Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You Will Not Believe What Wal-Mart is Doing [View all]treestar
(82,383 posts)16. I would think it much harder to sleep
believing Walmart is out to get you.
If you are on the board, you don't get kicked off for an opinion. You're on the board because you own stock.
Still didn't answer about just how large is a company allowed to get before it is not allowed to take part in it?
Are the Walmart employees guilty too? How high up in the organization do you have to be to be morally wrong?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
THe poster says stopping rightwing terrorists who own the food chain from continuing to terrorize
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#8
It's alarming to think that Hillary was on Walmart's Board of Directors for SIX years.
closeupready
Feb 2015
#2
Didn't Hillary know what they were doing? If you don't, then maybe a quick search on their
sabrina 1
Feb 2015
#9
Yes, it is morally wrong to participate in wrong doing and/or to profit from it.
sabrina 1
Feb 2015
#13
If she was ineffective @ liberalizing Walmart after 6 years, she'll be an impotent president.
closeupready
Feb 2015
#25
Seizing control of democracy by hidden enslavement and hidden labor laws and election laws , or lack of.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#3
oh man, that takes the cake. "my little atm! hey honey, let me wipe up that drool!"
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#20
..."employees to fund a PAC that works directly against their own interests."
RiverLover
Feb 2015
#36
I guess if they just paid them a fair wage and gave fair benefits, they'd have to pay more
valerief
Feb 2015
#19
Geez. If this is not an apt parallel to chickens voting for Col. Sanders, what is?
alp227
Feb 2015
#33
“extreme economic hardship due to situations outside of their control, including natural disasters.”
BlueJazz
Feb 2015
#40