Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)

2. This is a different legal argument, they wont declare it unconstitutional but they

Reply to Drale (Reply #1)

Sat Feb 7, 2015, 08:15 PM

Feb 2015

will take one sentence, entirely out of context, where it clearly does not mean exactly what it says in light of the rest of the bill, to end the state exchanges therefore making the law unworkable.

Remember, the goal by the SC 5 and Republican is to make certain Obama's legacy is shit.

that is ALL they care about, who they kill to get there, they dont care

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

When SC guts ACA, in complete contradiction of all legal common sense and reality, what do the [View all] NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 OP

They already had the opportunity to declare it unconstitutional Drale Feb 2015 #1

This is a different legal argument, they wont declare it unconstitutional but they NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #2

It isn't about ending the state exchanges at all SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #5

Right, sorry...I had it backwards - long day NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #6

Now it turns out the plaintiff doesn't have standing in the case riderinthestorm Feb 2015 #3

I heard about this, it is a last ditch effort to use the truth to try and embarrass the SC 5 NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #4

Has this any precedent? That a case gets all the way to SCOTUS riderinthestorm Feb 2015 #7

It will not work. former9thward Feb 2015 #14

There are four plaintiffs in the case. former9thward Feb 2015 #13

They won't end it. woo me with science Feb 2015 #8

If the SC guts the ACA, we go for Single Payer. Yavin4 Feb 2015 #9

But you are talking common sense, here is the problem with common sense. NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #10

This is the line in the sand. Death or Single Payer. Yavin4 Feb 2015 #11

Yep, and what you will watch are republican voters dying from lack of healthcare who NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #12

I wouldn't presume the outcome on this one. n/t Yo_Mama Feb 2015 #15