General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I see the anti-Hillary brigade is on another tear... [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)Every political race, whether for POTUS or otherwise, is between the "lesser of two evils", in that all politicians are flawed human beings, as prone to making poor decisions as everyone else. The search for the perfect candidate who will cure all ills is a fantasy, perpetuated by those who believe such a candidate exists.
But you are free to push your "non-neo-liberal" candidate - just as soon as you determine who that "non-neo-liberal" is.
It's too bad you didn't think to do so before now. It's also too bad that polls/surveys show that the Party as a whole is satisfied with HRC as their potential nominee - whether you personally like it or not.
HRC's running for POTUS in 2016 has been pretty much a given since 2008. Speaking up against her potential run might have made an impact at any point over the past six-plus years - but speaking up at what is, politically speaking, the "last minute" has little value.
But, hey - good luck with attempting to catapult that "nominee to be announced later" into a presidential campaign that, for all intents and purposes, is already underway. I'm sure that whoever you finally come up with will dazzle the populace and be swept into office.