Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I see the anti-Hillary brigade is on another tear... [View all]brooklynite
(96,882 posts)38. "Elizabeth Warren's Money Machine"
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/296227/elizabeth-warrens-wall-street-money-machine-kevin-d-williamson
I highlighted those lines because the lawyer in question ("Wall Street Lawyers" as the article points out) is my wife. Don't recall Senator Warren having any issues cashing her check.
Elizabeth Warren has called Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown the poster boy for Goldman Sachs. Her aide Alethea Harney had this to say: Unlike with Scott Brown, middle-class families wont have to wonder whether Elizabeth Warren will choose them over Wall Street. And why might Scott Brown, who does not have particularly deep ties to Wall Street, choose distant financiers over the voters in his backyard? The answer, Professor Warren says, is filthy lucre, i.e. campaign donations. The Wall Street guys have been meeting aggressively to say, How many different ways can we fund Scott Brown to make sure Elizabeth Warren does not go to the United States Senate? she has charged. A Massachusetts Democratic spokesman, Kevin Franck, made a similar charge: Its no surprise that Wall Street and the big banks continue to finance Scott Browns campaign, because he continues to put their interests first, ahead of middle-class Massachusetts families.
Senator Brown shares with President Barack Obama the distinction of being a recipient of very generous campaign donations from Goldman Sachs, his third-largest contributor behind two Massachusetts mainstays: Boston-based Fidelity and Boston-based Liberty Mutual. If these donations make Senator Brown the poster child for Goldman Sachs, then we must think of a comparable epithet for Professor Warren, whose campaign also takes in a great deal of money from Wall Street or, in the interest of more precise metonymy, from the sewers beneath Wall Street. I am in general not much of an admirer of Wall Street bankers, but the bankers are scholars and gentlemen compared to Wall Street lawyers, who combine the rapacity and cleverness of the financier with the paid-by-the-hour-plus-a percentage complacency associated with the legal profession. With apologies to Matt Taibbi, Wall Street lawyers are the sort of people who give vampire squids a bad name.
...snip...
But Cleary Gottliebs beneficence is not limited to Ivy League law schools. At least one lawyer in the firm has donated to the Warren campaign, and Cleary Gottlieb has an apparent interest in Massachusetts Democrats: It was a very generous benefactor of John Kerrys presidential campaign. Beyond that donation to the Warren campaign proper, the firms relationship with Democrats is much deeper: Two of its attorneys by themselves have given more than $60,000 to the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, which will of course help Professor Warren. One gave another $9,200 to the DSCC, another gave $10,000 to the DNC Services Corp. The firm donates to the abortion fanatics at Emilys List, which Catholic Massachusetts might note is Professor Warrens largest single contributor, and the firm has made very generous contributions to the campaigns of such notable Democrats as Barack Obama, Kirsten Gillibrand, Al Franken, Mark Warner, and others. (Republicans? I found two donations to Mitt Romney. Check out the data yourself, if youre so inclined.)
Senator Brown shares with President Barack Obama the distinction of being a recipient of very generous campaign donations from Goldman Sachs, his third-largest contributor behind two Massachusetts mainstays: Boston-based Fidelity and Boston-based Liberty Mutual. If these donations make Senator Brown the poster child for Goldman Sachs, then we must think of a comparable epithet for Professor Warren, whose campaign also takes in a great deal of money from Wall Street or, in the interest of more precise metonymy, from the sewers beneath Wall Street. I am in general not much of an admirer of Wall Street bankers, but the bankers are scholars and gentlemen compared to Wall Street lawyers, who combine the rapacity and cleverness of the financier with the paid-by-the-hour-plus-a percentage complacency associated with the legal profession. With apologies to Matt Taibbi, Wall Street lawyers are the sort of people who give vampire squids a bad name.
...snip...
But Cleary Gottliebs beneficence is not limited to Ivy League law schools. At least one lawyer in the firm has donated to the Warren campaign, and Cleary Gottlieb has an apparent interest in Massachusetts Democrats: It was a very generous benefactor of John Kerrys presidential campaign. Beyond that donation to the Warren campaign proper, the firms relationship with Democrats is much deeper: Two of its attorneys by themselves have given more than $60,000 to the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, which will of course help Professor Warren. One gave another $9,200 to the DSCC, another gave $10,000 to the DNC Services Corp. The firm donates to the abortion fanatics at Emilys List, which Catholic Massachusetts might note is Professor Warrens largest single contributor, and the firm has made very generous contributions to the campaigns of such notable Democrats as Barack Obama, Kirsten Gillibrand, Al Franken, Mark Warner, and others. (Republicans? I found two donations to Mitt Romney. Check out the data yourself, if youre so inclined.)
I highlighted those lines because the lawyer in question ("Wall Street Lawyers" as the article points out) is my wife. Don't recall Senator Warren having any issues cashing her check.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
184 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hence, the claim that certain companies gave money to her is a bald-faced lie.
NYC Liberal
Feb 2015
#33
Bernie Sanders took money from HILLPAC--and that "Hill" doesn't stand for "The Hills are Alive with
MADem
Feb 2015
#153
Two other names close to corporations is Warren and Sanders, dont hear complaints about them.
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#20
I take Warren's statement to be truthful, perhaps open secrets did not go back
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#44
Makes sense. Like Scott Brown back then, they sure love Scott Walker there today!
RiverLover
Feb 2015
#80
The upthread comment was disbelief that Warren would take Wall Street money
brooklynite
Feb 2015
#84
I think someone whose spouse contributes thousands to Warren isn't "anti" Warren.
MADem
Feb 2015
#154
Took her years to pay off her campaign debt. LOL, some great support there. nt
Logical
Feb 2015
#148
Yeah fuck writting common sense legislation. The guy with the most expensive pony wins!
Rex
Feb 2015
#49
Everybody's donors crashed the economy. They give to everyone now. No one leaves a base
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2015
#112
You sure spend a lot of time talking about things that don't bother you. n/t
winter is coming
Feb 2015
#7
I appreciate the links. I had yet to Rec one of them, though I'd already seen the other two.
Electric Monk
Feb 2015
#12
People are "insulting" Hillary's policies. There will be a lot of that. That's part of politics.
djean111
Feb 2015
#48
I read how Warren was liberal because she supports increases in minimum wage,
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#17
Oh, yes forgot about testifying to Congress, namely Darrel Isis, not many has
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#64
Not only that, but she supports Hillary Clinton's candidacy. Oh yes, and exasperated by the
BlueCaliDem
Feb 2015
#180
"Anti-Hillary brigade"-- like the right-wingers claiming Bush Derangement Syndrome
LittleBlue
Feb 2015
#25
Yes, but those who only discovered income inequality in the past couple of years
BainsBane
Feb 2015
#92
Thanks for breaking it down into easy-to-understand, bite-sized pieces, Nance.
NBachers
Feb 2015
#104
I've supported HRC, to the hilt, ever since I watched her tell certain Christian conservative
msanthrope
Feb 2015
#168
Don't you know, as that poster opined, all bad things came from Bill Clinton being elected!!!
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#181
Pointing out reasons why a candidate is not acceptable, especially in a primary
davidpdx
Feb 2015
#35
After Sanders knocks her off in Iowa and New Hampshire (two venues that
KingCharlemagne
Feb 2015
#52
If Sanders knocks Clinton out of the race, I'll do my damndest to get him elected...
brooklynite
Feb 2015
#87
First of all, please allow me to applaud your party esprit. That is a laudable
KingCharlemagne
Feb 2015
#120
I do what I can. The more resistance she gets, the more likely someone electable will oppose her.
Vattel
Feb 2015
#63
Oops, I didn't express myself well. I didn't mean to imply that Clinton is not electable.
Vattel
Feb 2015
#178
You might be in the wrong place. The place that supports the other party is that-a-way------->>>>>>
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2015
#108
We've been in the "heat of election season", ostensibly, since the GOP began announcing candidates.
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2015
#167
When it comes to the Supreme Court, even centrist Democrats in the White House have come through.
cab67
Feb 2015
#118
I see an OP that has difficulty in distinguishing "anti-Hillary brigade" from...
MrMickeysMom
Feb 2015
#78
This is a newer version of DU. Callouts are not specifically prohibited but as Skinner says...
Phentex
Feb 2015
#122
So, great, then Hillary will cruise to victory. No need to be concerned or nervous
dissentient
Feb 2015
#107
I believe it was Nader who said that a GOP president is better for the far left
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2015
#111
The fringe left hates Hillary, and they don't mind using right-wing sources to get their hate on...
SidDithers
Feb 2015
#126
She'll get less turn out than Dem's did the last election session. In other words stomped.
harun
Feb 2015
#136