Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

mythology

(9,527 posts)

9. Well he's certainly threatening imminent harm

Reply to MohRokTah (Original post)

Sat Feb 21, 2015, 01:27 PM

Feb 2015

Hopefully the Supreme Court settles this correctly when they decide this term.

These last gasp attempts would be funny if they weren't causing actual harm to the couples who are having their rights violated.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Breaking: 'Harm Is Imminent' � Texas Goes To State Supreme Court To Void Lesbians' Marriage [View all] MohRokTah Feb 2015 OP

what extreme hatred and fear in these mental midget minds spanone Feb 2015 #1

How horrific! This AG is a mental case IMO. How hateful, crude, ignorant and diabolical! n/t RKP5637 Feb 2015 #2

And the Texas Supreme Court is made up of NUTS! MohRokTah Feb 2015 #3

I don't want to be negative toward Texas, DUers are there, but it's one more state I RKP5637 Feb 2015 #7

Dammit shenmue Feb 2015 #4

They're in complete terror of their heads exploding! MoonRiver Feb 2015 #5

They're afraid of losing a fundraising demographic. n/t Orsino Feb 2015 #11

Spending money from the public coffers .... etherealtruth Feb 2015 #6

And denying them those rights for what earthly reason. It just gets so unbelievable, how far this RKP5637 Feb 2015 #8

Well he's certainly threatening imminent harm mythology Feb 2015 #9

The panel of impartial judges will no doubt deliver a verdict based soley on the facts and law without Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #10

Definitely, that's just how they'll handle it. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #12

AG Paxton is a crook who admitted to breaking the securities laws an idiot Gothmog Feb 2015 #13

These states that are throwing a fit now are just lobbying the SCOTUS in a very open way. The jwirr Feb 2015 #14

"Imminent harm" is not gonna cut it. Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2015 #15

Refineries exploding... boring. Uninsured people... Maybe they want that. Gay Marriage... OH NO!!!! ck4829 Feb 2015 #16

What harm is imminent? WTF? uppityperson Feb 2015 #17

I'd love to see their definition of "imminent harm". hifiguy Feb 2015 #18