General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do folks here understand the expense and energy use associated with desalination plants? [View all]Journeyman
(15,492 posts)The need for massive amounts of energy to drive it, the ravages to oceanic life and the coastal impact from the intake, the seemingly intractable problem of saline disposal, and the ever-present issue of funding for construction and maintenance (witness the near-criminal response the plant at Huntington Beach, California has generated, what with the proposed requirement that participating water districts must pay for their full allotment of water no matter whether they need it or not in any given year).
The Pacific Institute has an informative report on the topic:
Desalination, With a Grain of Salt: A California Perspective
available for free download from the Institute's website:
http://pacinst.org/publication/desalination-with-a-grain-of-salt-a-california-perspective-2/
The potential benefits of ocean desalination are great, but the economic, cultural, and environmental costs of wide commercialization remain high. In many parts of the world, alternatives can provide the same freshwater benefits of ocean desalination at far lower economic and environmental costs. These alternatives include treating low-quality local water sources, encouraging regional water transfers, improving conservation and efficiency, accelerating wastewater recycling and reuse, and implementing smart land-use planning.
while UC Berkley hosted the author of the report, Heather Cooley, which the University posted to YouTube as part of its "California Colloquium on Water":
Thanks for your post, CreekDog. Too many people see that giant ocean next to us and seem to believe the answer to our problems is an easy answer away.
Personally, we'd be better off spending what money people want to throw at desalination in a more useful pursuit, helping farmers across the state develop more efficient irrigation methods -- drip instead of flood, for one.