Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

treestar

(82,383 posts)
16. I would think it much harder to sleep
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 02:58 PM
Feb 2015

believing Walmart is out to get you.

If you are on the board, you don't get kicked off for an opinion. You're on the board because you own stock.

Still didn't answer about just how large is a company allowed to get before it is not allowed to take part in it?

Are the Walmart employees guilty too? How high up in the organization do you have to be to be morally wrong?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Seize Walmart, tonight. Let the employees own it. NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #1
Venezuela did just that yesterday..... Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #5
THe poster says stopping rightwing terrorists who own the food chain from continuing to terrorize NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #8
So True fasttense Feb 2015 #35
see the whole picture guillaumeb Feb 2015 #52
It's alarming to think that Hillary was on Walmart's Board of Directors for SIX years. closeupready Feb 2015 #2
What was Walmart doing at that time? treestar Feb 2015 #6
Didn't Hillary know what they were doing? If you don't, then maybe a quick search on their sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #9
Of course Hillary knew what they were doing treestar Feb 2015 #10
Yes, it is morally wrong to participate in wrong doing and/or to profit from it. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #13
I would think it much harder to sleep treestar Feb 2015 #16
Of course Liberals can be on BODs tkmorris Feb 2015 #14
Who you associate with? treestar Feb 2015 #17
Jesus Christ, another I Hate Hillary thread hijack NBachers Feb 2015 #22
Hate Hillary? daleanime Feb 2015 #55
She's fighting for the nomination, ain't she? closeupready Feb 2015 #56
If she was ineffective @ liberalizing Walmart after 6 years, she'll be an impotent president. closeupready Feb 2015 #25
that's a stretch treestar Feb 2015 #46
Here's a good Mother Jones story that tosh Feb 2015 #15
Wow that was a good link Egnever Feb 2015 #41
Very troubling indeed. Enthusiast Feb 2015 #24
"recent history" being the operative word here.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #27
that was before Sam died.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #26
"Sam"?? LOL - a "good friend" of yours? closeupready Feb 2015 #28
Everyone called him Sam.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #34
Even wiki uses the name "Sam" cstanleytech Feb 2015 #45
Walmart simply wasn't as awful back then. SheilaT Feb 2015 #39
+1 Egnever Feb 2015 #42
Seizing control of democracy by hidden enslavement and hidden labor laws and election laws , or lack of. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #3
...which benefit employees facing “extreme economic hardship... GReedDiamond Feb 2015 #4
good catch! erronis Feb 2015 #49
When I worked for BofA daredtowork Feb 2015 #7
oh man, that takes the cake. "my little atm! hey honey, let me wipe up that drool!" ND-Dem Feb 2015 #20
Here's the really sneaky part about this Major Nikon Feb 2015 #11
..."employees to fund a PAC that works directly against their own interests." RiverLover Feb 2015 #36
The employee cannot deduct a PAC contribution, cloudbase Feb 2015 #47
good catch handmade34 Feb 2015 #48
I would believe ANYTHING that Walmart is doing... Atman Feb 2015 #12
How do they sleep at night? marble falls Feb 2015 #18
I guess if they just paid them a fair wage and gave fair benefits, they'd have to pay more valerief Feb 2015 #19
Only makes sense packman Feb 2015 #21
Isn't this illegal? Brigid Feb 2015 #23
it has to be on the edge if it isn't illegal rurallib Feb 2015 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Feb 2015 #32
I'm sure the SCOTUS will rule that it should be completely legal. madinmaryland Feb 2015 #44
Republicans are NOT pro business nakocal Feb 2015 #30
Well said Egnever Feb 2015 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Feb 2015 #31
Reaganomics in action guillaumeb Feb 2015 #53
Geez. If this is not an apt parallel to chickens voting for Col. Sanders, what is? alp227 Feb 2015 #33
What is WRONG with these people? louis-t Feb 2015 #37
The 2 to 1 match sounds a little extortion-y Rose Siding Feb 2015 #38
Yes, plus clearly tax evasion, money laundering-y stuffmatters Feb 2015 #57
“extreme economic hardship due to situations outside of their control, including natural disasters.” BlueJazz Feb 2015 #40
This should not be allowed at any corporation. n/t Yo_Mama Feb 2015 #50
They treat employees like shite but give money to those like Boner.. who will take away their SNAP Cha Feb 2015 #51
Actually I find it very believable mackerel Feb 2015 #54
From bad to worse. blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #58
If you start out saying "you won't believe what Walmart is doing" Gary 50 Feb 2015 #59
Jesus Christ on a cheese sandwich! marym625 Feb 2015 #60
I believe anything that walmart does madokie Feb 2015 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You Will Not Believe What...»Reply #16