Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ACLU prohibited from joining gang rap case [View all]Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)56. This nation was formed in part to stop the trend
of forcing people to pay tribute. Of legislating one person's profit at another's expense.
Looks like jerks want to go back to a monarchy, back to zero rights, back to forcing the "little guy or gal" to pay for the toys of the rich through low wages, imprisonment and disenfranchisement.
Maybe when the next generation wakes up from their video game stupor ( the boomers are frickin hopeless to save anything - even themselves - as they've been in a lala-land stupor ) they'll begin to take back the rights we've let slip away.
There's always a tipping point. This case may not be it, but one will arise, and then perhaps the younger generations will renew what this nation was supposed to be.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If they allowed amicus briefs on one side, they'd have to allow them on the other
onenote
Feb 2015
#7
That's true - but this is a novel prosecutorial theory, and if a conviction occurred,
Yo_Mama
Feb 2015
#13
You don't need a Weatherman to know which way the wind blows. (Bob Dylan, who once claimed he
merrily
Feb 2015
#36