Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Anyone remember when Bush lied America into war on Iraq? [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)10. That was the Second Iraq War.
Who Lied to Whom?
Why did the Administration endorse a forgery about Iraqs nuclear program?
BY SEYMOUR M. HERSH
The New Yorker
Annals of National Security MARCH 31, 2003 ISSUE
Last September 24th, as Congress prepared to vote on the resolution authorizing President George W. Bush to wage war in Iraq, a group of senior intelligence officials, including George Tenet, the Director of Central Intelligence, briefed the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Iraqs weapons capability. It was an important presentation for the Bush Administration. Some Democrats were publicly questioning the Presidents claim that Iraq still possessed weapons of mass destruction which posed an immediate threat to the United States. Just the day before, former Vice-President Al Gore had sharply criticized the Administrations advocacy of preëmptive war, calling it a doctrine that would replace a world in which states consider themselves subject to law with the notion that there is no law but the discretion of the President of the United States. A few Democrats were also considering putting an alternative resolution before Congress.
According to two of those present at the briefing, which was highly classified and took place in the committees secure hearing room, Tenet declared, as he had done before, that a shipment of high-strength aluminum tubes that was intercepted on its way to Iraq had been meant for the construction of centrifuges that could be used to produce enriched uranium. The suitability of the tubes for that purpose had been disputed, but this time the argument that Iraq had a nuclear program under way was buttressed by a new and striking fact: the C.I.A. had recently received intelligence showing that, between 1999 and 2001, Iraq had attempted to buy five hundred tons of uranium oxide from Niger, one of the worlds largest producers. The uranium, known as yellow cake, can be used to make fuel for nuclear reactors; if processed differently, it can also be enriched to make weapons. Five tons can produce enough weapon-grade uranium for a bomb. (When the C.I.A. spokesman William Harlow was asked for comment, he denied that Tenet had briefed the senators on Niger.)
On the same day, in London, Tony Blairs government made public a dossier containing much of the information that the Senate committee was being given in secretthat Iraq had sought to buy significant quantities of uranium from an unnamed African country, despite having no active civil nuclear power programme that could require it. The allegation attracted immediate attention; a headline in the London Guardian declared, african gangs offer route to uranium.
SNIP...
President Bush cited the uranium deal, along with the aluminum tubes, in his State of the Union Message, on January 28th, while crediting Britain as the source of the information: The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. He commented, Saddam Hussein has not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide.
CONTINUED...
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2003/03/31/who-lied-to-whom
That war, coincidentally, was started by lies told by the OP's son.
Why did the Administration endorse a forgery about Iraqs nuclear program?
BY SEYMOUR M. HERSH
The New Yorker
Annals of National Security MARCH 31, 2003 ISSUE
Last September 24th, as Congress prepared to vote on the resolution authorizing President George W. Bush to wage war in Iraq, a group of senior intelligence officials, including George Tenet, the Director of Central Intelligence, briefed the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Iraqs weapons capability. It was an important presentation for the Bush Administration. Some Democrats were publicly questioning the Presidents claim that Iraq still possessed weapons of mass destruction which posed an immediate threat to the United States. Just the day before, former Vice-President Al Gore had sharply criticized the Administrations advocacy of preëmptive war, calling it a doctrine that would replace a world in which states consider themselves subject to law with the notion that there is no law but the discretion of the President of the United States. A few Democrats were also considering putting an alternative resolution before Congress.
According to two of those present at the briefing, which was highly classified and took place in the committees secure hearing room, Tenet declared, as he had done before, that a shipment of high-strength aluminum tubes that was intercepted on its way to Iraq had been meant for the construction of centrifuges that could be used to produce enriched uranium. The suitability of the tubes for that purpose had been disputed, but this time the argument that Iraq had a nuclear program under way was buttressed by a new and striking fact: the C.I.A. had recently received intelligence showing that, between 1999 and 2001, Iraq had attempted to buy five hundred tons of uranium oxide from Niger, one of the worlds largest producers. The uranium, known as yellow cake, can be used to make fuel for nuclear reactors; if processed differently, it can also be enriched to make weapons. Five tons can produce enough weapon-grade uranium for a bomb. (When the C.I.A. spokesman William Harlow was asked for comment, he denied that Tenet had briefed the senators on Niger.)
On the same day, in London, Tony Blairs government made public a dossier containing much of the information that the Senate committee was being given in secretthat Iraq had sought to buy significant quantities of uranium from an unnamed African country, despite having no active civil nuclear power programme that could require it. The allegation attracted immediate attention; a headline in the London Guardian declared, african gangs offer route to uranium.
SNIP...
President Bush cited the uranium deal, along with the aluminum tubes, in his State of the Union Message, on January 28th, while crediting Britain as the source of the information: The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. He commented, Saddam Hussein has not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide.
CONTINUED...
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2003/03/31/who-lied-to-whom
That war, coincidentally, was started by lies told by the OP's son.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Since it is now a proven lie, what else did he, she and so many in the chain lie about so bald facedly?
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#1
Then there were the scary "tubes" and the scary "yellow cake"... All agreed to by the mass media.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#9
Politicians lie. The sad part is that so many people believe them. Even other politicians.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2015
#4
With so many lies leading to wars, it's difficult to pick just one. But, let's give it try, anyway:
leveymg
Feb 2015
#5
FYI, Tenet refuses all requests for interviews. I've wanted to talk to him about this and his Condi
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#12
I know. He hasn't been interviewed since a "60 Minutes" piece in 2007 when he was marketing his book
leveymg
Feb 2015
#14
''All right, you've covered your ass.'' -- George W Bush to CIA briefer, August 2001.
Octafish
Feb 2015
#13