Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)

35. I finally figured out the ONLY thing they want to conserve....

Reply to gadjitfreek (Reply #28)

Sun Feb 8, 2015, 12:11 PM

Feb 2015

Civil War battlefields.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No more National Parks? [View all] Tanuki Feb 2015 OP

Thank you for posting this Tanuki!! RiverLover Feb 2015 #1

Even George Bush recognized the importance of this! Tanuki Feb 2015 #2

All 3 County Commissioners AND the US Rep want it all locally owned and controlled duhneece Feb 2015 #23

The repubs must be listening to the devil on their shoulders.... snappyturtle Feb 2015 #3

Which one? BeanMusical Feb 2015 #21

True! nt snappyturtle Feb 2015 #22

And in other, unmentioned locations, as well NBachers Feb 2015 #26

It must itch as hell! BeanMusical Feb 2015 #36

Wonder if they have set a date for the land auction yet? jwirr Feb 2015 #4

Since 1980 per the Koch Libertarian platform. The wealthy need more land, wilderness is the best. freshwest Feb 2015 #17

I think we may luck out here in MN - most of our forest lands are STATE forests. However I don't jwirr Feb 2015 #24

State or federal, no matter. They want it. NOW. The last frontier for them to build a fiefdom. freshwest Feb 2015 #37

K&R handmade34 Feb 2015 #5

This same bill was submitted in 2013 as well. Dr Hobbitstein Feb 2015 #6

Why, because people were made aware that the bill was submitted SalviaBlue Feb 2015 #7

No, I believe it's because no one supported it. Dr Hobbitstein Feb 2015 #10

"No one supported it"? Actually, a similar bill passed 221-201 in the House last year Tanuki Feb 2015 #12

Good thing the president can veto GummyBearz Feb 2015 #16

You are not suggesting that if the media doesn't report on it then it is a fringe issue are you? SalviaBlue Feb 2015 #18

Important point. n/t cui bono Feb 2015 #20

No. Dr Hobbitstein Feb 2015 #32

K&R... thanks for making us aware of this! SalviaBlue Feb 2015 #8

Doesn't the president still have the option to veto? ybbor Feb 2015 #9

Yes but the right has an excellent reason to waste time writing this trash Rose Siding Feb 2015 #30

Eventually we will have a Republican president who won't want to veto this. Tanuki Feb 2015 #33

TR is going to rise out of his grave . . . Brigid Feb 2015 #11

Leave it to dumbass Don. raven mad Feb 2015 #13

K&R (OT - cool user name ! :^) ) eppur_se_muova Feb 2015 #14

What the heck is a tanuki? 8 things you didn't know about raccoon dogs yuiyoshida Feb 2015 #15

K and R etherealtruth Feb 2015 #19

There were people who seriously wanted to dam the Grand Canyon to make it a lake.... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2015 #25

Yeah well Teddy Roosevelt rjsquirrel Feb 2015 #29

As soon as they got those rights some uranium mining company tried to kick them off their land. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2015 #34

14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #27

Isn't it ironic gadjitfreek Feb 2015 #28

Yes! RiverLover Feb 2015 #31

I finally figured out the ONLY thing they want to conserve.... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2015 #35