Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)In their own words. An "intellectual buyout" of the Democratic Party. [View all]
There's often a lot of denial about the purposes of the forerunner to the Third Way...the DLC.
They intended to change the party into one that could get enough money without having to rely on the party's traditional constituents.
Simon Rosenberg 2001:
SNIP..."Simon Rosenberg, the former field director for the DLC who directs the New Democrat Network, a spin-off political action committee, says, "We're trying to raise money to help them lessen their reliance on traditional interest groups in the Democratic Party. In that way," he adds, "they are ideologically freed, frankly, from taking positions that make it difficult for Democrats to win."
http://prospect.org/article/how-dlc-does-it
And here's another kicker. It's hard to deny these words of the earlier members like Rob Shapiro.
Seems the "intellectual leveraged buyout" of the Democratic party has worked quite well.
The post is originally by Lloyd Grove of the Washington Post.
Al From, the Life of the Party
Senator Herman Talmadge attributed Al From's Southern twang to his hanging around so many Dixie Centrists.
But some would suggest a different explanation for From's -- pronounced "frahm's" -- strange and mysterious mode of speech, which occasionally recalls former Georgia Sen. Herman Talmadge, jaw chock-full of tobacco juice. It's all those Dixie centrists he's been consorting with during his seven years at the helm of the Democratic Leadership Council.Rob Shapiro, the DLC VP at the time, and a Clinton advisor, spoke clearly about their purpose.
What we've done in the Democratic Party," explains institute Vice President Rob Shapiro, a Clinton economic adviser, "is an intellectual leveraged buyout." The DLC, presumably, is acting as arbitrageur, selling off unprofitable mind-sets to produce a lean and efficient philosophy for the "New Democrat," as DLCers call their slick bimonthly magazine.
Unprofitable mind-sets sold off to be more efficient. We have learned through the years that a whole lot of Democratic ideals were considered "unprofitable mind-sets"...and they had to go.
I have been thinking of this comment from 1992 as we see a commission appointed by the president putting Social Security on the table and not backing down at all.
I have thought of it as I realize this group is getting their long-time goal of charter schools accomplished finally under this administration.
They are still lecturing the left, the liberals to stop complaining.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
126 replies, 17660 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (166)
ReplyReply to this post
126 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In their own words. An "intellectual buyout" of the Democratic Party. [View all]
madfloridian
Feb 2015
OP
I guess I live in cuckoo land because I believe in people first and Big Business second..
Bandit
Feb 2015
#20
"They are still lecturing the left, the liberals to stop complaining." Right here, every day.
Scuba
Feb 2015
#4
Simply check out how little coverage the low voter turnout from the last cycle.....
daleanime
Feb 2015
#116
Obama covered it Nov 2014: "Those who voted, I heard you. Those who didn't vote, I heard you, too."
merrily
Feb 2015
#117
I don't think they want ordinary voters support, actually. The rudeness and lack of regard for
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#68
Thanks, madfloridian. According to Conyers, both OASDI and Medicare were put on the table.
merrily
Feb 2015
#10
It needs a lot of time to take hold and a buttload of money up front and no one will provide that.
merrily
Feb 2015
#40
That thinking, 'unprofitable mindsets (SS, Public School Ed, etc) replaced by 'more efficient
sabrina 1
Feb 2015
#19
The issue was regional... it made it hard for democrats to win in SOME places
HereSince1628
Feb 2015
#23
Great thread. thanks. Archivists awe me some, esp. if they are not archiving for
merrily
Feb 2015
#43
Do not let down. These are historical facts about the Clintion Faction of the democractic party
Exultant Democracy
Feb 2015
#26
so cutting and pasting the same post over and over is going to make a difference?
wyldwolf
Feb 2015
#60
So the question is, do you stand up for principles, or do you sell out to be a "winner"?
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#71
Interesting that you admit you don't consider yourself progressive. Will you go the next
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#86
When have I ever NOT admitted I wasn't a 'progressive?' That isn't interesting at all.
wyldwolf
Feb 2015
#87
Maybe you will accept definitions from dictionary.com. A Progressive (noun) is "a person who is
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#103
Really? You could apply that to anyone you disagree with. Where did you get that
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#109
Howard Dean did a good job with the 50 State Strategy, but the dem leadership dropped it.
CrispyQ
Feb 2015
#101
Let's legislate exclusively for the benefit of rich people. What could go wrong? eom
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#63
DLC and Third Way Democrats are all in it for THEMSELVES. They do NOT CARE
closeupready
Feb 2015
#90
Capitalism and party mixed. What ever brings in more money for the campaign ...wins.
L0oniX
Feb 2015
#93
And the results of 'freeing themselves from positions that make it difficult to win'.
pa28
Feb 2015
#95
But, but Bill Clinton won a three way race 20+ years ago what else do you need to know?
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#98
We lost the House. We lost the Senate. We lost a majority of state legislatures...
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2015
#111