Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)

25. How do you pay machines more? And how do you then pay the displaced people?

Reply to Recursion (Original post)

Sun Apr 29, 2012, 03:26 PM

Apr 2012

Not sure how one would do this without manufacturing money as well.

On the other hand, if they get together with their neighbors and start to create assets, they could use the overhead that used to go to CEO's for themselves.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nine words that are an easy way to protect Medicare and Social Security in perpetuity [View all] Recursion Apr 2012 OP

+1. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #1

Thanks; that was actually the result of our argument the other day Recursion Apr 2012 #2

can you link me? forgot the context. thanks for letting me know, good to know HiPointDem Apr 2012 #5

It was you and Romulux Recursion Apr 2012 #6

thanks. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #9

I can do it in 10 letters! Uben Apr 2012 #3

Ah, that's a different way to do it. Recursion Apr 2012 #4

Well, ProSense Apr 2012 #12

Want to know my ideal, dream tax structure? Recursion Apr 2012 #18

You're right ProSense Apr 2012 #23

Productivity can be influenced..... Uben Apr 2012 #31

That isn't as high as you may think. dkf Apr 2012 #7

Are those figures mean annual or total for the period in question? (nt) Recursion Apr 2012 #10

Annual. dkf Apr 2012 #15

Wow. I'm assuming those are constant dollars? Recursion Apr 2012 #19

No idea. dkf Apr 2012 #26

1947 to 73 wages tracked productivity. 73 on, they were flat. so those losses are very big. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #16

That's a graph of the neocon revolution as a whole..but where's the last ten years? saras Apr 2012 #27

rising wages matching rising productivity = ldf Apr 2012 #8

I hate America because it sent me to Iraq Recursion Apr 2012 #13

What about all those lost years of productivity since 1978? kentuck Apr 2012 #11

Well, that would be an awesome world, but even if we started tomorrow it would solve... Recursion Apr 2012 #14

Would that be overall, industry by industry, or workplace by workplace or job by job? Igel Apr 2012 #17

biggest productivity gains have gone to the biggest players. the ones currently HiPointDem Apr 2012 #20

Great questions! I don't know the answer Recursion Apr 2012 #21

And remove the cap. n/t ProfessionalLeftist Apr 2012 #22

I'm all for that, but it's not necessary if wages kept rising Recursion Apr 2012 #24

How do you pay machines more? And how do you then pay the displaced people? jtuck004 Apr 2012 #25

Why not just put a lasso around the moon and give it to me? hfojvt Apr 2012 #28

Actually that itself would not work Recursion Apr 2012 #29

I guess that would make me a perfect ten hfojvt Apr 2012 #30