Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
29. About when he questioned administration claims about who shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 07:35 PM
Feb 2015
Contrary to the Obama administration’s public claims blaming eastern Ukrainian rebels and Russia for the shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, some U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded that the rebels and Russia were likely not at fault and that it appears Ukrainian government forces were to blame, according to a source briefed on these findings.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2014/08/03/flight-17-shoot-down-scenario-shifts/


So, IMFE, August 2014.

Kind of threw a monkey wrench into the whole casus belli in the Caucasus thing.
"Liar and CT" - question assumes facts not in evidence. leveymg Feb 2015 #1
A thread was hidden by jury which is what I assumed prompted the OP Purveyor Feb 2015 #2
Then, I must apologize to Karmadillo, as should the HUAC committee that censored leveymg Feb 2015 #3
Soon, we'll all be talking like Manny. bananas Feb 2015 #5
I missed that thread. Thanks for posting it. eom Purveyor Feb 2015 #23
anything critical of Obama, his admin or his state dept must "go" if possible. m-lekktor Feb 2015 #7
And you never responded to my post where I posted the racist shit from them. msanthrope Feb 2015 #17
does a juror on that hide have the guts to post the results here? grasswire Feb 2015 #31
when journalism was outlawed. reddread Feb 2015 #4
. . . only humor disquised as sarcasm holds the truth. leveymg Feb 2015 #8
This is unreal, Karmadillo Oilwellian Feb 2015 #6
Karmadillo - Please PM me the Parry post, and I'll repost it. leveymg Feb 2015 #10
Thank you, leveymg n/t Oilwellian Feb 2015 #16
Parry actually makes some good points, as in the following excerpt from the censored article: leveymg Feb 2015 #18
I've been reading Parry's work since Iran/Contra Oilwellian Feb 2015 #30
Many thanks. Karmadillo Feb 2015 #19
often jury decisions come down to WHO committed the "offense," not what the "offense" is... wyldwolf Feb 2015 #12
Because he went off the damn deep end last year...... msanthrope Feb 2015 #9
At least he put a ?-mark in there. Wish there was more benefit of the doubt by his detractors here leveymg Feb 2015 #14
I wouldn't have censored it either....and we don't know what the alerter msanthrope Feb 2015 #15
I think we should all agree not to vote to hide opinion we disgree with, just because we disagree leveymg Feb 2015 #20
You can alert on the alerts, fyi. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #22
How is that done? leveymg Feb 2015 #26
When you have a post hidden, there's an alert button on the bottom of the PM. msanthrope Feb 2015 #27
did he fail to genuflect at the alter of obama? KG Feb 2015 #11
I'd had a lot of respect for him. I own a couple of his books. He'd even Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2015 #13
His downfall was when he acquired the ability to read minds back around 2008. PSPS Feb 2015 #21
IMO, his sources are no longer credible. It's that simple and not uncommon. KittyWampus Feb 2015 #24
What? You got a thread pulled for posting an article by Robert Parry? pa28 Feb 2015 #25
He's lost my respect for many reasons, not the least of which was his regular promotion of Crimea Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #28
About when he questioned administration claims about who shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17. Octafish Feb 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When did Robert Parry bec...»Reply #29