I see the anti-Hillary brigade is on another tear...

[LWolf]

143. Of course,

your post that I responded to said nothing about whether or not it will be a (D) or an (R) elected as the next POTUS, so that's not what I responded to. Trying to shove a lesser evil down voters' throats IS a "scare tactic," it's true. Trying to do so before any candidates have even announced their candidacy, instead of working hard to get a better Democrat nominated, is a pathetic tactic. That IS what I'm focused on; potential PRIMARY candidates. I haven't anointed HRC and jumped forward into GE campaigning before the primaries even begin.

I think Warren keeps popping up because so many are desperate for ANYBODY but HRC, and Warren and Sanders are the most outspoken opponent to neo-liberalism at this point. Still, they aren't the only possibilities, and until the primary campaign season is actually under way, I haven't picked a candidate to support. That I won't be supporting neo-liberals, including HRC, is simply a given, and has nothing whatsoever to do with Warren's plans.

The bottom line is that those in dire straits, and there are way, way too many at this point, will not be served by a Republican in the WH; neither will they be served by a neo-liberal. Since I don't want the (D) in your declaration of fact to be a neo-liberal, I will be pushing any non-neo-liberal willing to run against her.