Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
36. she can easily dispel it with her own record...
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 01:45 PM
Feb 2015

Strongly Favors topic 1:
Abortion is a woman's unrestricted right
(+5 points on Social scale)

Lift ban on stem cell research to cure devastating diseases: Favors topic 1
Respect Roe v. Wade, but make adoptions easier too: Favors topic 1
Alternatives to pro-choice like forced pregnancy in Romania: Strongly Favors topic 1
Must safeguard constitutional rights, including choice: Favors topic 1
Remain vigilant on a woman’s right to chose: Favors topic 1
Keep abortion safe, legal and rare: Favors topic 1
Being pro-choice is not being pro-abortion: Favors topic 1
Supports parental notice & family planning: Opposes topic 1
No abortion for sex selection in China: Opposes topic 1
Voted liberal line on partial birth & harm to fetus: Favors topic 1
Endorsed Recommended by EMILY's List of pro-choice women: Favors topic 1
Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record: Strongly Favors topic 1
Expand embryonic stem cell research: Favors topic 1
Sponsored bill providing contraceptives for low-income women: Favors topic 1
Sponsored bill for emergency contraception for rape victims: Favors topic 1
Rated 0% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice stance: Strongly Favors topic 1
Provide emergency contraception at military facilities: Favors topic 1
Ensure access to and funding for contraception: Favors topic 1
Focus on preventing pregnancy, plus emergency contraception: Favors topic 1
NO on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion: Strongly Favors topic 1
NO on defining unborn child as eligible for SCHIP: Favors topic 1
NO on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life: Strongly Favors topic 1
NO on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime: Favors topic 1
YES on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives: Favors topic 1
NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions: Favors topic 1
YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines: Favors topic 1

Strongly Favors topic 2:
Legally require hiring women & minorities
(-5 points on Economic scale)

Some world leaders are still misogynistic: Favors topic 2
Some world leaders are still misogynistic: Favors topic 2
We’ve come a long way on race, but we have a long way to go: Strongly Favors topic 2
Apologize for slavery, but concentrate on civil rights now: Favors topic 2
Human rights are women’s rights: Neutral on topic 2
Women’s rights are human rights: Favors topic 2
OpEd: "18 million cracks" meant "lingering sexism": Strongly Favors topic 2
Equal pay is not yet equal: Strongly Favors topic 2
1988: Instituted gender diversity Report Card within ABA: Strongly Opposes topic 2
Argued with Bill Clinton about diluting affirmative action: Strongly Favors topic 2
Shift from group preferences to economic empowerment of all: Neutral on topic 2
Sponsored bill maintaining role of women in armed forces: Favors topic 2
Rated 96% by the NAACP, indicating a pro-affirmative-action stance: Strongly Favors topic 2
Recognize Juneteenth as historical end of slavery: Strongly Favors topic 2
Re-introduce the Equal Rights Amendment: Strongly Favors topic 2
Reinforce anti-discrimination and equal-pay requirements: Favors topic 2
Ban discriminatory compensation; allow 2 years to sue: Favors topic 2
Sponsored bill enforcing against gender pay discrimination: Strongly Favors topic 2

Strongly Favors topic 3:
Comfortable with same-sex marriage
(+5 points on Social scale)

Increase America’s commitment against Global AIDS: Favors topic 3
I re-evaluated & changed my mind on gay marriage: Favors topic 3
DOMA discrimination holds us back from a more perfect union: Strongly Favors topic 3
I support gay marriage personally and as law: Strongly Favors topic 3
Let states decide gay marriage; they’re ahead of feds: Favors topic 3
2004:defended traditional marriage; 2006:voted for same-sex: Strongly Favors topic 3
Federal Marriage Amendment would be terrible step backwards: Favors topic 3
Gays deserve domestic partnership benefits: Strongly Favors topic 3
Military service based on conduct, not sexual orientation: Favors topic 3
More funding and stricter sentencing for hate crimes: Strongly Favors topic 3
Rated 89% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance: Strongly Favors topic 3
Provide benefits to domestic partners of Federal employees: Strongly Favors topic 3
YES on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes: Strongly Favors topic 3
NO on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage: Strongly Favors topic 3

No opinion on topic 4:
Keep God in the public sphere
(0 points on Social scale)

Partner with faith based community in empowerment zones: Strongly Favors topic 4
Tap into churches to avoid more Louima & Diallo cases: Favors topic 4
Community involvement helps, but only in short term: Favors topic 4
Link payments to good parenting behavior: Opposes topic 4
Allow student prayer, but no religious instruction: Opposes topic 4
Character education: teach empathy & self-discipline: Favors topic 4
Change what kids see in the media: Favors topic 4
Co-sponsored bill to criminalize flag-burning: Favors topic 4
Rated 0% by the Christian Coalition: an anti-Family-Value voting record: Strongly Opposes topic 4
Rated 100% by the AU, indicating support of church-state separation: Strongly Opposes topic 4
NO on recommending Constitutional ban on flag desecration: Opposes topic 4

Strongly Favors topic 5:
Expand ObamaCare
(-5 points on Economic scale)

Outcry if AIDS were leading disease of young whites: Favors topic 5
Lower costs and improve quality and cover everybody: Strongly Favors topic 5
Supply more medical needs of families, & insure all children: Strongly Favors topic 5
Medicare should be strengthened today: Favors topic 5
Smaller steps to progress on health care: Favors topic 5
Guaranteed benefits & focus on prevention: Neutral on topic 5
2006: If I can't do universal coverage, why run?: Strongly Favors topic 5
Universal health care will not work if it is voluntary: Strongly Favors topic 5
Universal health care coverage by the end of my second term: Strongly Favors topic 5
We need a uniquely American solution to health care: Favors topic 5
Health care initiatives are her first priority in Senate: Strongly Favors topic 5
Establish "report cards" on HMO quality of care: Favors topic 5
Invest funds to alleviate the nursing shortage: Favors topic 5
Let states make bulk Rx purchases, and other innovations: Opposes topic 5
Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record: Strongly Favors topic 5
Preserve access to Medicaid & SCHIP during economic downturn: Strongly Favors topic 5
NO on means-testing to determine Medicare Part D premium: Favors topic 5
NO on funding GOP version of Medicare prescription drug benefit: Favors topic 5
NO on $40 billion per year for limited Medicare prescription drug benefit: Opposes topic 5
YES on increasing Medicaid rebate for producing generics: Favors topic 5
YES on negotiating bulk purchases for Medicare prescription drug: Strongly Favors topic 5
YES on expanding enrollment period for Medicare Part D: Favors topic 5
NO on limiting medical liability lawsuits to $250,000: Opposes topic 5
YES on requiring negotiated Rx prices for Medicare part D: Favors topic 5
YES on overriding veto on expansion of Medicare: Favors topic 5

Strongly Opposes topic 6:
Privatize Social Security
(-5 points on Economic scale)

1997: Hillary warned against privatizing Social Security: Strongly Opposes topic 6
Soc.Sec. one of greatest inventions in American democracy: Strongly Opposes topic 6
Social Security protects families, not just retirees: Strongly Opposes topic 6
All should join the debate now to preserve future solvency: Opposes topic 6
Create Retirement Savings Accounts: Favors topic 6
Rated 100% by the ARA, indicating a pro-senior voting record: Strongly Opposes topic 6
NO on establishing reserve funds & pre-funding for Social Security: Opposes topic 6

Strongly Opposes topic 7:
Vouchers for school choice
(-5 points on Economic scale)

OpEd: Common Core recycled from Clintons in 1980s and 1990s: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Fully fund special education & 21st century classrooms: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Supports public school choice; but not private nor parochial: Opposes topic 7
Vouchers drain money from public schools: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Fight with Gore for public schools; no voucher “gimmicks”: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Charter schools provide choice within public system: Opposes topic 7
Vouchers siphon off much-needed resources: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Parents can choose, but support public schools: Opposes topic 7
Supports public school choice and charter schools: Favors topic 7
Solemn vow never to abandon our public schools: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Offer every parent Charter Schools and public school choice: Opposes topic 7
Rated 82% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes: Strongly Opposes topic 7
YES on funding smaller classes instead of private tutors: Opposes topic 7
YES on funding student testing instead of private tutors: Opposes topic 7
YES on $5B for grants to local educational agencies: Opposes topic 7

Strongly Opposes topic 8:
No 'rights' to clean air and water
(+5 points on Social scale)

$5B for green-collar jobs in economic stimulus package: Opposes topic 8
Voted against and consistently opposed to Yucca Mountain: Strongly Opposes topic 8
Scored 100% on Humane Society Scorecard on animal protection: Strongly Opposes topic 8
Remove PCBs from Hudson River by dredging 200 miles: Opposes topic 8
Rated 89% by the LCV, indicating pro-environment votes: Strongly Opposes topic 8
EPA must do better on mercury clean-up: Opposes topic 8
Grants for beach water pollution under Clean Water Act: Opposes topic 8
Strengthen prohibitions against animal fighting: Strongly Opposes topic 8

Opposes topic 9:
Stricter punishment reduces crime
(+2 points on Social scale)

Longtime advocate of death penalty, with restrictions: Strongly Favors topic 9
Address the unacceptable increase in incarceration: Opposes topic 9
Mandatory sentences have been too widely used: Strongly Opposes topic 9
Give kids after-school activities to prevent gangs: Opposes topic 9
Spend more time with kids to prevent violence: Opposes topic 9
Supports citizen patrols & 3-Strikes-You’re-Out: Favors topic 9
Supports “Three Strikes” and more prison: Strongly Favors topic 9
End hate crimes and other intolerance: Favors topic 9
Require DNA testing for all federal executions: Opposes topic 9
Increase funding for "COPS ON THE BEAT" program: Opposes topic 9
Reduce recidivism by giving offenders a Second Chance: Strongly Opposes topic 9
YES on reinstating $1.15 billion funding for the COPS Program: Opposes topic 9

Strongly Opposes topic 10:
Absolute right to gun ownership
(-5 points on Economic scale)

Rein in idea that anybody can have a gun anywhere, anytime: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Against illegal guns, crack down on illegal gun dealers: Opposes topic 10
Get assault weapons & guns off the street: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Background check system could prevent Virginia Tech massacre: Opposes topic 10
Congress’ failure at Littleton response inspired Senate run: Opposes topic 10
Limit access to weapons; look for early warning signs: Opposes topic 10
License and register all handgun sales: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Gun control protects our children: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Don’t water down sensible gun control legislation: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Lock up guns; store ammo separately: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Get weapons off the streets; zero tolerance for weapons: Opposes topic 10
Prevent unauthorized firearm use with "smart gun" technology: Opposes topic 10
NO on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence: Strongly Opposes topic 10
NO on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers: Strongly Opposes topic 10

Strongly Favors topic 11:
Higher taxes on the wealthy
(-5 points on Economic scale)

Rescind tax cuts for those making more than $250,000 a year: Strongly Favors topic 11
Pay down debt & cut taxes within balanced budget: Favors topic 11
GOP tax plan would hurt New York’s students: Favors topic 11
Rated 21% by NTU, indicating a "Big Spender" on tax votes: Strongly Favors topic 11
Rated 80% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation: Strongly Favors topic 11
NO on raising the Death Tax exemption to $5M from $1M: Strongly Favors topic 11
NO on allowing AMT reduction without budget offset: Favors topic 11
YES on reducing marriage penalty instead of cutting top tax rates: Favors topic 11
YES on spending $448B of tax cut on education & debt reduction: Favors topic 11
NO on $350 billion in tax breaks over 11 years: Strongly Favors topic 11
YES on extending the tax cuts on capital gains and dividends: Strongly Opposes topic 11
YES on $47B for military by repealing capital gains tax cut: Favors topic 11
YES on retaining reduced taxes on capital gains & dividends: Strongly Opposes topic 11
NO on permanently repealing the `death tax`: Strongly Favors topic 11
NO on supporting permanence of estate tax cuts: Strongly Favors topic 11
NO on raising estate tax exemption to $5 million: Strongly Favors topic 11
NO on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax: Strongly Favors topic 11

Favors topic 12:
Pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens
(+2 points on Social scale)

Introduce a path to earn citizenship in the first 100 days: Strongly Favors topic 12
Consider halting certain raids on illegal immigrant families: Favors topic 12
Deporting all illegal immigrants is unrealistic: Strongly Favors topic 12
Illegal immigrants with driver’s licenses puts them at risk: Opposes topic 12
Oppose granting driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants: Opposes topic 12
More border patrolling on both Mexican AND Canadian borders: Opposes topic 12
Anti-immigrant bill would have criminalized Jesus Christ: Strongly Favors topic 12
Sanctuary cities ok; local police can’t enforce immigration: Favors topic 12
Comprehensive reform to get 12 million out of shadows: Strongly Favors topic 12
Sponsored bill covering child resident aliens under Medicaid: Favors topic 12
Sponsored bill funding social services for noncitizens: Favors topic 12
Rated 8% by USBC, indicating an open-border stance: Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on continuing federal funds for declared "sanctuary cities": Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security: Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on giving Guest Workers a path to citizenship: Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on establishing a Guest Worker program: Favors topic 12
YES on building a fence along the Mexican border: Strongly Opposes topic 12
YES on eliminating the "Y" nonimmigrant guestworker program: Neutral topic 12
NO on declaring English as the official language of the US government: Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on comprehensive immigration reform: Strongly Favors topic 12

Favors topic 13:
Support & expand free trade
(+2 points on Economic scale)

Chief advocate for Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Strongly Favors topic 13
TPP agreement creates more growth and better growth: Favors topic 13
Smart, pro-American trade: NAFTA has hurt workers: Strongly Opposes topic 13
No fast-track authority for this president: Opposes topic 13
Defended outsourcing of US jobs to India: Favors topic 13
1980s: Loved Wal-Mart's "Buy America" program: Opposes topic 13
Globalization should not substitute for humanization: Opposes topic 13
Supports MFN for China, despite concerns over human rights: Strongly Favors topic 13
Build a rule-based global trading system: Favors topic 13
Rated 17% by CATO, indicating a pro-fair trade voting record: Strongly Opposes topic 13
YES on removing common goods from national security export rules: Favors topic 13
YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam: Favors topic 13
NO on extending free trade to Andean nations: Strongly Opposes topic 13
YES on establishing free trade between US & Singapore: Favors topic 13
YES on establishing free trade between the US and Chile: Favors topic 13
NO on implementing CAFTA for Central America free-trade: Strongly Opposes topic 13
YES on free trade agreement with Oman: Strongly Favors topic 13

Opposes topic 14:
Maintain US sovereignty from UN
(-3 points on Economic scale)

US support & no-fly zone, but UN troops on ground in Darfur: Strongly Opposes topic 14
Support UN reform because US benefits: Opposes topic 14
Engage in world affairs, including human rights: Strongly Opposes topic 14
Keep Cuban embargo; pay UN bills: Opposes topic 14
2002 Iraq speech criticized both Saddam and U.N.: Opposes topic 14
2002: Attacking Iraq "not a good option" but authorized it: Favors topic 14
Urged President to veto UN condemnation of Israel: Favors topic 14
Voted against Levin Amendment: it gave UN veto over US: Favors topic 14
Dems believe in fighting terror with cooperation: Strongly Opposes topic 14
Restore habeas corpus for detainees in the War on Terror: Opposes topic 14
YES on preserving habeas corpus for Guantanamo detainees: Strongly Opposes topic 14
YES on requiring CIA reports on detainees & interrogation methods: Strongly Opposes topic 14
NO on removing need for FISA warrant for wiretapping abroad: Strongly Opposes topic 14

No opinion on topic 15:
Expand the military
(0 points on Social scale)

There is no safe haven for the terrorists: Favors topic 15
Our troops are stretched; so increase size of military: Favors topic 15
Rated 100% by SANE, indicating a pro-peace voting record: Strongly Opposes topic 15
Extend reserve retirement pay parity back to 9/11: Favors topic 15
Improve mental health care benefits for returning veterans: Favors topic 15
YES on requiring on-budget funding for Iraq, not emergency funding: Opposes topic 15
YES on limiting soldiers' deployment to 12 months: Opposes topic 15

Strongly Favors topic 16:
More enforcement of the right to vote
(+5 points on Social scale)

Presidents should reveal donations to their foundations: Strongly Favors topic 16
Voter suppression revives old demons of discrimination: Favors topic 16
Stand for public financing and getting money out of politics: Strongly Favors topic 16
Move to public election financing, not banning lobbyists: Strongly Favors topic 16
Verified paper ballot for every electronic voting machines: Favors topic 16
Called for ban on all soft money in 2000 campaign: Favors topic 16
Prohibit 'voter caging' which intimidates minority voting: Favors topic 16
YES on banning campaign donations from unions & corporations: Favors topic 16
YES on banning "soft money" contributions and restricting issue ads: Favors topic 16
NO on establishing the Senate Office of Public Integrity: Opposes topic 16
NO on allowing some lobbyist gifts to Congress: Strongly Favors topic 16

Favors topic 17:
Stay out of Iran
(+2 points on Social scale)

OpEd: More aggressive than most Dems on foreign policy: Opposes topic 17
Smartest strategic choice is peace: Favors topic 17
Extend peace treaties to Palestinians, Syrians & Lebanese: Favors topic 17
Foreign aid spending is only 1%; lead by remaining engaged: Strongly Favors topic 17
Up to the Iraqis to decide the future they will have: Favors topic 17
Demand Bush to explain to Congress on his plan on Iraq: Favors topic 17
Deauthorize Iraq war, and don’t grant new war authority: Strongly Favors topic 17
Phased redeployment out of Iraq, beginning immediately: Strongly Favors topic 17
Withdraw troops within 60 days after taking office: Strongly Favors topic 17
Voted for Iraq war based on available info; now would not: Favors topic 17
Progressive Internationalism: globalize with US pre-eminence: Favors topic 17
No troop surge: no military escalation in Iraq: Strongly Favors topic 17
Require Congress' approval before military action in Iran: Favors topic 17
YES on authorizing use of military force against Iraq: Strongly Opposes topic 17
NO on redeploying troops out of Iraq by July 2007: Strongly Opposes topic 17
YES on redeploying US troops out of Iraq by March 2008: Strongly Favors topic 17

Strongly Favors topic 18:
Prioritize green energy
(-5 points on Economic scale)

$100B per year by 2020 for climate change mitigation: Strongly Favors topic 18
$100B per year by 2020 for climate change mitigation: Strongly Favors topic 18
Remove energy dependence on countries who would harm us: Strongly Favors topic 18
Stands for clean air and funding the EPA: Favors topic 18
Reduce air pollution to improve children’s health: Favors topic 18
Ratify Kyoto; more mass transit: Strongly Favors topic 18
Supports tradable emissions permits for greenhouse gases: Favors topic 18
Keep efficient air conditioner rule to conserve energy: Strongly Favors topic 18
Establish greenhouse gas tradeable allowances: Strongly Favors topic 18
Rated 100% by the CAF, indicating support for energy independence: Favors topic 18
Designate sensitive ANWR area as protected wilderness: Favors topic 18
Set goal of 25% renewable energy by 2025: Strongly Favors topic 18
Let states define stricter-than-federal emission standards: Strongly Favors topic 18
Gas tax holiday for the summer: Opposes topic 18
NO on terminating CAFE standards within 15 months: Strongly Favors topic 18
YES on targeting 100,000 hydrogen-powered vehicles by 2010: Strongly Favors topic 18
YES on removing consideration of drilling ANWR from budget bill: Favors topic 18
YES on reducing oil usage by 40% by 2025 (instead of 5%): Strongly Favors topic 18
YES on disallowing an oil leasing program in Alaska's ANWR: Strongly Favors topic 18
YES on banning drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Favors topic 18
YES on factoring global warming into federal project planning: Favors topic 18
YES on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies: Strongly Favors topic 18

Opposes topic 19:
Never legalize marijuana
(+2 points on Social scale)

Medical marijuana now; wait-and-see on recreational pot: Opposes topic 19
Medical marijuana maybe ok; states decide recreational use: Opposes topic 19
Divert non-violent drug offenders away from prison: Strongly Opposes topic 19
Address drug problem with treatment and special drug courts: Strongly Opposes topic 19
End harsher sentencing for crack vs. powder cocaine: Opposes topic 19
Require chemical resellers to certify against meth use: Favors topic 19

Strongly Favors topic 20:
Stimulus better than market-led recovery
(-5 points on Economic scale)

Wealthy should go back to paying pre-Bush tax rates: Favors topic 20
Want to restore the tax rates we had in the ‘90s: Favors topic 20
Help people facing foreclosure; don’t just bail-out banks: Strongly Favors topic 20
Minimum wage increases haven’t kept up with Congress’ wages: Strongly Favors topic 20
Co-sponsored bills totaling $502B in spending thru 2005: Strongly Favors topic 20
End Bush tax cuts;take things away from rich for common good: Favors topic 20
Social issues matter; wrong time for tax cuts: Strongly Favors topic 20
Use tax dollars to upgrade infrastructure, not for stadium: Strongly Favors topic 20
America can afford to raise the minimum wage: Strongly Favors topic 20
Just Say No to GOP tax plan: Strongly Favors topic 20
YES on increasing tax rate for people earning over $1 million: Strongly Favors topic 20

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Can you imagine all the lost media ad revenue if The Game is over before half time? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #1
So sad that even on on DU Hillary haters have to resort to FAUX to make their "case." MoonRiver Feb 2015 #2
And some RW media website "pledges" a million dollars....same apoleptic response. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #3
Yeah shenmue Feb 2015 #6
Absolutely! MoonRiver Feb 2015 #7
You mean the same Faux Nooz, whose owner held fundraisers for her in 2008? Fuddnik Feb 2015 #52
Hillary's ties to lobbyists aren't a right-wing creation Enrique Feb 2015 #4
Oh noes! Hillary only gets her money from poor people and, um, angels. djean111 Feb 2015 #10
Criticizing her for big corporate donors is silly treestar Feb 2015 #12
And then, of course, we are admonished that OF COURSE the elected one has to please their big djean111 Feb 2015 #15
How can they "please" them? treestar Feb 2015 #20
I do not buy that lessening regulations on wall Street will avoid a recession. djean111 Feb 2015 #24
who could this be... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #129
You invented all that stuff treestar Feb 2015 #178
How has Hillary claimed she want to regulate them less? treestar Feb 2015 #195
there is a way to fix that.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #28
Oh, I don't think Hillary is going to regulate Wall Street. Which vote are you referring to? djean111 Feb 2015 #32
"you don't think" VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #38
No, not when she gives speeches to banks saying we are just being mean to them. djean111 Feb 2015 #41
She gives lots of speeches....and she raises money for lots of philanthropic causes too... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #43
Oh good grief. This is my last response to you today. "lots of speeches" - which is where you get djean111 Feb 2015 #48
Of course it is....when you have no evidence to support your theory....that is what one does... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #50
... The good old fashioned announced ignore. Agschmid Feb 2015 #90
What speech? treestar Feb 2015 #196
I think "we" is us stupid liberal Lefties. djean111 Feb 2015 #198
sounds like an opinionated summary treestar Feb 2015 #205
Not alone in their opinion. djean111 Feb 2015 #207
Protip MFrohike Feb 2015 #74
No it doesn't ....none of her supporters consider her to be "some kind of Liberal Jesus" VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #93
Well, no MFrohike Feb 2015 #116
My point is...her record shows she IS a Liberal Democrat. VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #121
See, that's your problem MFrohike Feb 2015 #122
You see.....its not a problem... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #123
Not so much, no MFrohike Feb 2015 #124
OHHHH you want evidence.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #125
Heh MFrohike Feb 2015 #131
Oh I've read it...its you that needs to!... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #134
If you say so MFrohike Feb 2015 #137
Yeah I say so....and I have public records to prove it... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #140
Except you don't MFrohike Feb 2015 #144
Except I DO....those are all documented! READING is fundamental VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #146
Cool MFrohike Feb 2015 #148
and that is just ONE of many many many just like it that i have to support my contentions... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #150
In other words.. VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #136
Cool MFrohike Feb 2015 #139
damn skippy.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #141
It could be that MFrohike Feb 2015 #143
Oh thats what you think? Could be that you have a preconceived notion based on VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #145
It could be MFrohike Feb 2015 #147
Or it could be that you wouldn't know what documented public records were...if they jumped up and VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #149
You must be tired MFrohike Feb 2015 #152
actually I am not....I am posting the actual record of this LIBERAL Democrat. VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #157
I finally get it MFrohike Feb 2015 #159
No not "JUST" economic matters....OVERALL the woman is a Liberal Democrat... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #161
Well, make the argument MFrohike Feb 2015 #164
its not "walls of text"....its FACTS in Public Record...Every ONE of them sourced! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #167
Oh man, now you're condescending MFrohike Feb 2015 #172
No indentation and no punctuation.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #175
You're doing it wrong MFrohike Feb 2015 #177
In Summary VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #126
In summary MFrohike Feb 2015 #132
I have read my evidence thank you....it proves exactly what I am saying... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #151
Read the Social Security section MFrohike Feb 2015 #153
I have read it...thanks... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #155
No she does not, or more likely pretends not to /nt Dragonfli Feb 2015 #128
You got evidence of that? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #130
Why yes, you. You are the evidence /nt Dragonfli Feb 2015 #158
no but I DO have the evidence.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #160
Have you ever tried making this claim to a Republican? treestar Feb 2015 #197
Sigh MFrohike Feb 2015 #199
Bravo deutsey Feb 2015 #213
When she pulls that stuff out, it is best to give up discussing the content with her Dragonfli Feb 2015 #100
Except my arguments stem from actual facts..... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #127
This is kind of fun MFrohike Feb 2015 #135
badly reasoned arguments? I just laid out abortion in response to another post...lets move on to VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #138
hahahahahahhahahahahahahaha MFrohike Feb 2015 #142
Oh looks like you need another topic...lets see... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #154
Woo MFrohike Feb 2015 #162
Woo my butt.....the public record is there... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #163
At least I picked MFrohike Feb 2015 #166
I didn't have to "pick" its public record...AND sourced... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #168
Comedy MFrohike Feb 2015 #170
Well there ya go, have fun with that Dragonfli Feb 2015 #156
and you have something that supports this in public record do you? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #165
Why yes, you just posted it, thanks for that by the way. /nt Dragonfli Feb 2015 #169
Item #1 is OpEd: Disagrees with progressives on corporatism & military. (Dec 2014)  TheKentuckian Feb 2015 #180
that is not the full record though is it? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #182
and here you go... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #183
Perhaps you should read further...its about a "total score" what we Democrats like to call a RECORD. VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #184
Well then how about criticizing her for this. A Simple Game Feb 2015 #27
Exactly not even Obama.... Historic NY Feb 2015 #51
Criticizing ONLY her would be silly. Orsino Feb 2015 #57
Just how do you expect someone pure enough to get elected? treestar Feb 2015 #200
I don't buy that framing. Orsino Feb 2015 #212
Downplaying its importance is legitimate argumentation. Calling it "LIES" is, itself, a lie. Jim Lane Feb 2015 #95
Poor people don't donate to candidates. They need to eat. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #14
I do not see Hillary as "relatively progressive". She is not for anything progressive, IMO, before djean111 Feb 2015 #17
Care to answer my question? nt SunSeeker Feb 2015 #18
Your question, with the "besides Hillary" part, is illogical or something. False premise. djean111 Feb 2015 #25
Oh really? Whats so "NOT at all Progressive" about this record? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #133
Not for anything "relatively progressive"? Really now? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #31
"Strongly favors" doesn't mean anything these days, sorry. djean111 Feb 2015 #37
Of course not in YOUR world view it doesn't.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #40
I am starting to believe you honestly feel no one should have a "world view" that you do not djean111 Feb 2015 #44
I am starting to think that you don't believe Hillary Clinton has a public record of what she has VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #47
Of course you're right, VR. Hillary is a progressive by any definition. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #46
EXACTLY.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #49
So why was there a Civil Rights Act, a Social Security Act, etc? treestar Feb 2015 #21
I totally agree with you, treestar. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #61
wow that's inspiring ND-Dem Feb 2015 #23
How is this for inspiring.. VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #33
gee, shouldn't this come with a multitude of blue links? bbgrunt Feb 2015 #58
Your bullying of DUers for posting facts is disgusting. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #65
I was waiting for this one treestar Feb 2015 #201
It isn't an issue specific to Hillary, as the articles make it appear. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #26
People can be easily manipulated and it's all about $$$$$. Fox and the RW are very skilled RKP5637 Feb 2015 #5
Many corps will donate to BOTH parties just to deflect - Can anyone here HONESTLY blm Feb 2015 #8
And remember...M$NBC Just fredamae Feb 2015 #9
Uh they haven't announced that.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #34
Yes, thank you-it is my opinion...n/t fredamae Feb 2015 #42
My problem with this and other smears is making a mountain out of a molehill OKNancy Feb 2015 #11
I agree Andy823 Feb 2015 #13
Couldn't Clinton easily dispel these concerns by echoing Warren and Sanders? fbc Feb 2015 #16
Her advisers will tell her when it is okay to parrot Warren and Sanders, okay? djean111 Feb 2015 #22
Her actions speak louder than her words. Whose lobbying as First Lady was critical pnwmom Feb 2015 #29
she can easily dispel it with her own record... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Feb 2015 #19
+1 marym625 Feb 2015 #68
Why does no one post the headers when they post this table? Agschmid Feb 2015 #91
Because then they wouldn't be able to lie about what the table means. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #114
Indeed, I always notice that there are NO headers ever when that table is posted. Agschmid Feb 2015 #115
Is the header supposed to be reassuring? progressoid Feb 2015 #192
You skipped part... Agschmid Feb 2015 #194
Why? The employees may not be "rich." treestar Feb 2015 #202
Bwahahahahahahaaa. progressoid Feb 2015 #208
Are you claiming everyone who works for Goldman Sachs treestar Feb 2015 #210
Nope. progressoid Feb 2015 #211
How Funny,,,,, Cryptoad Feb 2015 #30
Just so I understand this inanity whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #35
Oh, just for Hillary. You understand correctly. djean111 Feb 2015 #39
It is applicable when convenient like to attack an actual liberal or of course a TeaPubliKlan TheKentuckian Feb 2015 #54
About sums it up whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #56
so true bbgrunt Feb 2015 #60
And if you notice, there's no refutation of the bare facts of who's donated. Lars39 Feb 2015 #82
Of course not, the only response is spin or flat denials of reality. Conservatives excel at both. TheKentuckian Feb 2015 #88
I just hope that no lefties fall for the premise Broward Feb 2015 #45
HDS is alive and well here. riqster Feb 2015 #53
It's not quite "LIES" -- it's disingenuous muckraking. cheapdate Feb 2015 #55
Uh-oh. WSJ just wrote the Earth is round MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #59
I've been a member for 25 years. zappaman Feb 2015 #63
A Reichwinger Tried That On Me Leith Feb 2015 #62
3 things ellennelle Feb 2015 #64
K & R Iliyah Feb 2015 #66
Lots of us recognize them for the right-wing hatchet jobs they are... SidDithers Feb 2015 #67
Yes, Canadians should set DU policy whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #70
As an American (not sure why in the hell that matters, but...) Sid is 100% correct. NYC Liberal Feb 2015 #83
You mean whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #85
DU is not limited to Americans treestar Feb 2015 #203
That goes both ways marym625 Feb 2015 #71
Sometimes the poster is a fraud...nt SidDithers Feb 2015 #76
Really? marym625 Feb 2015 #77
Sure. What would you call someone who's been banned multiple times... SidDithers Feb 2015 #80
exactly what did I say that has anything to do with that? marym625 Feb 2015 #81
Waffles are real, however you cut them. Katashi_itto Feb 2015 #92
A little consistency would be nice, Sid.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #72
plus.1 n/t Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #73
Bashing from the left and bashing from the right have the same result...nt SidDithers Feb 2015 #75
Exactly, neither results in any effect on your life Fumesucker Feb 2015 #84
Please provide the link you reference where Sid says a DUer is "too far to the left." SunSeeker Feb 2015 #78
This is the most recent example.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #86
I remember that marym625 Feb 2015 #96
Oh yeah? Well how about an example where Sid wasn't right about it? MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #97
That doesn't say woo is "too far to the left." SunSeeker Feb 2015 #98
Personally I think Sid rises to the level of performance art and bit past that Fumesucker Feb 2015 #99
No. He's criticizing the destructive use of GOP propaganda to bash a fellow Dem. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #102
What woo says is a long way indeed from GOP talking points.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #103
Bull. There was a post in GD on 2-14-15 pulled straight from a right wing site. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #107
I've seen Skinner post Andrew Sullivan approvingly.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #108
Skinner cited Sullivan when he was actually telling the truth about Obama. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #109
Wait, I thought we were talking about woo? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #110
We're talking about DUers using right wing propaganda against Dems. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #112
You were talking about woo.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #113
I was responding to your assertion about woo, and disputing your characterization of S id's post. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #117
Well according to his response to me marym625 Feb 2015 #79
does HRC favor corporate coups like xl, TPP, aca, and charter schools? Doctor_J Feb 2015 #69
+1 marym625 Feb 2015 #87
The ACA saved my brother's life. It was not a "corporate coup." SunSeeker Feb 2015 #105
healthcare would also have saved your brothers life. we didn't have to sign over Doctor_J Feb 2015 #171
Bullshit. My brother's pre-existing condition made it impossible for him to get coverage. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #173
voters from 2008 stayed home in 2010 because Obama sold them out on every issue Doctor_J Feb 2015 #174
Obama did a lot for us. We didn't have the votes for a public option, let alone Medicare for All. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #185
XL and TPP I understand your confusion....but the ACA and Charter Schools WTF??? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #204
ACA was written by the heritage foundation. Obama's education scheme continues the Doctor_J Feb 2015 #209
Two questions MFrohike Feb 2015 #89
The Media Matters article is specifically about the receipt of donations from foreign sources. Maedhros Feb 2015 #94
I guess you're trying to make the case obxhead Feb 2015 #101
Oh my god this is so lame. JackRiddler Feb 2015 #104
what did hillary say. a VAST rite wing conspiracy. pansypoo53219 Feb 2015 #106
"lefties"? progressoid Feb 2015 #111
Lefties is used by Conservatives as a pejorative. Most "Lefties" wear the label proudly. nm rhett o rick Feb 2015 #188
Yep. progressoid Feb 2015 #191
Especially DINOs, BOGgers, PUMAs, Turd Way, and moles Doctor_J Feb 2015 #193
I'm all for the facts coming out and not distorted by rw hacks or any Hacks for that matter.. Cha Feb 2015 #118
If what they report is false then make that argument. It seems the only argument we see from rhett o rick Feb 2015 #119
+1,000 Scuba Feb 2015 #181
Then you're not paying attention. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #186
Again, I never see anything of substance. Of course Sen Warren is going to be polite rhett o rick Feb 2015 #187
So you're calling Warren a phony liar. Nice. nt SunSeeker Feb 2015 #189
BTW, if you "never see anything of substance," it is because you aren't looking. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #190
Doesn't look like there is a lot of money in the Clinton Foundation. Rex Feb 2015 #120
Hillary haters using WSJ and Fox propaganda now? workinclasszero Feb 2015 #176
On any given day just Google the "issue" and "Fox News." joshcryer Feb 2015 #179
Where is the defense of Nader when similar claims are made? nt Bonobo Feb 2015 #206
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The origin of a RW hack j...»Reply #36