Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They don't represent Islam YarnAddict Feb 2015 #1
+1 TexasMommaWithAHat Feb 2015 #5
Then it would be appropriate to refer to Baruch Goldstein as a "Jewish terrorist", and Meir Kahane still_one Feb 2015 #7
+1. This is only an issue because Obama (and team) decided to start the practice of not saying it. Dawgs Feb 2015 #15
Yes....if they're called Islamic terrorists rather than terrorists Cali_Democrat Feb 2015 #22
it appears our media is promoting a holy war. spanone Feb 2015 #2
BBC Radio calls them radical Islamists TexasMommaWithAHat Feb 2015 #4
And if Obama also called them radical Islamists.... Cali_Democrat Feb 2015 #23
It's what they are. TexasMommaWithAHat Feb 2015 #24
Actually, he isn't spending much time on it Cali_Democrat Feb 2015 #27
What if Obama has a reason which cannot be disclosed for... JaneyVee Feb 2015 #3
Of course, it's a Murdoch rag C_U_L8R Feb 2015 #6
Well, the NYP doesn't represent Journalism either n/t n2doc Feb 2015 #8
Why do they get outraged over Obama not saying "Islamic terror", but not saying "Sunni terror"? ck4829 Feb 2015 #9
Your distinction is appropriate, but I suspect the media intentionally does still_one Feb 2015 #10
Labelling games are ludicrous. The focus on solutions and not labelling is giving Fox a sad. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #12
Rupert Murdoch wants a Holy War....just like ISIS does...who is the most dangerous enemy? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #11
It looks that way, and that's what ISIS wants fadedrose Feb 2015 #14
The Post should look into what ISIS really wants.. fadedrose Feb 2015 #13
Based on that logic, we should call the Ku Klux Klan Christian terrorists. muntrv Feb 2015 #16
Actually that is the problem, selective labeling still_one Feb 2015 #17
i've seen outrageous NY Post covers Enrique Feb 2015 #18
I think it is the implication that he turns a blind eye toward terrorism still_one Feb 2015 #19
Is it Islamic? Yes. Is it terrorist? Yes. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2015 #20
there is a good strategic reason not to say it Enrique Feb 2015 #21
The New York Post is to journalism what arsenic is to nutrition. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2015 #25
so there is no safe level guillaumeb Feb 2015 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New York Post Puts A Blin...»Reply #14