Is Chomsky still on DU's "approved" comentator list?

[BrotherIvan]

121. I'm going to post this here as the reason why rhett of rick's comment was hidden

And it's disgusting. Can't argue the point, so alert stalk to try to get rid of the voice.


They are busy little bees, alerting, locking, hiding, and banning. Funny that they think of
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6222412

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

School yard nit picking and insults.
Admin: so this guy is a Host, and running around hurling insults and accusations at DU'ers. Completely inappropriate and always the same nasty behavior from this one. He has no business serving as a host if he's going to do this shit, and there's no indication that he's going to stop anytime soon.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Feb 14, 2015, 12:34 PM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This spurious hide had better go 7-0 to LEAVE IT. And the BOGer who alerted on it should be sent to the admins. This is the very definition of alert stalking. --Brother Ivan
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: rude and untrue. You are not the arbiter of what can or can not be said or done on Democratic underground
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: What an ugly and juvenile subthread this is. I would like to see most of it hidden. Why don't you all act like actual grownups and have a civil conversation…. or better yet, just put each other on ignore.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Administration's football, their rules. Simple, no?
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given