Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why do rightwing billionaires spend hundreds of millions on elections if both parties are the same? [View all]NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)26. Good, thanks.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why do rightwing billionaires spend hundreds of millions on elections if both parties are the same? [View all]
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
OP
But there is a reason they want the republican in office and not the democrat, right?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#2
No, because it's PROFITABLE and sustains the illusion of democracy.
woo me with science
Feb 2015
#57
Both parties are NOT the same, so the premise of your post is flawed (perhaps
KingCharlemagne
Feb 2015
#3
Really, so they are the same on choice? voting rights? workers rights? taxation?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#18
Is it a pet project if my sister is killed in a back alley abortion, to you?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#21
They both bow down to money because that's the only way they can get elected, or
napi21
Feb 2015
#55
At least you can admit it...why do you post on a board dedicated to the Democratic Party?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#48
I don't think you will ever find a post of mine saying I won't vote for who ever
glasshouses
Feb 2015
#73
And Ted Cruz is saying something today on TV that I am sure you are in complete agreement with
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#31
The party lost me with TPP , they talk a good game but in the end they will fall in line
glasshouses
Feb 2015
#39
Got it, you say no, if women die, then so be it, if minorities are stopped from voting, so be it
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#91
So you believe Hillary may appoint a SC justice who will go against Roe?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#104
YOu just accused me of tearing apart the dem party or this board, it was an absurd thing to say
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#121
Oh, and insult MY ASS, show me the long list of minorities who dont see a difference in the parties
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#119
Dont you wonder why there are so few people who have to fight for their rights, minorities
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#123
The German Communist Party in the early 1930s made the fatal mistake of welcoming
KingCharlemagne
Feb 2015
#32
Exactly, but according to MANY here at DU, both parties are the same, weird
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#34
While I mostly agree with you....my gut is telling me things will have to get worse before...
yourout
Feb 2015
#151
Agreed, but the Dems still honor the principles of pluralism and to some extent
KingCharlemagne
Feb 2015
#130
Absolute bull for corporate Dems. Perhaps the most vicious lie of Third Way politicians,
woo me with science
Feb 2015
#144
Which leftwing billionaires are spending hundreds of millions, and do you think their AGENDA
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#11
Does one care about women having a right to their body and another doesnt?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#12
You were asking why billionaires spend money on one party more than the other
davidn3600
Feb 2015
#40
DOes one party want to DRASTICALLY reduce taxes paid by the rich and corps and one doesnt?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#13
Does one want to systematically take away voting rights and workers rights and one doesnt?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#14
Because the GOP is more bold and open in their contempt of the working class
Populist_Prole
Feb 2015
#17
Even the most liberal, radical Americans, especially those with life experiences going back to the
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#19
Yeah, sorry...I am having a hard time believing people who allege to be liberals are
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#29
FIrst I am unaware the Koch's funded the DLC, second, they are not funding the democratic candidate
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#23
Yes Koch money helped set them up. And Al Gore was one of the first chairs...
HereSince1628
Feb 2015
#36
BullSHIT, you are willing to act in a way that will kill women in back alleys
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#52
You don't want to talk about right-wing billionaires' political spending anymore, I see.
Marr
Feb 2015
#53
Sure I do, show me where the Koch's are supporting the democratic party, today, please.
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#56
NO. I'm providing what YOU ASKED FOR EVIDENCE KOCHS SUPPORTED THE DLC!!!!!
HereSince1628
Feb 2015
#51
Yes, I see now you are one of the FEW posters here who isnt defending Ted Cruz and attacking the
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#54
Wow, you ask for evidence...it's given and all you have is ad hominem attacks
HereSince1628
Feb 2015
#58
NO, I was admitting that all you did was provide me the evidence and you didnt attack outside of
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#61
I hold out hope for the Democratic Party and intend to help in the fight for its 'soul.'
LongTomH
Feb 2015
#25
Wall Street does that, and Wall Street is very rightwing, but the Koch and Walton's of the world
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#30
So women's health are equally in danger no matter which party is in power?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#41
Show me where I ever said anything within a million miles of this, or assure me you didnt
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#136
Not the Koch Bros, do you think they will spend equally on getting dems in power as cons?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#65
This question in the OP is always the weak attempt at a "trump card"
woo me with science
Feb 2015
#63
Link to the original OP that attempted this Third Way talking point AND others:
woo me with science
Feb 2015
#76
Because the Birchers/Fascists have taken full control of the gop. The Progressive side of the
Dont call me Shirley
Feb 2015
#64
But look at all the folks here who are certain there is NO difference between the two
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#66
Cite the post that says there's NO difference between the two parties, please. /nt
Marr
Feb 2015
#71
And it is terrible and it is wrong...but there is a difference between the parties
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#70
Both wanna take away women's rights to their own bodies and strip voting rights?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#82
OK, I wont ask you if you will vote in such a way to stop women from being killed
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#96
What? You lost me..I asked a simple question, dont answer it if you dont want but dont answer it
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#143
they spend the money on both sides. it's good to maintain the illusion of difference, however.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#97
Now that's something I've heard said often that I've never been able to find authoritative evidence
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#132
NO, they will NOT both spend on the Dem prez cand and the repub...unless you have something that
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#127
another du person just now said this, said it WAY better than i could
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#128
I think the argument made that both parties are the same is made most often by single issue
Agnosticsherbet
Feb 2015
#134
ACA was both a give away to health ins co and a HUGE improvement on the old system
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#139
Nonsensical and illogical. You began by calling it corporate talking points. You call them the same.
Agnosticsherbet
Feb 2015
#152
That is how much they hate us, how much they want to destroy the environment
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#138
The ones who spend on both sides want to make sure they own whichever party wins.
Jamastiene
Feb 2015
#146
That is what I said, over and over, but you would have thought I was the anti christ
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#163