Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue Model Defends Cover As Empowering [View all]woolldog
(8,791 posts)115. They are genetic anomalies...which is why
they are paid so much. Similar to why great athletes are paid so much. Models' looks are a rare commodity just as athletic prowess as well is a rare commodity. Both make a lot of money and as a result pay those blessed with those qualities well. Simple supply and demand
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
211 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue Model Defends Cover As Empowering [View all]
NaturalHigh
Feb 2015
OP
I agree and will defend a woman's right to control her own body every time.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2015
#149
she's presuming to speak for other women. and to decide they're not feminists if they disagree
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#105
personal attack on the poster is a good way to demonstrate one's lack of an argument
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#176
Why? Why is she not allowed to have an opinion on what constitutes objectification, but others are?
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#58
I also don't see how bagging on the damn magazine endlessly is going to empower those women, either.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#80
If swimsuit models were paid less and ordinary women workers were paid more, it would be empowering.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#108
It would also have less than nothing to do with the point in question.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#114
try saline and plastic bags. which is why they look so preternaturally round and sharp edged.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#154
attack the poster is always a good way to demonstrate one's lack of an argument
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#175
yes, I'm sure models are the only people featured in sports illustrated
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#210
You funny. I'm old enough to be her grandma, and I've lived and observed my whole life.
Hekate
Feb 2015
#104
so you're saying that in order to feel that way, one must appear mostly naked in a men's magazine?
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#109
I think what is truly "problematic" is self-appointed arbiters of morality trying to tell consenting
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#24
Sometimes referred to as "controlling the gaze" by women's studies types...
HereSince1628
Feb 2015
#13
the models don't control where and at what men look. they're low on the totem pole.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#110
Whatever... when I wrote that it seemed the point of view was missing from the discussion
HereSince1628
Feb 2015
#161
The models aren't 'controlling the gaze'. They don't own the media, they don't set up the shots,
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#180
please link me to any claims of slavery for SI swimsuit models. Models are the least powerful
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#186
I looked just like Andy Gibb in my younger days. Now it's more like Andy Rooney. nt
benz380
Feb 2015
#23
Two of my high school classmates were featured in Playboy, and one in Penthouse.
hunter
Feb 2015
#92
Obviously. Is that why you felt compelled to bring it to everyone's attention?
Laffy Kat
Feb 2015
#78
empowerment is a subjective concept. At most basic level, "empowerment" shakes out to
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#51
Women on the "M' side of "S&M" find that to be an empowering experience also. n/t
DebJ
Feb 2015
#137
the career athlete will also likely have a short career. and despite the big bucks, most players
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#112
I know, at 25 years old we need to take her under our wing and teach her more
snooper2
Feb 2015
#171
If that's "gynecological", it's the most non-invasive gynecological exam I've ever heard of.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#61
I think the anecdotal horrified parent in the supermarket checkout line thing is overplayed.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#79
I disagree. Babies dying of measels is sad. Fundamentalists murdering cartoonists is sad.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#57
I don't think it's sad at all. Children being bombed is sad. People starving is sad.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#107
the andrea dworkin syndrome is fat middle-aged male pornography consumers' pretense that all
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#120
I have never understood people who think women have *ever* had veto power over other women.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#106
I don't think I should have veto power. But I do have, and will continue to always have
DebJ
Feb 2015
#136
Yeah, sure it is. I don't think it's "degrading," but all it does is use sex to sell whatever...
Hekate
Feb 2015
#95
I hope to live long enough to see a discussion on here about a man in such a pose on the SI cover.
DebJ
Feb 2015
#134
actually, supposedly playgirl was for men more than women -- had more male subscribers.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#145
Meanwhile, my fundy SIL went ballistic over the "pornographic" swimsuit issue
Ex Lurker
Feb 2015
#194