Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
10. Elizabeth Warren & Rachel Maddow are talking about it (along with Bernie)
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:46 AM
Feb 2015
Social Security faces threat from ‘ideological war’
02/12/15 12:36 PM—Updated 02/12/15

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) sent a message to supporters yesterday, warning of a real threat to Social Security. By any fair measure, she’s right.

“We’ve known for years that Social Security Disability Insurance is set to run low in 2016, and most people assumed that another bipartisan reallocation was coming,” the senator wrote. “But now, thanks to the Republican ideological war on our most important national safety net, disabled Americans could suddenly face a 20% cut in their Social Security checks next year.”

Let’s recap for those just joining us. The Social Security system provides disability payments to Americans who want to work but can’t for health reasons. For generations, when the disability-insurance program runs short on funds, Congress transfers money from elsewhere in the Social Security system to prevent benefit cuts. The solution, sometimes called “reallocation,” has never been especially controversial – in fact, it’s been done 11 times over the last seven decades.

But last month, congressional Republicans adopted a rule change that makes it almost impossible to approve the usual, straightforward fix. GOP lawmakers seem to want to create the conditions for a crisis.

All of which led to an important Senate hearing yesterday.


Carolyn Colvin, acting commissioner for the Social Security Administration, urged senators to act first to avert the crisis at hand and then begin serious negotiations on finding a longer-term solution. She said the threatened cut in disability payments – about 19 percent – would be a “death sentence” for many of the poorest recipients, but time and again, she refused to opine on more concrete options going forward.

When Colvin read aloud the president’s six principles for future reforms, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was scornful. “That’s a set of principles that makes sure we do absolutely nothing meaningful,” Graham said. “If that’s the president’s plan, we’ll never get there.”

And by “meaningful,” it appears Graham and other Senate Republicans are waiting for the White House to propose cuts to Social Security. (Ironically, President Obama was open to modest Social Security cuts as part of a grand bargain with GOP lawmakers, but Republicans have refused to consider any possible concessions and effectively ruled out the possibility of a compromise.)

The Politico report added that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the Senate Budget Committee’s ranking member, “angrily accused the GOP of ‘manufacturing a crisis’ to hide its intent to resurrect past proposals to cut Social Security benefits and privatize the system.”...

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/social-security-faces-threat-ideological-war

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It is either because the media isn't reporting it, the Democrats are too lazy to bring it up, or still_one Feb 2015 #1
It's because the media is paid to not report it ... Scuba Feb 2015 #3
Which Democrats are paid to not report it? tridim Feb 2015 #5
Well, we could start with those who are tight with Pete Peterson. Scuba Feb 2015 #7
I'm not a Hillary supporter, but no, neither of them are "paid" to cover up GOP bullshit. tridim Feb 2015 #8
Take a look at the Democrats in Congress who receive contributions from Wall Street. Scuba Feb 2015 #9
That is all (or almost all) of them, isn't it? FrodosPet Feb 2015 #11
Are you really trying to compare that to Clinton's laundry list? think Feb 2015 #29
Because the hidden violence of willfully starving the disabled is less sexy than ISIS. n/t winter is coming Feb 2015 #2
Because rtracey Feb 2015 #4
Lost me after the third word. world wide wally Feb 2015 #6
Elizabeth Warren & Rachel Maddow are talking about it (along with Bernie) RiverLover Feb 2015 #10
Thank goodness for them..... daleanime Feb 2015 #14
So many issues... freebrew Feb 2015 #12
Many Republicans are evil to the very core of their rotten souls. olegramps Feb 2015 #13
because disabled Americans collecting Social Security Disablity mountain grammy Feb 2015 #15
Have they proposed anything? madville Feb 2015 #16
We can talk about it, can't we? Jack Rabbit Feb 2015 #17
VIRTUES??? RoBear Feb 2015 #18
because it could be more difficult to defend than you might expect Amishman Feb 2015 #19
Because years of propaganda served up by the likes of Rush Limbaugh works kickysnana Feb 2015 #20
Because Fox "news" is 27/7/365 telling americans workinclasszero Feb 2015 #21
I am terrified for my siblings dsc Feb 2015 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author CountAllVotes Feb 2015 #28
I can't live undergroundpanther Feb 2015 #23
It is difficult enough as it is for me CountAllVotes Feb 2015 #27
Because it would be costly to talk about obvious problems in this country? Rex Feb 2015 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author Enthusiast Feb 2015 #25
Because M$M is nothing more than a propaganda machine for those who can pay for it. liberal N proud Feb 2015 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Is No One Talking Abo...»Reply #10