Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warpy

(114,614 posts)
10. What the hell good would that do, Ed?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 12:11 AM
Feb 2015

You been talking to Grandpa McCain lately?

Honestly, every war we get into sets up the next one, the exception being WWII and that was due to the Marshall Plan, something that would never get past Republicans now.

We need to stop meddling in the Middle East, let them sort their own shit out. No, we won't like what they end up with, especially in the short term. It's just not our fight.

Do we put pressure on ISIL in other ways? Oh, you bet we do, through cheap oil and bombing the facilities they're using to steal oil in the region to sell it to finance their war against everybody who isn't them. We should also be providing humanitarian aid to people who have had to run for their lives.

Sending in the military? No way, Ed. We already know how that goes and so do they.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We never do anything right. cwydro Feb 2015 #1
Lies resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths and quagmire versus Obama and no ground troops - no difference at all. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #3
Just an FYI.. might be a coincidence.. maybe not.. Cha Feb 2015 #18
doesn't the new War Powers request include ground troops? DrDan Feb 2015 #26
If you have not read the three page document....do not forget it was a blank cheque before. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #27
does it include the use of ground troops? DrDan Feb 2015 #30
there's no ******* comparison to what President Obama is doing to try and keep us safe and Cha Feb 2015 #12
The fact the limited authorization has a 3 year limit is driving the War Hawks mad with rage. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #28
Ed should stick to domestic affairs and union stuff, his foreign affairs knowledge is abysmal. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #2
Yeah he was for the Keystone pipeline too but he changed his mind neverforget Feb 2015 #5
Obama was for the pipeline? When? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #6
No Ed Schultz neverforget Feb 2015 #7
Schultz? I see. Because the Teamsters wanted it for the temporary jobs? At least he changed. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #8
Two threads here now, one saying Matthews is beating the war drum, now this. merrily Feb 2015 #4
I'm going to guess More War! neverforget Feb 2015 #9
What the hell good would that do, Ed? Warpy Feb 2015 #10
It'd fatten the MIC's profits neverforget Feb 2015 #11
Plus, jobs for the unemployed, with no need to fund a retirement package. n/t winter is coming Feb 2015 #15
We won't like it? JonLP24 Feb 2015 #19
We already have ground troops in Iraq mwrguy Feb 2015 #13
we do but this would be on a scale like the 2003 invasion neverforget Feb 2015 #23
FFS, the last thing you should do is voluntarily escalate a religious war. winter is coming Feb 2015 #14
Ed Shultz is terrible JonLP24 Feb 2015 #16
He's pretty good on labor issues neverforget Feb 2015 #17
I liked him at first JonLP24 Feb 2015 #20
yeah. I don't get him but maybe that's the former Republican in him neverforget Feb 2015 #21
EDIT: freshwest Feb 2015 #22
That is what I was thinking. GE/MSNBC wanted every one to talk about the ISIS situation. Ed did. jwirr Feb 2015 #29
Your republican roots are showing again Ed. geomon666 Feb 2015 #24
IIRC, Ed originally supported the war in Iraq too. So at least he's a consistent KingCharlemagne Feb 2015 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ed Schultz thinks we shou...»Reply #10