Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Question: What State Did Sen. Hillary Clinton Represent in 2002? [View all]Martin Eden
(15,671 posts)10. I have an answer to your question
You asked:
So, someone please tell me how Clinton went from being one of a majority of Senate Democrats to go along with the resolution to being the sole mastermind of the fiendish plot?
I'm answering for myself, but I'm pretty sure it applies to a large number of DUers who won't support Hillary in the Democratic primary.
Here's my answer:
She didn't, and I never asserted she was some kind of "sole mastermind" of this war crime.
The broom she's holding is made of straw, and so is the question you asked.
I have refused to vote for Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, John Kerry, or any other candidate in a Democratic primary who voted for the IWR in October 2002.
Have you considered that the focus is on Hillary's record now because she is the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination for president, and the others are not?
Our nation desperately needed strong and principled Democratic leadership when Cheney/Bush was beating the war drums for invading Iraq and manipulating the public with propaganda and OUTRIGHT LIES. If ever there was a test for national leadership and wisdom on foreign policy, this was it. The LIES and the catastrophic folly of this march to war were obvious to those with eyes to see.
Every member of Congress (slightly less than half the Dems in the House/Senate) who voted for the IWR was complicit. Not just Hillary. I was especially disappointed with John Kerry, who rose to national prominence as a leader of Vietnam Vets against that war. Giving GW Bush authority to invade Iraq is inexcusable for any person supposedly qualified for POTUS.
This, of course, is my opinion. Did you think at the time that invading Iraq was necessary and the right thing to do?
If so, I can understand why -- despite how it turned out -- you might trust Hillary Clinton and think her qualified to guide our nation in matters of war and peace. But if you didn't think invading Iraq was necessary and right, I really struggle to understand how anyone can possibly want her to be President of the United States.
Well, I did my best to answer your question. Please answer mine:
Did you think at the time that invading Iraq was necessary and the right thing to do?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Question: What State Did Sen. Hillary Clinton Represent in 2002? [View all]
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2015
OP
"in a Democratic primary" those are the key words. I didn't vote for Obama in the 2008 primary.
Autumn
Feb 2015
#21
I like Hillary, she's a lovely woman. I was able to talk to her on a couple of occasions on health
Autumn
Feb 2015
#136
But we were lied to about Saddam Hussein being behind the 9/11 attack. All of us.
CTyankee
Feb 2015
#44
It is not negative evidence Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. it was the lack of positive evidence
on point
Feb 2015
#128
"Bush had to launch the war before the UN basically said Bush assertions were a lie."
Martin Eden
Feb 2015
#139
Who lied to us? Bush? Who believed Bush? Colin Powell knew the truth but was a coward
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#68
The point is that smart people didn't trust Bush/Cheney. Smart people recognized
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#115
So you don't understand why many liberals/progressives are upset about her Iraq war vote? Seriously?
dissentient
Feb 2015
#13
All those who voted for the IWR and supported Bush's wars have blood on their hands.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2015
#14
Interesting the people who believe the IWR vote is a *real* political liability
wyldwolf
Feb 2015
#16
I very much doubt anyone who voted bought the six months thing, or the hang flowers around the necks
merrily
Feb 2015
#58
Let's guess your point. The Democrats betrayed their country because they thought
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#25
ffs, no one with two brain cells believed six months or the flowers around the necks of our troops
merrily
Feb 2015
#37
Actually, they voted "Yes" because they wanted Bush to have credibility....
Spitfire of ATJ
Feb 2015
#33
HRC was more than willing to support family friend George Bush and his illegal war.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#28
"Hey look over there, there are other people that betrayed their constituents, party
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#24
Other people who don't seem to be running for President to boot. Who didn't all advocate for the
merrily
Feb 2015
#32
You don't commit blood and treasure because your constituents might feel safer if you do.
merrily
Feb 2015
#39
Re-read what you wrote, I did. I think nations often do commit blood and treasure for security
HereSince1628
Feb 2015
#45
Are you honestly calling yourself a victim of 9/11 because you got laid off?
Capt. Obvious
Feb 2015
#127
To me, losing my job was worse than having to take off my shoes at the airport.
Jim Lane
Feb 2015
#135
Hey, I have an idea. Let's just hand over the White House to someone who didn't vote for
libdem4life
Feb 2015
#38
Uh, that's what it seems to be as we write here and what the hubub is all about. No one else cares
libdem4life
Feb 2015
#79
So sorry...so used to the sarcasm and snark here...thanks for clearing it up.
libdem4life
Feb 2015
#156
And ten years later, after all the mistakes and bloodshed, she pushes for Afghanistan "surge", and
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#50
To me, her vote on the Iraqi war is just one disconcerting event among many.
Half-Century Man
Feb 2015
#51
It was not just a vote either. She urged her fellow Senators to vote for the invasion.
merrily
Feb 2015
#52
I don't know what questions you have about it. She advocated for the Iraq Invasion and did so
merrily
Feb 2015
#56
Fair enough. She has spoken about some of those things, esp. why she did not read the NIE.
merrily
Feb 2015
#72
It means we can COUNT ON HER! ....To do the politically expedient thing, if not the right one.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#85
I am a NYer and I support her, but I did protest Hillary's and Chuck's office for their votes.
hrmjustin
Feb 2015
#76
A majority of Democratic Senators voted for the war. Hillary was a junior member of the Senate.
Agnosticsherbet
Feb 2015
#92
If you want to blame a Democrat, blam Tom Dashel to Democrat in the Senate
Agnosticsherbet
Feb 2015
#96
I don't hate Hillary anymore for her vote but I lived in New York at the time and called
Cha
Feb 2015
#88
You realize that Bush and Cheney could use that exact same rationale, right?
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#89
Normally, the spineless assholes on this site would alert an attack like yours.
Buzz Clik
Feb 2015
#130
I'm not alerting you, you're not alerting me. Maybe someone will get one or the other of us.
DisgustipatedinCA
Feb 2015
#134
That she was joined by others in a cowardly response to war hysteria is supposed to--
eridani
Feb 2015
#116
So we're defending her support of the war machine now? I thought we were past this.
craigmatic
Feb 2015
#121
No, just a few here are doing that. Most of us still use critical thinking skills and common sense.
Rex
Feb 2015
#145
This is quite possibly the lamest attempt at Clinton apologia I've seen on this site
Capt. Obvious
Feb 2015
#126
Who has accused her of being the mastermind, sole or otherwise? Phony, absurd, lame excuses
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#140
Am I correct that EVERYONE holding this vote against Clinton voted against Kerry in 2004?
brooklynite
Feb 2015
#152