Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 03:02 AM Feb 2015

Saudis Probably Funded 9/11 Hijackers, and the U.S. Won't Do Anything About it. Here's Why. [View all]

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/28455-focus-saudis-probably-funded-911-hijackers-and-the-us-wont-do-anything-about-it-heres-why-rsn

During the process of what Perkins called the “Saudi Arabian Money-Laundering Affair (SAMA),” the U.S. Treasury sent Perkins and his team of economists at the consulting firm Chas T. Main to Saudi Arabia. Perkins described his role in a 2004 interview with Democracy Now:

“We worked out this deal whereby the Royal House of Saud agreed to send most of their petro-dollars back to the United States and invest them in U.S. government securities. The Treasury Department would use the interest from these securities to hire U.S. companies to build Saudi Arabia — new cities, new infrastructure — which we've done. And the House of Saud would agree to maintain the price of oil within acceptable limits to us, which they’ve done all of these years, and we would agree to keep the House of Saud in power as long as they did this, which we’ve done …”


The U.S.’s tenuous relationship with Saudi royalty may be upended after recent allegations made by Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th 9/11 hijacker, that Saudi Arabia bankrolled Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda in the months leading up to 9/11. Lawyers for 9/11 victims are claiming that along with Moussaoui’s revelations about a Saudi embassy official discussing a plot to assassinate President Clinton while he was aboard Air Force One, new evidence will soon emerge in two forms: Declassification of the secret 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission Report that details Saudi Arabia’s involvement in the attacks, and 80,000 pages of an FBI probe into Saudi funding of 9/11 hijackers in Florida. A 2003 article in Vanity Fair speculated about the contents of the 9/11 Commission Report’s classified contents:

“According to news reports, the classified section charges that there were ties between the hijackers and two Saudis, Omar al-Bayoumi and Osama Bassnan, who had financial relationships with members of the Saudi government. Saudi officials deny that their government was in any way linked to the attacks. The Saudis have asked that the pages be declassified so they can refute them, but President Bush has refused.”


Moussaoui’s testimony is problematic for both the U.S. and Saudi governments. Ever since Richard Nixon was president, the Saudis have maintained a close relationship with every president who’s occupied the White House. They even used that access to fly out members of the Saudi royal family and the bin Laden family when the FAA grounded all commercial and private flights (including flights for both former president Bill Clinton and former vice president Al Gore). These flights were granted permission to leave, and despite the potential for the two dozen members of the bin Laden family aboard those flights to provide invaluable information about where Osama bin Laden was hiding or the depth of his network, those family members were never interviewed by the FBI.
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Get thee to the Greatest Pages... n/t JimDandy Feb 2015 #1
All true, but there's also no other less objectionable group around to run Saudi Arabia bhikkhu Feb 2015 #2
You're actually saying that the House of Saud is the LEAST objectionable delrem Feb 2015 #5
If the House of Saud sabbat hunter Feb 2015 #15
Ah, I see. You have support for the House of Saud covered. delrem Feb 2015 #17
+1. bemildred Feb 2015 #18
The house of Saud sabbat hunter Feb 2015 #19
Iran is shia, wahabbi's are sunni. grahamhgreen Feb 2015 #20
I am well aware of that sabbat hunter Feb 2015 #22
In my view, if the Sauds were overthrown, they wouldn't quite be like Iran, grahamhgreen Feb 2015 #29
There's no need to overthrow anyone. CJCRANE Feb 2015 #23
I'm not so sure Waiting For Everyman Feb 2015 #3
it sure reallocated a ton of money in a big way... to - guess where = where? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #4
The motive was to start the War on Terror. delrem Feb 2015 #6
Bingo! Scuba Feb 2015 #14
Yup grahamhgreen Feb 2015 #21
Yep. Something had to replace the Soviet boogeyman, hifiguy Feb 2015 #25
interesting post.......... useful idiots and political game theory Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #8
A most interesting reply too, I Ching, Waiting For Everyman Feb 2015 #33
Another term used in intelligence..... SHEEP DIPPED Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #35
Love your post get the red out Feb 2015 #27
There are so many shoes left to drop. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2015 #32
I hope you are right get the red out Feb 2015 #34
I live in Kansas. Gas was scarce here in 1979, too, during the gas crisis. nt tblue37 Feb 2015 #30
I was referring to the one in the winter of 1973-74. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2015 #31
So, does DU owe some apologies? Blue State Bandit Feb 2015 #7
K&R RandiFan1290 Feb 2015 #9
I agree get the red out Feb 2015 #28
bbc Hijack 'suspects' alive and well Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #10
28 ways to help get the 28 pages de-classified nationalize the fed Feb 2015 #11
Thanks mang Jesus Malverde Feb 2015 #13
Holy cow Jesus Malverde Feb 2015 #12
one little correction to your story sabbat hunter Feb 2015 #16
You might find this Vanity Fair article of interest mnhtnbb Feb 2015 #26
airspace reopened sabbat hunter Feb 2015 #36
Saudi Arabia = hifiguy Feb 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Saudis Probably Funded 9/...