Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"But it could have been worse!" MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #1
not for me, unfortunately. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #2
Sorry to hear that! MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #4
But the decline started way before Obama came into the picture. Try the Reagan years for starters. kelliekat44 Feb 2015 #17
THANK YOU. After the first oil shock, or thereabouts. nt raccoon Feb 2015 #28
I agree for the most part JonLP24 Feb 2015 #33
when money talks guillaumeb Feb 2015 #153
"and we're gonna make sure it does": the Third Way policy once they're in office MisterP Feb 2015 #23
Yeah, they can just eat ramen noodles! ananda Feb 2015 #46
Ahhh . . . fyi everyone, this started with Reagan and trickle down and union busting . . . brush Feb 2015 #152
True quaker bill Feb 2015 #176
Decline? Try disappearance. Warpy Feb 2015 #3
I think this is the end game; wealth is moving out of the US to other places in the world. There's ND-Dem Feb 2015 #5
With recent developments, I'd say wealth is moving from other places to the US DFW Feb 2015 #6
I saw that NYT article, more of the same but huge increase in the last 6 years, due to record appalachiablue Feb 2015 #89
You may be right. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #8
Yes, global corporations have a global plan, woo me with science Feb 2015 #11
The new Greek government is inspiring in azmom Feb 2015 #39
+1000000000 woo me with science Feb 2015 #74
Still a few bites left on the carcass; bit gamy, but enough to inspire some economic "activity" hatrack Feb 2015 #32
"no political need" guillaumeb Feb 2015 #154
They know exactly what they've done, because it was the plan. woo me with science Feb 2015 #7
You stated that so succinctly: CrispyQ Feb 2015 #57
+10000000 American exceptionalism. woo me with science Feb 2015 #75
+100 appalachiablue Feb 2015 #88
put the blame where it belongs. reagan + destruction of the unions. tinkle down. pansypoo53219 Feb 2015 #9
We're deluding ourselves if we don't acknowledge the roles played Maedhros Feb 2015 #58
You are right. 840high Feb 2015 #162
What do you think the TPP will do to the middle class? nm rhett o rick Feb 2015 #104
I thought the middle class was already dead? YoungDemCA Feb 2015 #120
That's what happens when you replaced middle class jobs with walmart obxhead Feb 2015 #10
A service economy cannot work well. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #13
+1 What a scam. woo me with science Feb 2015 #14
Who robs life of its quality? Who renders rage a necessity Maedhros Feb 2015 #59
Powerful video. woo me with science Feb 2015 #76
Also from Bruce Cockburn, and appropriate to our situation: Maedhros Feb 2015 #163
+2 RiverLover Feb 2015 #20
It's going to take a 50% unemployment rate azmom Feb 2015 #40
Obama did that? Who knew? frazzled Feb 2015 #36
There have been many hits over the years. The difference during this admin is that, at least ND-Dem Feb 2015 #38
It didn't come back during ANY administration's term frazzled Feb 2015 #41
I think you're mistaken. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #45
Not so frazzled Feb 2015 #42
Do you want to post some data on that, as I have? I'm open to being convinced. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #48
Here are a few things to start with frazzled Feb 2015 #66
Your own link says median income continued to rise, despite people at the bottom losing ND-Dem Feb 2015 #81
When did GOP allow Obama's economic and tax policies to pass and replace Bush's? blm Feb 2015 #65
And the relevance to my post is? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #86
LOL - Forgot about GOP holding unemployment checks hostage, eh? blm Feb 2015 #149
huh? maybe if you presented some reference to what you're talking about. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #151
Dems didn't. GOP intransigence that protected Bush's economic and tax policies did. blm Feb 2015 #64
The "recovery" is an illusion of propaganda. woo me with science Feb 2015 #12
That 93% number you have circled in the bottom right GummyBearz Feb 2015 #15
LOL nt RiverLover Feb 2015 #21
The recovery worked just fine. For those for whom it was designed. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2015 #56
+100 appalachiablue Feb 2015 #90
+1000000000 woo me with science Feb 2015 #143
Just watched "Inside Job" on itunes flygal Feb 2015 #16
How was Obama supposed to make any changes the GOP didn't want? Bandit Feb 2015 #30
Yes edhopper Feb 2015 #47
But what is middle class? RazzleCat Feb 2015 #18
I think one hallmark of the 'middle class' is single wager earner households. elias49 Feb 2015 #19
the OP put it in bold for you Enrique Feb 2015 #69
The idea that Obama was a protector of American jobs should have died betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #22
Kick (n/t) SMC22307 Feb 2015 #24
kick woo me with science Feb 2015 #25
I think President Obama is a very nice person. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #26
Exactly. laundry_queen Feb 2015 #27
I agree fredamae Feb 2015 #29
Middle class decline looms over 30 years of neo-liberal free trade conventional wisdom hatrack Feb 2015 #31
Let the truth be told. lonestarnot Feb 2015 #34
Bush-Cheney INTENDED to destroy middleclass and GOP congress protected their plan blm Feb 2015 #35
Exactly. That Obama was able to keep our economy from collapsing completely is a major achievement stevenleser Feb 2015 #43
Pinning the destruction of middle class on Obama's policies is utter Horseshit and blm Feb 2015 #159
I'm sure they did. Nevertheless, the article is factual. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #50
Article completely blames Obama for GOP's tactic of intransigence blm Feb 2015 #63
Indeed. GOP deliberately sabotaged recovery/etc as a political tactic emulatorloo Feb 2015 #78
It clearly doesn't do any such thing. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #85
HS - I have very clear recall of the way it all has REALLY been going down. blm Feb 2015 #158
i'm not a performer, so i'm not accustomed to an audience at all. i don't know what you're reading, ND-Dem Feb 2015 #164
So why repeatedly argue and post repug talking points if you know . . . brush Feb 2015 #165
1. I didn't 'argue' anything. 2. I didn't post any repug talking points. I posted a news article ND-Dem Feb 2015 #166
So your posts are what . . . to just blame Obama . . . brush Feb 2015 #167
Please point out the specific Obama-blaming in the articlem where it lays all the failures of the ND-Dem Feb 2015 #168
Oh please! Start with the title. nt brush Feb 2015 #169
There's no agency stated or implied in the title. "Storm looms over kansas" doesn't mean ND-Dem Feb 2015 #171
Not nearly the same. Come on, stop playing dumb. brush Feb 2015 #172
i'm not playing dumb. there's no blame in the title, explicit or implicit. nor in the article, if ND-Dem Feb 2015 #174
Oh, Hannah... SidDithers Feb 2015 #37
ROFL alcibiades_mystery Feb 2015 #44
Better Believe It MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #54
Yup. zappaman Feb 2015 #61
At least it's not the WSWS. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #67
Good catch. I was wondering where this Hekate Feb 2015 #116
Translation: Hannah Bell doesn't want you to vote FSogol Feb 2015 #49
The 2nd iteration of Hannah Bell was banned as an homophobe... SidDithers Feb 2015 #60
Wonder what Amazon's Jeff Bezos thinks about that? FSogol Feb 2015 #62
Wasn't that based on RT article posted as an OP? One found easily by using the msanthrope Feb 2015 #68
Yup. That was the one... SidDithers Feb 2015 #70
Hmmm...22 recs. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #71
Reply #72 was quite good in that thread. FSogol Feb 2015 #93
Haha, that was me! tammywammy Feb 2015 #144
I had forgotten about that. This person should not be allowed back on DU. stevenleser Feb 2015 #160
I agree...nt SidDithers Feb 2015 #161
There are almost always more than one path to achieve a goal. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2015 #51
The only reason the rich were paying more taxes is that the rest had less money. Percentage-wise, ND-Dem Feb 2015 #52
I know the economic mess started long before 2008, CrispyQ Feb 2015 #53
I agree. First order of business was bailing out the crooks who brought down the economy. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #55
Pemember, aspirant Feb 2015 #83
Hmm davidthegnome Feb 2015 #72
Thanks so much, and keep the faith! We have no babylonsister Feb 2015 #80
Hey David, nice to see you. CrispyQ Feb 2015 #87
"If it's going to be done, we have to do it." There I agree with you. And I have to say that ND-Dem Feb 2015 #97
kick woo me with science Feb 2015 #73
But Hillary!?!? Phlem Feb 2015 #77
The decline has been in motion for more than 30 years. cheapdate Feb 2015 #79
"Globalization" has been going on for centuries. It's not the reason for our current predicament, ND-Dem Feb 2015 #84
Wrong. moondust Feb 2015 #91
Jobs & raw materials have been being moved all over the planet for millenia. What do you think ND-Dem Feb 2015 #94
Not on a large scale. moondust Feb 2015 #103
on a very large scale. I think you don't know your history if you think imports weren't fueling ND-Dem Feb 2015 #105
... moondust Feb 2015 #109
I've read similar stuff. But there wasn't just *one* black death epidemic 1348-50; there were ND-Dem Feb 2015 #110
It has everything to with our current situation. cheapdate Feb 2015 #92
Massive amounts of capital have always moved across oceans, continents, and international ND-Dem Feb 2015 #96
Well, I don't think shipments of gold and silver from the New World cheapdate Feb 2015 #98
of course nothing is ever *exactly* the same and no one claimed it was. of course capital ND-Dem Feb 2015 #106
There's no comparison, Cheapdate and Moondust are correct on this. Your posts & positions appalachiablue Feb 2015 #108
It's *bubonic plague* or "black death." google "black plague" and see what you get. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #113
It believe that google uses Bu. Plague or Black Death. Eveyone knows it's the Bubonic Plague, but appalachiablue Feb 2015 #115
I got a bit confused there. I initially thought you were claiming black plague was the common ND-Dem Feb 2015 #117
It's ok, I don't think the Medieval Police or the Sforzas are watching. But the Borgias could appalachiablue Feb 2015 #127
but it wasn't the 'black plague'. it was the 'great plague'. (lol at the 'medieval police/sforza' ND-Dem Feb 2015 #129
It certainly was the Great Plague of London like the Great Fire of London, which provided appalachiablue Feb 2015 #137
This message was self-deleted by its author ND-Dem Feb 2015 #139
yes. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #140
Calling it moondust Feb 2015 #114
Not a problem, easy to do. And who the heck would think it wrong?! TC. appalachiablue Feb 2015 #121
Globalization has been going on for centuries The2ndWheel Feb 2015 #148
Foreign trade has been going on for centuries. moondust Feb 2015 #170
you don't remember when britain was the 'jobs and industry' leader before ww2? that was an even ND-Dem Feb 2015 #179
+100 appalachiablue Feb 2015 #107
Tim Geithner foamed the runway for the banksters starting in January 2009. Octafish Feb 2015 #82
My thought exactly...How did anyone think that having Geithner and Summers deutsey Feb 2015 #145
K&R! K&R! K&R! K&R! Phlem Feb 2015 #95
Let's not forget that this has been going on for 35 years n/t eridani Feb 2015 #99
what has? families in the middle of the income distribution have been earning less since 1979? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #100
Reaganomics laid the groundwork. There was a lot of flatlining before the decline n/t eridani Feb 2015 #101
did you look at the chart? specifically, at the yellow historical median family income line? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #102
If median income goes up by 13% from 1980 to now, but food and gas are double, minimum eridani Feb 2015 #111
That's all in 2012 dollars. Which takes care of your objections, more or less. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #112
No, it does not. Expenses have increased dramatically in REAL terms n/t eridani Feb 2015 #131
that's why they used 2012 dollars. those are 'real' terms; IOW, the dollars being compared ND-Dem Feb 2015 #132
You don't seem to be seeing the difference between income and expenditures eridani Feb 2015 #134
I believe I used MEDIAN income. Can you link me to what you're referring to? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #135
It's in your own graph reference. And if you really want to be honest, the eridani Feb 2015 #136
The title of the chart is: "Real Mean and Median Income, Families and Individuals, 1947-2012..." ND-Dem Feb 2015 #138
Obama is not a miracle worker YoungDemCA Feb 2015 #118
is there somewhere in the article anyone claimed obama caused anything? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #119
Obama's Presidency has been a net positive for the vast majority of Americans YoungDemCA Feb 2015 #122
is there somewhere the article claims obama caused anything? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #124
Don't be coy. YoungDemCA Feb 2015 #126
i'm not being coy. it's a serious question. the article doesn't say or imply that obama ND-Dem Feb 2015 #141
The headline sure does treestar Feb 2015 #147
No, it doesn't. The headline refers to the Obama presidency because wages & net worth are lower ND-Dem Feb 2015 #150
Ronald. Reagan. Good grief, the amnesia is incedible. Hekate Feb 2015 #123
not seeing the reagan reference. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #125
Uh huh. It's only been pointed out a dozen times already in this thread. nt Hekate Feb 2015 #128
i don;'t see that either. can you link me? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #130
Poor you just wants to pick a fight, and I don't want to play along. Read your own thread. nt Hekate Feb 2015 #133
i'm not trying to pick a fight. i don't see the reagan reference, in the article or in the thread. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #142
Racist Ronnie Reagan guillaumeb Feb 2015 #155
reagan left office 26 years ago. his presidency may have been the "beginning of the pushback", ND-Dem Feb 2015 #175
Reagan was a figurehead guillaumeb Feb 2015 #178
Ronald Reagan, his Supply Side Republicans, their Union busting, middle class gutting piracy is Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #146
And you think the middleclass would do better under Republicans Stargazer99 Feb 2015 #156
I do? I think that? Where did you get that information? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #157
I Believe In Hillary! I Believe She Can Finish The Job! Katashi_itto Feb 2015 #173
I just found out that I am being laid off. smirkymonkey Feb 2015 #177
I'm sorry to hear that. I hope you find something relatively comparable. My best wishes to ND-Dem Feb 2015 #180
Thank you so much ND-Dem! smirkymonkey Feb 2015 #181
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Middle class decline loom...»Reply #24