Are Your Medications Safe?

[Orrex]

28. Ironically, your response is symptomatic of an anti-science mentality

No further discussion is necessary, really.

Your unwillingness to consider a view that differs from your own is an explicit rejection of peer review. That is, you've formulated your conclusions in the absence of evidence, and no one can convince you that your conclusions might be faulty. That's about as anti-science as you can get, no matter how much you insist that you're not anti-science.

Rather than engage rationally with the subject, you react emotionally to what you identify as "the typical response," implying some kind of plot by Monsanto and the FDA to corrupt your precious bodily fluids or whatever.

When you simply close your eyes, jam your fingers in your ears and wail about the evils of Monsanto, you look and sound like an anti-science crank. Show your evidence and let us discuss it.

Otherwise, accept that you're pushing an anti-science agenda, and move on.