Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

William769

(59,147 posts)

13. To begin with, it has not been ratified in 37 States.

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Mon Feb 9, 2015, 09:17 PM

Feb 2015

That implies it has been voted on by the people or legislatures and that could not be further from the truth.

Many of those States, the Amendments have been ruled unconstitutional by Federal judges.

They are not throwing anybody a bone, especially me. What they will probably be saying is that a heterosexual does not have special rights over me making them a 1st class citizen & me a 2nd class citizen.

Once you resolve this, then we can talk about the rest of your OP.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Supreme Court might be planning for a split-decision in June. [View all] pnwmom Feb 2015 OP

What do you mean by "blows up the ACA"? arcane1 Feb 2015 #1

The majority of states use the Federal exchange and they're considering cases pnwmom Feb 2015 #3

Why do you think they are going to blow up the ACA? uppityperson Feb 2015 #2

Because they inexplicably decided to take the case before it had legally "ripened." pnwmom Feb 2015 #5

Unusual, but not inexplicable onenote Feb 2015 #8

It's also not inexplicable if the reason was they didn't want the Federal Court pnwmom Feb 2015 #9

Can't see where it would make a difference onenote Feb 2015 #11

I was thinking the same thing ... a split decision napkinz Feb 2015 #4

I doubt that a split decision would help the SCOTUS Gothmog Feb 2015 #6

John Roberts is fine with the ACA. Nye Bevan Feb 2015 #7

If they strike down the subsidies.... Adrahil Feb 2015 #10

All I can offer is a quote from Twain . . . Journeyman Feb 2015 #12

To begin with, it has not been ratified in 37 States. William769 Feb 2015 #13

I was using ratify in its common, non-legal meaning. You are correct pnwmom Feb 2015 #16

Thank you for the clarification. William769 Feb 2015 #18

I apologize for not being clear. pnwmom Feb 2015 #19

Agreed. William769 Feb 2015 #20

i do not trust this supreme court, not one little bit. spanone Feb 2015 #14

I'm starting to think that Roberts will end up writing the marriage equality decision. tritsofme Feb 2015 #15

Yup. He'll want the credit and the control. Same with the ACA decision, whatever it is. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #17

Well we can't win them all Reter Feb 2015 #21