21
Only Nixon could go to China. Only Bill Clinton could sign NAFTA. Only Obama can... nt Romulox Feb 2015 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Trans-Pacific Partner...»Reply #20